Hannah Payne has been convicted on all charges in the death of 62-year-old Kenneth Herring.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    Moral of this story: don’t try to be a vigilante law enforcer. Let the police shoot the Black man; they’re professionals.

  • bouldering_barista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow, just from reading this article this sounds like a victory. She had no right to try to take the law into her own hands and now this man paid with his life.

    Our founding fathers did not want random people walking around with guns ready to shoot each other for traffic accidents! Meanwhile, in Ohio last year this happened: “Gov. Mike DeWine signed a bill into law Monday removing training, background check and permitting requirements to carry a concealed weapon in Ohio”. What a fuckwad Dewine is and now more guns are on the streets than before. More people like this woman will end up becoming murderers over stupid situations like this.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I almost had a glint of respect for the man back in 2020 when he stood up to Trump on the whole lockdown/mask thing, but he has lost any points he won with me in the intervening years.

  • lledrtx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    “When I heard the first verdict, I knew we weren’t supposed to show signs, but tears just started rolling down my face because at that moment I felt a relief that came over,” said Jacqueline Herring, one of his sisters.

    Anyone know they shouldn’t show signs?

    • Tenbot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Damn. That Fox news article was absolute trash. 🤔Thanks for providing a more reputable news link!

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, I guess. I can just see him telling his client they have it in the bag and then he says things like…

        “They didn’t show beyond a reasonable doubt that certain things happened”

        “In her mind, she was a young individual trying to help out”

        “No good deed goes unpunished.”

        The fuck kind of defense is that?

        • ZeroTHM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think I misinterpreted your post, I thought you were implying the lawyer was an awful person. I wholeheartedly agree that he did a bad job.

  • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    drunk driver dies

    A gun toting redneck goes to jail for life.

    As a relatively upstanding citizen of society i see this as a complete win.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The penalty for drunk driving is death.

      The penalty for murder is prison.

      You seem ok with this setup.

      • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        10 months ago

        what do you have issues with? i presume this from your final statement.

        please elaborate?

        Are you saying Drunk Driving is okay in any way shape, form or fashion?

        Murder shouldn’t be punished with Prison time?

        I’m not sure where our disconnect is.

        • Taco@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I believe it has to do with the weights of the punishments.

          Although, I will remain neutral in the argument. Drunk driving has the high chance for manslaughter, so could be considered equivalent to attempting murder. However, murder is murder, and should have a larger punishment than chance of murder.

          Of course, in the grand scheme of things, we have no way of preventing the drunk driver’s death because it was “more of a punishment”, for the obvious reason that it already happened.

          In other words, a dickhead is dead and there’s no changing it, so no need to argue about “it not being equal”

            • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m sorry that you find the internet a terrible place where you have no control. it must be alienating. did you want to discuss it?

                • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  married, 10 years as of this year. Just like hitting the internet beez nest, watch the likes of you and your ilk squirm. you replied, so. musta felt some motivation to try and cut me down. must be lonely for you. im sorry.

            • Fades@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Even if the punishment were death, the average fucking citizen is not goddamn judge jury and executioner.

              The toxicology PROVED he was NOT under the influence, which is a perfect example of WHY vigilante murder is unacceptable. Innocent until proven guilty, you piece of shit.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Less than the penalty for murder. More than the penalty for shop lifting. Maybe exactly the same as the penalty for reckless endangerment.

              But I can say with certainty that being shot without a trial is not an acceptable penalty.

      • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        that’s subjective. Human nature be like Human Nature do. if you don’t think so. check out what the Chinese are doing to the Uyghurs. What israel is doing to the palestinian people.

        Loss of life should never be a victory, should. but alas for the cruelty of humans