• CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Damn I didn’t know it was 10x the cost. Crazy how a company that size still can’t handle the fees.

      • CluckN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        I also didn’t know that South Korea charges extra for foreign content providers which is also pretty aggressive.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, and it all started from a lawsuit between SK Telecom and Netflix because in 2020 people watching Squid Games in Korea used an unprecedented amount of bandwidth. Reuters article

          Most telecom providers make deals with the big platforms regarding payment, but I guess S. Korea really wants Afreeca to be the only player in the streaming space. It could also be chaebol shenanigans.

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s no “don’t wanna” unless there’s a “can’t” due to not being able to make a profit. If they could they would. It’s simple as that.

        • PrettyLights@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Companies don’t just want to make a profit, they want to make the largest profit. Plenty of businesses turn down profitable ventures in pursuit of more lucrative returns.

          • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why would they do that if they aren’t mutually exclusive to one another? I’d get this notion if they’d started to do some sort of alternate way of providing for the SK market where their original platform would have been in the way but why close off profitable branches for no reason at all?

            • PrettyLights@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Because an organization or person only has so much bandwidth and attention. You can’t infinitely scale to grab every bit of profit.

              “Tripping over dollars to pick up pennies.”

          • Chailles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            While true, that’s not exactly relevant when it’s a choice between losing a lot of money and not losing a lot of money.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      10x the cost of what tho? They just say “most other countries”, but tahts just spin and essentially meaningless without more data