![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
That other than a niche we specialize in, we’re pretty fucking dumb at everything else.
That other than a niche we specialize in, we’re pretty fucking dumb at everything else.
Ck3 with the plague mechanics does this. The base game has some default settings that absolutely wrecks everything once plagues get going and only having the DLC can change those settings.
No day like today to remember you’re old now.
This can get complicated when you know that the “No” can actually mean “Yes, but I don’t want to get annoyed any further”.
Uh no. The conflict would have been between old conservatism (pure blood rule) and new conservatism (include muggle born). It’s like one of the main topics of the story. The main baddies are declining aristocrats afraid of losing their position and power.
Bah, just need to oil them up with vaseline.
This how you realize that there are people around that just want to blow shit up.
Reactionary by nature, an inherent biological trait.
Well, if you think about it, they might want to do a Daggerfall with thousands of nondescript villages and dungeons, powered by AI.
Use it as a cassus belli and invade Germany.
Well, I’d say knowing this can add some stress to it, so it does have some significance in a tiny amount.
Only if you’re drinking too much.
Try them at the same time for a combo kill!
You can die of a heart attack if you overdo it.
If the words on the internet are to be believed, GOG’s been running at a loss all this while, with papa Witcher covering the costs. Maintaining a large library of games is expensive.
A thread of the problem is likely the publisher/developer conflict of interest. When the two can’t come to an agreement, the end result usually fails horribly in both aspects.
Neat stuff.
That part’s wild to me, when people are like “This villain in your story seems to have said and done bad things? So that means you agree with them, yes?” No! Of course not! It’s the literal villain in the story, man!
But there is no utilitarian point of art. It exists to express ideas and to tell truth. I think maybe a lot of people get upset because from their point of view, they are paying money, and they have this relationship where it’s like “If it’s not giving me what I wanted out of this transaction, then it’s bad.”
As admitted by some, Lemmy is a haven for outcasts who are insecure and in need of some sort of validation. They’re clingy about the things that provide it and touchy about things that threatens it, thus projecting an intensity in their interactions.
I see it as coping with helplessly living within an unfair reality. We need more zen in our lives.
https://imgur.com/well-bang-okay-FTHf3AP