Across America, clean energy plants are being banned faster than they’re being built::The clock is ticking toward a deadline to meet renewable-energy standards. But USA TODAY’s analysis finds local governments banning wind turbines, solar plants.

  • PuddingFeeling [she/her]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    8 months ago

    “But a wave of disinformation in 2023, falsely claiming offshore wind projects killed whales, resulted in a sharp decline in public support for offshore wind.”

    I can’t believe people fell for that.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 months ago

      My dad was absolutely one of them… He mentioned it out of nowhere and I couldn’t refute it because I had never encountered that lunacy before then…

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        He already wanted to hate wind then and this is just his justification. I once encountered someone telling me that wind turbines cause global warming. I told them the only part generating heat was the copper in the motor and that’s the same in every power generation. Turn out Faux News misrepresented a study that showed the turbulence caused by wind turbines brought warm air to the ground level.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Except physically speaking, that warmth from the motor is still just from the energy the wind has… energy that would get transformed to heat from friction eventually anyway. It’s just that this way we get useful work for our own purposes in the form of electricity.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Regardless of the source of rotation, all other aspects are the same as far as heat generation goes. That was the point I tried getting across to the people who were insisting to me that wind turbines cause climate change. Hydro, diesel engine, NG fire or nuclear driven steam turbines, wind turbine. They’re all just spinning copper coils. Any heat from those would be the same.

            The copper coils also had nothing to do with the heat in question anyway. The study was just showing turbulence could bring warm air to ground level. Honestly, sounds like wind turbines should be setup above frost sensitive crops like fruit trees. One bad frost during the tree’s bloom could ruin a whole year’s harvest.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’ll point to articles on Breitbart and other sites that are even less trustworthy.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I hate that. They’ll just say something like “well how can you support solar panels when it kills the rare ballet fork bird?! Or when the solar panels kill the nearby trees!? Or when the toxic chemicals leak into the streams and the kill the river!?”

        It’s just like this slew of crap and you can’t possibly know it’s totally crap when you start talking to them. Then you go back research it and it turns out it’s from some (typically CCP or Russian financially backed) fake news website “pRoMOTinG fReeDoM aNd tHe AMeRicAn wAY.”

        Then they just don’t want to hear about how freedom4everything.scam is a scam and think you’re being political and close minded for insisting they check these things out and look for collaborating sources with more credibility, NYTimes, Washington Post, WSJ, etc.

        Then that turns into a whole “but the NYTimes is too liberal to ever mention mutant fish caused by renewable energy” … and it just goes on and on…

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know how well it works in the end, but when I see that kind of stuff from people I usually say “I’m not going to tell you who to listen to, but try not to use sources that are named anything politically charged. No “patriot.grift” site no “RealMuricanDaily.bs” no “StarSpangledReport.asshat” anyone who chooses a name like that is broadcasting a political bias.”

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can. There is a reason why only two new nuclear reactors have been built since 1972 in the nation that figured the technology out first. It takes almost nothing to scare people out of being smart

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wanna make energy without fucking anything up.

    “Yeah no, stop that right now. It’s illegal.”

    Who the fuck does this? What’s going through their head to make them think there’s any justification? How is there multiple idiots collaborating well enough to get in the way!?

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Some are NIMBYs. Most, however, are alt-right reality-hostile whackadoodles who see any “renewable” energy generation as a liberal plot to destroy America.

      These people actively think that renewables will harm America.

      How do I know this? We have the same crazies up here in Canada. Some of them, despite having been born here, routinely confuse the two countries, spouting US legislation - like the constitutions and amendments - in “defense” of their “freedoms” being “infringed upon” by things like wind turbines.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nah man, it’s some, not most, which makes it all the more depressing. My hometown is a farm town, and some are crying and moaning about turbines, some aren’t.

        The Business-minded Farmers see the green, the local Liberals see the other green, the Hicks see an eyesore, and the Yokels see da librul nrg and shit themselves because “it’s happening in their town”.

        Yokels panic and lie to the hicks, hicks then get scared and hateful towards the one thing that’s not a Dollar General promising new jobs for the town in the last several decades.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not just NIMBY or alt-right trolls that are against windmills. There are legitimate issues with living next to one that get discounted by people that aren’t exposed to it.

        Having noise regulation on the windmills that prevents people living near from hearing them would prevent that from being an issue, but ridicule is the chosen response.

        The blade causing a repetitive shadow is annoying for people and there isn’t a good solution.

