• GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not in my case, I think. Very stereotypical conservative, religious parents. Have rejected many of their bigoted values, kept the work ethic, tried to carry empathy to it’s logical conclusion rather than stopping when they thought it was hard. I’ve changed religions. I think my country’s military policy is abhorrent.

  • ripcord@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is one of the ways that I know none of the religions claiming to be the “truth” are true.

    99.99% of the time, your religion is based on who your parents are and where you were born, not what is actually true.

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve always been stifled by people getting born into one of religions and suddenly thinking it is the true one.

      Like, how likely it is for you to be born straight into the correct religion when the world is full or heresy?

      How do you differ for all those believing, with same dedication, in something else?

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, yea. The whole idea is that you want to survive in whatever environment you were born into, whether that’s North Sentinel Island or the Siberian taiga or downtown Mexico City. So, the homo sapiens operating system is pretty flexible, you can put whatever you want on it. This food, that food, this music, that music, it’s all subjective. You just calibrated to your environment.

    Started in the womb, your moms amniotic fluid can change flavors depending on what mom ate, which has some influence on a baby’s preferences.

    The fact that our environments vary so much, and there’s a lot of rng in general, gives us a lot of the diversity we’re so fond of. None of it stays static either, it’s all flowing and changing over time, so, the flexible operating system really is necessary. No fucking clue what a baby is gonna be asked to do in 30 years, might be anything from a soldier to a doctor. Well, doctor might take a few more years…

    • scarabic@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly. We all adapt to what’s around us. Which, for me, explains how prisoners can eventually come to help their kidnappers. People consider Stockholm Syndrome incredibly strange, unexplainable. But it’s the basic thing we are built to do.

  • BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Pssh, not me. I was born into a homophobic redneck culture and I hated it. I now consider myself an LGBTQ+ ally and computer nerd.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Same. I grew up in rural Ohio (USA) going to churches talking about the “synagogues of satan”, people at school saying “that’s Jewish” for something lame, lots of words I won’t repeat here about a number of ethnic and sexual minorities, etc.

      It all basically never sat well with me. I moved out when my mom remarried which was a bit before my senior year of high school. Bigger city, bigger school, more diversity, etc. quickly proved what I had long felt: humans are humans and neither their religion nor ethnicity nor gender identity changed that. This would have been in the late '90s.

      I now live on the other side of the world from that place (Japan, of course, having its own issues with things like gender and racism, but that’s (a) mostly the older generations and (b) a story for another time). Before I quit facebook years ago, I did catch up with a couple of people. Most of them did not change, but many of the bad ones got worse (this would have been around 2016) and emboldened by far-right groups growing in popularity. Living as a minority in another country also taught me a lot of about privilege and accidental racism.

    • Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So you agree with it but escaped it?

      Then again maybe you are subject to some other form of Stockholm syndrome?

  • Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s even more fucky when you start to consider if the ideals, values, and beliefs you hold are actually ones you yourself have determined, or if you’ve just chosen those because it’s been passed onto you either by culture, society, or your environment.

    Take the old adage “treat others how you would want to be treated” - is that something you believe because you’ve just been told that for so long? Or is that something you intrinsically believe in regardless of what others have said?

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Take the old adage “treat others how you would want to be treated” - is that something you believe because you’ve just been told that for so long? Or is that something you intrinsically believe in regardless of what others have said?

      For what it’s worth, this is essentially the “tit-for-tat” strategy from game theory, and you can rigorously prove it to be a superior cooperative strategy in many situations. Essentially, cooperation with others enables greater community success than everyone going alone, but trusting others always exposes you to selfish people that will take advantage of you. The optimal strategy is to cooperate by default, but if someone reveals themselves to be untrustworthy, stop cooperating and ideally work with others to punish them.

      You actually see this bear out in nature in other animals as well. Vampire bats will share blood with other vampire bats that didn’t successfully feed, but they also keep track of individual contributions, and if they identify that a bat is freeloading, they’ll stop feeding it. By default, they cooperate to help each other, but if a selfish actor is identified, they stop helping it.

