• Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Climate scientists: “The climate is fucked now! We needed to intervene 20 years ago. We must take emergency intervention!”

      Government/industry: “We’ll get right on that in 10-15 years.”

    • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thanks for the info. I guess by now we should just expect them to continually push it further.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      2030 would be an election year as were 2035 I don’t think they’d want to push it back on an election year.

      Anyway by the time 2035 rolls around a lot of cars will probably be electric already and it’ll be less of an issue.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I’m fairly sure that even if there’s a snap election this year the election after that will be in 2030. Doing it early will just hand the new government a few extra months of power, it doesn’t calculate forward from the last election it’s just every 5 years regardless of what else is going on.

      • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not sure I agree. Drivers are a significant voting bloc in any election. It’ll always pay off to placate them.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          But this is a future election that won’t occur for over a decade, and remember this will potentially have occurred after 10 years of left wing politics. Combine that with the fact that people are quite sensitive about environmental issues already, and that’s going to only increase over the next 11 years.

          • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            2030 is only six years away. Watch drivers lose all sensitivity about the environment when they are required to buy a more expensive car that doesn’t go as far as their old one and is way less convenient on long distances. I believe you’re a bit optimistic about people’s willingness to change. Everyone is all for saving the environment until they have to personally chip in.

            Plus, you know, lobbies. Executives might lose money. Money!! Absolutely can’t have that.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Eighty percent of new cars and 70 percent of new vans sold in Great Britain must be zero emission by 2030, increasing to 100 percent by 2035

    As usual the headline doesn’t give the full story.

  • nexusband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Whoever thinks EVs are zero emission should be slapped with tires and brake dust.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nope, same goes with public transport. Trams are actually pretty bad in terms of particular matter

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Brits have a niche position on sports car manufacturing. It will be fun to see new models of Morgan’s and TVRs.

  • Sirico@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Whoops someone realised they’d likely still be in their position when 2030 comes rolling by and would have to make an effort

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Most people can’t afford to buy electric cars, so… Either they become cheaper with time (they should) or less people will be able to drive a car…

    I’m in the market now looking for cars and I was shocked by how expensive the electric ones are in comparison to hybrids or fuel driven ones.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      11 months ago

      Most people can’t afford to buy new cars period.

      This doesn’t stop people buying 10 year old ICEs. You can still buy a 10 year old one in 2045.

      I’m pretty sure EV tech has improved enough by then to make cheap cars possible.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    All new cars and vans bought in the UK must be zero emission by 2035, according to the latest legal mandate updated this week.

    The government says this is giving consumers more time to make the switch and deal with the UK’s charging infrastructure.

    While the government points to statistics indicating a 41 percent increase in zero-emission vehicles registered for the first time – note, the vast majority of newly registered vehicles still remain conventionally powered – charging infrastructure is an altogether different story.

    According to research from RAC, a local roadside assistance business, the government has failed to meet its target of having six or more rapid or ultra-rapid electric vehicle chargers at every motorway service area in England.

    EV owners are faced with a bewildering array of charging options, from using a UK three-pin plug through various types and speeds up to the latest and greatest from Tesla.

    Finally, the government’s plans also fail to tackle that other challenge faced by EV drivers: finding a public charge point that actually works.


    The original article contains 394 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!