        Giving residents within .5-1 miles of a windmill free or reduced electricity would also probably solve 90% of the backlash. It would reduce profits though so it won’t happen.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      To explain the farmer view on wind: I don’t want Industry/ugly ass turbines right next to me.

      But banning solar is the dumbing fucking shit I’ve ever heard of. Bumfuckistan, Buckfuck Nowhere, my hometown at least has solar without a complaint.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Zero farmers want to ban wind. They want to lease their land to power generation companies. They do it all the time, especially where they just graze cattle or sheep. They can do both at the same time.

        Farmers own land to make money, not look at it.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 months ago

          I used to think this, then my sister moved out to the country. The farmers and others who live out there bitch and bitch and bitch about the windmills because they look ugly, and all blink red lights synchronously at night and it’s creepy.

          I think they just don’t like change, which is why they live in the middle of nowhere. I’m also fully in favor of windmills despite hearing their frustrations, I don’t have to live out there. They’ve never bothered me when I visit though.

          But for farmers who don’t graze their animals near the windmills but instead plant crops, the lease doesn’t always cover the loss of cropland apparently. Because they can’t plant within a radius of the thing.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Cry more. I don’t want the climate change to kill everyone.

        Edit: also if we’re complaining about ugly, let me make a list. I’ll start at people rolling coal and end at the fat acceptance people in my fit girls porn.

        • VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The sun is gonna torch the power-grid soon, also some mother fucker is dumping CFC in to atmosphere again.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I had my conservative professor uncle tell me we can’t use windmills because “they use up all the wind.”

        imagine having to explain to your elders that wind isn’t some finite resource.

        • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Wind is finite, and there has actually been research done to estimate the impact slower winds would have (a few degrees iirc), it’s just that this is massively offset by the pros of using wind.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hate to break it to you but wind is a finite resource, it’s unlikely that earths inhabitants would ever saturate it -it is still quite possible just excessively unlikely.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 months ago

    OMG this is the dumbest thing… In NY the town of Florida banned a windmill on waste property, then in racquet lake where they get all sorts of outages they stopped a battery from being installed because they might catch fire. These were BYD LFP batteries, and they were referencing LG chem batteries catching fire in Arizona as the reason.

    • gobills@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      I live in wny the windmills fucking suck. You spend your life savings buying property in the country with gorgeous scenery and views and bam farmer under the thumb of the state gets conned into putting windmills up and your peaceful piece of property is now staring at some dystopian looking shithole landacape. I dont do the conspiracy theories but i totally get voting to not allow windmills in an area you own property in.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Right? I can get “it’s not the view I signed up for” or something, but my dude you do not own the view. You want to own the view it costs a hell of a lot more

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I saw them in the little falls area they look fine to me. I’m sure they are noticed when people have lower energy bills.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        All you have to do is sell power cheaper then them from a source that is also clean or decrease the usage and bam less demand for windmills

  • psychothumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 months ago

    Awful, we really need some kind of federal fast track for these sorts of badly needed projects that cuts through the NIMBY bullshit.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are you kidding me? I opened the article in order to find reasons for banning but after like reading 10min, I gave up, it is such a repetitive article with so many useless words… Has someone a TLDR?

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      8 months ago

      Former President Donald Trump often denigrates wind and solar power in his speeches. In December in New Hampshire, he said, falsely, that wind farms only last 10 years, that they kill “all the birds,” that solar energy isn’t powerful enough to run factories and that wind is 42 times more expensive than natural gas.

      (…)

      “It’s going to change our lifestyle and the landscape and everything around here,” he said.

      (…)

      The opposition sometimes leads to surprising arguments about property rights, in which some landowners invoke concepts like a claim to a “viewshed” – views they want free of wind turbines or solar panels. These opponents clash with others who champion a different view of private property rights, saying landowners should be free to build what they want.

  • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, this isn’t so bad. While the rest of the world lives in a solar punk future, the US could be like some secluded cyberpunk bubble that would give many scholars in the future stuff to write their thesis about, while also providing a good source of memes for the rest of enlightened humanity.

  • catch22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I live in one of the most progressive cities in the US and have had the same issue here. We have no driveway and park on the street but regulations say we cant use the grass strip (the area between the srreet and the curb) to install a charging station for an ev in front of our house. For 5 years we tried to get permission to do this without luck and have given up on ever getting an EV. I dont get how there is any hope for electric vehicles if there arent any working solutions for the millions of people in the United States who dont have a driveway or garage.

