IBM, a major advertiser on X, has pulled its spending from the social media platform, whose employees are grappling with what to tell its other advertisers, according to internal messages.
To be clear: Musk endorsed a tweet which used a false antisemitic conspiracy theory to tell people why “Hitler was right”
What IBM products do you own?
Cognos Analytics at work and like a lot of folks there’s a cheap IBM server card in my media center supporting an array for network storage.
That’s not counting the dozens of IBM products that are at the various levels of all the networks we travel through online.
And that’s what they have adds for on X? Some software and hardware that’s like 1% of their revenue? And they are one of the biggest add buyers? That’s the insane part. It would make more sense for Samsung or apple to buy adds for phones or laptops, you know, things everyone uses. IBM doesn’t have consumer products. Why are they spending so much money on X?
The whole premise of ads on Twitter is that they’re targeted.
IBM don’t sell consumer crap. They sell smoke and mirrors to major governments and industry. They’re chasing jobs worth millions per pop. They want ads to target the people making those decisions.
Actually I saw IBM consultant for a very large corp suggested Dell terminals while IBM end user things existed. For a modern mainframe, a PC is just a terminal emulator, browser (extensively used) and a development machine.
This would only make sense if targeting rich individuals was somehow significantly more expensive. They’re showing ads to very small group of X users. Their ads cost the same as other ads. They should not be spending more than companies selling consumer products.