OpenAI boss Sam Altman wants $7tn. For all our sakes, pray he doesn’t get it::The man behind ChatGPT is wooing the UAE to invest in energy-hungry AI. But if it turns out his tech can’t fix the world, he’s got his escape plan

  • Wytch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tech billionaires trying to solve the world’s problems is a bit like a cancer trying to save its host from organ failure

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      8 months ago

      they are not trying to solve anything really, they just think they are the next best thing earth has ever seen so they have the right to do everything

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m working with a douchebag billionaire directly right now on a complex project related to the ransomware encryption of a healthcare provider. Because he’s part of the private equity firm and a billionaire, he thinks he knows how to drive the resolution better than I and my team of techs do.

        All he does is drag me into more meetings and force me to get my techs to do shit that’s not conducive to restoring their systems.

        He’s a giant waste of self aggrandized trash.

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m not 100% sure what you mean by that, but I’m trying to say that, if Altman is a problem due to his wealth, then the bar to becoming a problem is substantially lower than a billion dollars.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That poster is not implying he’s a tech billionaire, he’s saying tech billionaires are jerking themselves off to throw money at AI because it’s good for business.

  • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m glad perspectives has stopped treating Sam Altman like a tech God. dude is second coming of every FAANG CEO and Elon combined. there’s no way that guy isnt up to no good.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        The problem is they went about it in a profoundly stupid way. The way they acted made it seem like he done something explicit and then they refused to actually elaborate. We still don’t know what really happened.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        oh they absolutely were. just how that shitshow went down with the M$ offers and the decision reversal showed that it was power politics in play to kill reason

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have no patience for things I’m not interested in: parties, most people. When someone examines a photo and says, ‘Oh, he’s feeling this and this and this,’ all these subtle emotions, I look on with alien intrigue.

    Is he describing sociopathy?

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just confirming he has what it takes to be CEO. I wonder if there are other skills or that’s it.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Definitely the guy we want running the company that decides what the human race needs from computers, then.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is that “it” talking about itself? Then don’t let it bullshit you, it’s trying to communicate, but by being manipulative. So ignore it.

  • SketchySeaBeast@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    If he wants $7tn, he better pay for all the content he stole to do it. Fuck these guys, wanting to become unfathomably rich off other people’s labour.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      A phone is a product, and it solves a lot of problems.

      I used to print out mapquest directions to wherever I drove. Now I can just use navigation so I seldom miss turns on dark streets anymore.

      Products can solve problems, that’s why people pay for them

      • Haagel@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think they mean existential problems, like our belligerent lumbering towards the violent self-destruction of humanity.

        • Digital_man@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is exactly what I meant.

          A product is something created by an organization ( in our case corporations) to make money. Period.

          The fact it can make our lives easier is a secondary side effect. The way these products are made can ( and usually do) exacerbate our problems.

          Solutions ? Nah.

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The US collects about 5 trillion in revenue a year. This fucker wants a budget on the scale of the biggest revenue of a country on earth. That’s more power than the president has. Fuck this guy. Nobody deserves that much trust.

  • jan teli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Bruh
    I’d be jumping on the ceiling with 700 AUD. The hell is he gonna do with 7000000000000 USD?

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    All AI needs to be shut the fuck down until it can be properly regulated. Making up the rules as we go is just fucking stupid.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Who are you expecting to regulate it? How are you envisioning those regulations working? Who and how is that getting enforced?

      It’s like trying to regulate 3D printing. Sure, you can probably find some agency that can pretend to be in charge, but unless they have monitoring software installed on every 3D printer including consumer and DIY units, they aren’t going to know what anyone does in their basement.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bribes are the only way to get their attention since they don’t read their emails

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’ll be shut down for decades then. Governments around the world are dynamically doing bugger all about it.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Problem there is that we don’t really don’t know what rules we need until we mind of have it. Governments do need to be much faster with making these rules when they appear needed, though, and AI companies should require a LOT more government supervision.