• grayman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    I find it quite interesting that we can provide someone with a calm and peaceful death, but prisons in many countries can’t do any better than “ouch that looks pretty terrible” to “oh my god that’s torturous!”… Nevermind the morals around whether the state should kill someone.

  • DrQuint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d rather people kill themselves cleanly, painlessly and successfully, that fail to do it, suffer and be made prisoners of others more than they were already of themselves.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The article is weird - the title is what it is, but there’s barely anything inside of it that mentions anything about it being legal, except for a single sentence, with the rest of the article just saying how it works. Digging a bit deeper (by looking up the pod on a search engine lol), it doesn’t seem that the pod is actually approved or made legal or anything, but it was apparently supposed to be made open-source in 2019, in 2021 the creator only sought legal advice about the pod and after that - no more news. Maybe I missed something though.

    tl;dr the article’s title might be misleading

  • peanuts4life@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I had a friend who’s niece, an American, was able to travel to use these. It was a difficult path to research and get these services, as well as expensive, but it definitely helped them a lot.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      When universal healthcare takes care of assisted suicide you don’t need pods. In Spain either the doctor will administer the drugs in hospital or you can take them home and do it yourself. At home method consists of drinking pentobarbital solution.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    what was wrong with the iv with a self-administerable dose via death button approach? not expensive enough for dead people or what

    would the current methods for administering nitrogen not work?

    • Knuk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I’d rather have my last moments being held by my loved ones as it’s currently done than alone in a pod.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “I’ve always wanted to remove the role [and the] need for professional people to prescribe difficult drugs to use.”

    You probably will still need a doctor to declare death and in case anything fails. The drugs are not difficult to use. You just take a pill to suppress vomiting and after an hour drink 100ml of liquid. If anything goes wrong the doctor will inject drugs while your still unconscious. Maybe some people would prefer the pod but for me it looks like a gimmick.

  • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    On the one hand I think this is a humane option that people should have during palliative care.

    However, I am also reasonably confident this will be used to facilitate capital punishment as well. I have mixed feelings about the use of the death penalty, but generally this does seem like a preferable solution to the other available methods so maybe that too is a small mercy in of itself.

    • Vash63@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would you tie this to capital punishment? That isn’t even legal in any of western Europe.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Well for one thing because this (see link) was already a national news story earlier this month. So, it isn’t exactly that far of a leap in logic for these suicide booths to be replicated for use in capital punishment in places where it is still utilized, like the United States.

        One could even argue that it makes the process less morally objectionable, and therefore might make it harder to justify banning the practice. I am simply playing devil’s advocate here because this is precisely the kind of logic that is already pervasive in US politics when justifying otherwise morally objectionable decisions.

        • Skates@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          After looking over the article you linked, it seems like inhaling nitrogen could be dangerous because:

          • a doctor said it could induce nausea and choking on your own vomit. When asked for sources, he countered that there was not enough research on the topic.
          • a priest said so
          • the gas might escape the tubes, therefore those around the gas might be at risk - valid point, to which I would suggest everyone leaving the room and/or wearing oxygen masks

          ??

          The process of capital punishment is already morally objectionable enough. The original article isn’t about that, it’s about assisted suicide. And tbh, I think the US needs to figure out first how to not kill people who don’t wanna die, and only then tackle assisted suicide. Let your politicians prove they care about rehabilitation and preserving life. Until then, you’re asking the wolves to make laws (and choices) for the sheep.