I love the idea of a privacy-focused fronend for YouTube, but every time I visit a piped link, it just spins forever. Both on my Linux desktop and my Android phone.

Maybe I’m doing something wrong?

Here is the latest one I tried and failed to load.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m afraid if it’s not a) FOSS and b) on F-Droid, I’m not interested. Grayjay appears not to qualify on either front.

      Edit: Oh damn. Louis Rossmann made Grayjay. Now I’m a little disappointed in Louis Rossmann.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Also, check the FUTO About page

        https://futo.org/what-is-futo/

        Check their ‘Our Three Pledges’, particularly the third one regarding open source…

        Quoted from their site, pledge #3

        “We will always be transparently devoted to making delightful software. All FUTO-funded projects are expected to be open-source or develop a plan to eventually become so. No effort will ever be taken to hide from the people what their computers are doing, to limit how they use them, or to modify their behavior through their software.”

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          All FUTO-funded projects are expected to be open-source or develop a plan to eventually become so.

          Huh. Well, if it even lands in F-Droid, maybe I’ll give it a try.

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The app is so relatively new that initially it wasn’t even on any of the app stores, only straight from their site. But now it’s also on Google Play and APKPure, possibly other alternative app stores as well. Give it some time, I’m pretty sure F-Droid is on their radar as well sooner or later.

            The app is still labeled as being Under Construction, but so far I’m rather pleased with it and would recommend giving it a try.

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I saw that. It’s not FOSS, though if that’s what you’re implying.

          Just reading over the license, it allows neither making modifications to the source nor commercial use. Allowing both of those would be necessary for it to qualify as either Free Software or Open Source. (And I’m not sure those are the only things in the license preventing it from qualifying as FOSS.)

          Source available ≠ FOSS. And Grayjay isn’t FOSS even if its source can be perused.

          • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            TBH I don’t really care that much as long as the source is available. Some talented dev can fork it if the project goes sideways. I’d like a webapp/desktop app too

            • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Some talented dev can fork it

              Not without infringing copyright. At least not the way the license is written now.

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            They don’t give a flying crap if you modify the source and compile it privately for yourself, they just don’t want people or companies making profit from their works or distributing said modifications without their approval.

            • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              They don’t give a flying crap if you modify the source and compile it privately for yourself

              Then why do they leave permission to do so out of their license? (So far, at least.)

              they just don’t want people or companies making profit from their works or distributing said modifications without their approval.

              That’s called “proprietary.”