Women inflict violence by proxy. So she just threatens to get one of her male acquaintances to harm you. This is also why women on male violence appears so much lower then male on woman violence. That and the fact that society is very incredulous and dismissive of male victims of female violence.
Don’t they know if he gives them a handout it will create a dependency /s.
I think a big stumbling block is authentication. I think Web 3 could really revive indie forums if the was integrated properly.
It was give people a single sign on for thousands of forums.
Qubes OS.
I’ve created a new community /c/housing_bubble_2. How do I get it featured on newcommunities?
I really don’t see how this doesn’t conflict with GDPR.
Oh is she from Eastern Europe?
This, they aren’t protecting anyone’s right, just picking a better case.
Maybe this rising fascism problem will solve itself.
It doesn’t consist of all extreme views but many mainstream feminist ideology had extremists views.
Direct quotes are “insane incel bull****”? She really said that and the theme appears in all her writings.
Her and Solanas both argued men have to be castrated before a feminsit transformation of sexuality can begin.
She was and she says it in both that and other wrirings and publically.
“Male sexuality, drunk on its intrinsic contempt for all life, but especially for women’s lives, can run wild.”
“Hatred of women is a source of sexual pleasure for men in its own right.”
She argued that penetration was a form of “occupation”.
“intercourse remains a means or the means of physiologically making a woman inferior”
She labeled women that had sexual with men “collaborators”.
But defenders like you will split hairs to make it seem like her demonization of male sexuality is just made up by her critics.
One major reason is that feminism, which deeply influences culture, posits that all men are rapists in the waiting. For an example here a quote from a prominent and influential feminist.
“Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.”
This chills any frank discussion of male sexuality because that would be implicit endorsement of sexual assault.
Here’s an example of a prominant influential feminist calling all men rapists.
“Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.”
All she’s saying is that she meant maritial sex is a form of violence because maritial rape was legal, which wasn’t even true.
It’s a distinction without a difference.
She did say it’s degrading and a form of contempt inflicted by men on women. In the context of the books it’s not at all unreasonable to interpret it as rape.
Regardless it DOES posit male sexuality and violence and degragation of women when it is expressesed.
Regardless that’s her influence even if unintentional and it’s all over media and culture.
Can you elaborate?