• FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    There’s a fine line between ‘bug’ and ‘oversight’ and just about every time people are using ‘bug’ to not look incompetent.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    Slur? The article seems to say it’s just the word “fuck”

    Are people still shocked by stupid shit like profanity? I was expecting racial slurs or something actually bad…

  • Slowy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lol I saw that yesterday on a google search and literally thought it must be some kind of custom lemmy instance that mocked the UI and URL, too funny

  • ryan@the.coolest.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not the same thing, but my immediate thought was Something Awful’s load bearing slur which broke logins when removed.

      • ryan@the.coolest.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Details:

        On January 1, 2020, Lowtax changed a setting so that unregistered users could not see the forum index. Anyone not logged in would be given the banpage because of ‘=’ in place of ‘==’ in a section of the code. This led to discovery of an ancient bit of radium code that changed ‘unregistered user’ to a homophobic slur. Jeffrey fixed the bug, but this load bearing slur will live on forever.

        While details are scarce at this point, my best assumption as to what happened hinges on the idea that non-logged-in users with a presumed username string value of unregistered user were meant to be forwarded to the login page, but because a separate section of the code changed the string value of unregistered user to [homophobic slur here], hence nobody actually got the correct forwarding and they were all sent by default to the ban page. If I recall, this led to the unintended side effect of non-logged-in users being unable to log in.

        @favrion@lemmy.world @KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz @Klear@lemmy.world

    • WhoresonWells@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Verge’s editorial standards may discourage printing out the f-word in question, but following the links shows it to be the f-word for homosexual, not the f-word for copulation.