    Its time to grab a beer kick back and watch as the planet is destroyed by slow moving bearacratic regulation.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I gave up on humanity decades ago. I’ve got a bottle of SoCo set aside for the end of the world.

  • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    We have windmills all over western Norway, and seriously, fuck that shit. It completely destroys the best part of our nature. Cannot advice against it enough

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      …but like, so do fossil fuels, you just don’t immediately see it. It’s lead to so much contamination and death you’ll never directly witness and is actively destroying everything vs “oh no, that pretty hill!”.

      • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        everything vs “oh no, that pretty hill!”.

        Well it does kill birds. There are other renewable energy sources far preferable over wind energy, considering wind energy is very unreliable, only working when it’s windy. And make that pretty hill into basically every hill. And “oh no that pretty hill” will be ruined for all eternity, including future generations. And while we’re talking about it, how about the special roads that needs to be made to move the windmill blades up in the first place. And the windmill blades will have to be made somehow. Guess what, a lot of tech that goes into windmills are not renewable. People resist wind energy for a reason. Maybe you could just use less electricity instead of destroying every bit of nature left on the earth? Personally I’m in favour of atomic energy

        I can add that night time windmill blinking (so planes and birds don’t crash into them) is really obnoxious and annoying. Even worse than seeing then in day time.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well it does kill birds.

          No they don’t, birds neither like the noise or turbulence so they avoid them. Skyscrapers kill birds. This is decades-old and disproven FUD I hope you at least get money for peddling fossil fuel lobby talking points.

          And “oh no that pretty hill” will be ruined for all eternity, including future generations.

          Oh no! The Hill!

          What about the fucking rest of nature and the planet. Is that hill even high enough to still be above water in 100 years. Is it going to get eroded away by massive rainfall.

          • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Oh no! The Hill! What about the fucking rest of nature and the planet. Is that hill even high enough to still be above water in 100 years. Is it going to get eroded away by massive rainfall.

            Of course a German, from the energy stealing country Germany want Norway to produce even more energy, destroying our nature in the process. Try having every single mountain top, either having windmills, or windmills in the view. We already produce more than enough energy for ourselves. Even more energy can be produced by improving our hydro power stations. But somehow polticians insist on building windmills everywhere, and exporting it all to Germany. I suggest not being overly dependent on energy imports, and actually produce energy yourselves instead of decomissioning all of your nuclear energy plants. Be my guest, destroy all of your nature in the process, if that’s how you want to do it.

            As per dead birds: 0-60 dead birds per windmill per year (Norwegian source : https://www.nve.no/energi/energisystem/vindkraft/kunnskapsgrunnlag-om-virkninger-av-vindkraft-paa-land/fugl/)

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              We already produce more than enough energy for ourselves.

              My state is also producing more than enough for ourselves. Being just as flat as Denmark (and bordering it) we send you tons of that energy to pump into hydrostorage to then export again. It’s practially all windpower.

              As to imports: if you don’t want to send us energy we’ll have to stop sending you steel and chemical products. Also Germany is a net exporter of electricity, I don’t like it either much of it is coal. Notable importer: France, with all their nuclear plants they have to shut down in the summer to not turn their rivers into bouillabaisse.

              dead birds

              Cats and buildings kill many orders of magnitude more birds than wind turbines

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          considering wind energy is very unreliable, only working when it’s windy.

          Saying “no” isn’t the solution to this. Solar and wind work together to cover each other’s flaws. The wind is often blowing when the sun isn’t shining, and vis-à-vis.

          At the next level, you can use historical weather data to calculate how much things will be in a lull where neither are producing. That gives you an idea of how much storage you need to cover it. The details depend on the region, but this is often much, much less than detractors are letting on.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Coal and nat gas also kill birds. Well basically any system that exhausts huge steam vats into the air just absolutely blast some birds.

          • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Good thing we’re already fully self sufficient on renewable energy in Norway then. So we don’t even have to actually have to build these windmills. Nature has value too. Nature disappearing is actually a huge problem in Norway.

            • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Are you totally self sufficient? I thought a lot of the social programs are supported by the sales of natural gas.

              • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                You’re wrong. All the revenue is sent to our sovereign wealth fund, which is mostly just left alone.

                Plus stopping our gas exports will just make everything worse, since Germany is addicted to natural gas and lignite coal.

      • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s funded on hydropower. We were well of when we found oil. The oil money is mostly just reinvested in a sovereign wealth fund. The oil money doesn’t hurt though.