      In the abstract, so long as most actors aren’t selfish and the cost of being betrayed isn’t too high, tit-for-tat is the optimal strategy.

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some things just make sense, and some truth can be found with just honest debate.

    • scarabic@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a good sign that it keeps you up. Few people ever think about this stuff.

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Basically what I think about gun support. It’s statistically awful to be around guns or be around those with guns. But we still have them and some of us fight for them because they feel safer when they’re really, really not.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You sound white and privileged; try being a minority in a place where cops are racist/sexist/genderist and crime is high and see how fast you will change your mind.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Do you think pulling a gun against a cop will help you get home safely?

        (I am not argueing against your point that there are bad cops. I just don’t think pulling a gun against a cop will help you stay safe.)

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You know how I know you’re a white privileged kid that never grew up with any adversity? You never considered that cops will delay their response, if respond at all, to help you because of your skin color or income demographic or sexual preferences.

          You went straight to the ignorant thought of a gun owner addressing cops with violence and not a criminal trying to rob you in front of your family or being trans living in a community that wants you not to exist.

      • stevecole90099@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The asshat is clearly privileged, but don’t stoop to racism like them. Be the change you want in the world. The right to bear arms and defend yourself from criminals and tyranny alike is a right that every American should practice and cherish no matter what they look like. One day, we’ll get that dream even if we have to deal with a few nightmares first.

    • stevecole90099@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Guns aren’t safe. They aren’t supposed to be safe, or at least they aren’t supposed to be any safer than any other tool. They are a tool that is very specifically designed to grant their user an increased ability to injure a target with ease from a safe distance. This ability grants the user an increased ability to hunt, to defend themselves, to defend their property and family, and yes to harm or kill other people and predators.

      A hammer, a knife, a blunt object, and a car can all provide these same abilities with differing efficiency, but we still have them, too, even though they aren’t necessary. You don’t need to drive. Walk or take a bus. You don’t need a hammer to drive nails. Use a rock instead. Although there is a famous story about a guy named Cain, that makes a strong argument for getting rid of rocks, too. No one needs a baseball bat. Those are only used for recreation, so it should be easy to get rid of those dangerous weapons, right? I’m sure we can get rid of those dangerous knives, too. Our ancestors didn’t need them to survive, so I’m sure we can do without them to make the world a safer place.

      This is why we have a rule that none of these things can be used for that thing about killing other people under threat of harm or death unless it was done under pretty specific circumstances.

      You are statistically safer around a gun than you are around a ladder, but I’m guessing ladders aren’t on your list of things to rid the world of for some reason.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I like how you ignore the fact you’re statistically less safe if you own a gun.

        No need to change the subject to ladders.

        The point is whatever perceived safety you get from your human killing device is negated by having the device itself.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No. You know your argument is not appropriate. I don’t need to tell you that.

            You argueing that way, because you want your guns and have to find a moral excuse so that it doesn’t look like your only argument is “Boom Boom Manly Man Boom”.

            You are argueing in bad faith, so no need to engage in that argumentation.

            • stevecole90099@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              You’re one to talk. The only excuse you have is that you seem to have something against people who identify as men. Yea, real amazing argument there. Congrats on identifying as a basic leftist bitch with no common sense.

              I don’t appreciate someone trying to steal my right to bear arms away from me, risking my safety and restricting my right to defend myself from criminals simply because they don’t like tools that go Boom Boom Boom.

              Go back to reddit where you belong.

              • Square Singer@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                So, I am a man. I do identify as a man. What does that have to do with anything?

                I hate idiots who need dangerous toys to feel manly, because they have nothing else that would make them a man.

                If a gun is the only thing that makes you a man, then you are no man, but just a little boy who never grew up.

                Tag along, kiddo. Maybe one day you’ll understand what a man is.

                • ace90099@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You seem to be the only one here that thinks gun = man.

                  Have fun defending yourself with your so call manhood when some crack head pulls a gun on you someday.

                  🖕