Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agodeath of the ruleternetpawb.socialexternal-linkmessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1external-linkdeath of the ruleternetpawb.socialCount Regal Inkwell@pawb.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-squaresmiletolerantly@awful.systemslinkfedilinkarrow-up30·edit-25 months agoI FOUND A STACK OVERFLOW QUESTIONS RECENTLY THAT WAS LITERALLY THIS! Nr. 1 accepted answer (lots of years ago): something something plenty of information available on Google, no need for this thread Nr. 2 answer (way fewer years ago): seeing as this is now the first Google result for anything relating to this, here’s how you do it. (shame I can’t remember what exactly the question was. Please still believe me? 🥺)
minus-squaresparkle@lemm.eelinkfedilinkCymraegarrow-up5·5 months ago (shame I can’t remember what exactly the question was. Please still me? 🥺) I think about half the threads on stackoverflow fit this criteria
I FOUND A STACK OVERFLOW QUESTIONS RECENTLY THAT WAS LITERALLY THIS!
Nr. 1 accepted answer (lots of years ago): something something plenty of information available on Google, no need for this thread
Nr. 2 answer (way fewer years ago): seeing as this is now the first Google result for anything relating to this, here’s how you do it.
(shame I can’t remember what exactly the question was. Please still believe me? 🥺)
I think about half the threads on stackoverflow fit this criteria