• Arch
• Arch
• Ubuntu Pro

If you’re not using a standard DE (Gnome, KDE,…) but rather something like i3, Hyprland,… then I highly recommend starting with home-manager on whatever distro you’re currently on. Once you’re happy with that setup, it’s really easy to add the “rest of the system” without risking a giant headache because your desktop still needs to be configured

Isn’t the --remote-host missing here? (Since you’re using --remote-sudo?)

Sure, but if everyone said it differently, than that would also be part of the language. I don’t disagree with you, I just think you’ve described language (in this context) 😄

…no?

I think what plays into this is also language. In English / to you, I presume it makes perfect sense to say “Pi is approximately three point one four”. In other languages (for me, German) the literal translation “Pi ist ungefähr drei Punkt eins vier” sounds awful and wrong. We say “Pi ist ungefähr drei Komma eins vier” (“Pi is approximately three comma one four”) so we also write it like this 🤷🏼‍♀️

Wait HTC is making phones again??

sent from my HTC Desire HD

(ok not really but I WISH)

Same. Also German btw 😄

tar -xzf

(read with German accent:) extract the files

I FOUND A STACK OVERFLOW QUESTIONS RECENTLY THAT WAS LITERALLY THIS!

Nr. 1 accepted answer (lots of years ago): something something plenty of information available on Google, no need for this thread

Nr. 2 answer (way fewer years ago): seeing as this is now the first Google result for anything relating to this, here’s how you do it.

(shame I can’t remember what exactly the question was. Please still believe me? 🥺)

Hmmm nooo, I have no problem with you speaking, I’m just pointing out that what you speak makes no sense. That’s just free speech :)

I… What?

If I were to plot all of your positions on the political compass, would that draw Rick Astley…?

Additionally: word of mouth can turn into sales down the line, too, if the pirate liked the game and talks about it.

At worst, the developer isn’t negatively impacted (by people pirating a game they couldn’t afford / had no intention of buying), at best it leads to more sales.

I don’t see the problem.

And I know that someone reading this will be foaming at their mouth, excited to say “But what if everyone did this? Then developers/studios/… wouldn’t make any money and stop producing games/movies/…!”, so I have to preemptively add the following:

• obviously this is not the case. Pirates have existed for decades.
• pirates pirate because the cost is either too high for them to afford, or higher than what they value the game/… at. If you consider yourself a “rational capitalist” (which, let’s be real, is what most of the anti-piracy-crowd sees themselves at) then consider this as the market working as intended: demand simply isn’t high enough at the price they’re selling at
• and once more, just to make sure this comes across, pirating a digital product incurrs zero (0) loss on the side of the developer/studio. No, you can not count “virtual” losses from what they could have sold if the pirates ever had the intention of buying, or pirating didn’t exist (because, y’know, it does).

Edit: btw I say this as someone who has never pirated a game except for Minecraft when I was, like, 10. I love playing (esp. Indie) games and am happy to pay for them. I just want people to leave folks alone who can’t.

Racist. That’s the adjective describing the father that’s - somehow, miraculously - missing from the quoted excerpt.

Why?

Just checking in to say: Cute dress!

The only flagship phone I know that has all the features (3.5mm, SD card,…) is the Xperia 1 series, and those are kinda expensive, sadly.

And usually Usenet does lend quite a bit of releases you usually see on private indexers or some publics.

Right, that’s also true.

Yes, they do!! With torrents, it just takes a single seeder to keep the torrent alive, but Usenet isn’t peer to peer - you’re downloading stuff from a centralized server(s), and they simply cannot keep everything alive forever.

IMO it’s fine though. Usenet provides you with very timely access to all the “newest” stuff, in excellent, very consistent quality.

And for older stuff, there’s torrents.

I pay for one Usenet provider/indexer. I also still use tons of torrent sources.

90% of the time, stuff that I’m monitoring gets downloaded via Usenet for currently airing or rather new shows.

50% of the time when actively looking for stuff from the past 5-10 years I use Usenet, the other half is torrents

90% of stuff older than that, I only find torrents

100% of non-English stiff I get from torrents (I’m subscribed to an English Usenet indexer though, so that tracks).

In short: Why not use both?