TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 months agoSo, anyway...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1758arrow-down120
arrow-up1738arrow-down1imageSo, anyway...lemmy.worldTokenBoomer@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squaresnooggums@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down3·4 months agoWhile this is technically true, we wouldn’t be such a strain on the ecosystem if we didn’t consume so much per person.
minus-squarefunkajunk@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·4 months agoI’m not burning down the amazon so I can make more money on palm oil. There is such a thing as “supply and demand” , but consumerist culture originates from the top, not the bottom.
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 months agoIsn’t that exactly what is said? The growth of people x consumption is finite and there needs to be a system change to represent that. It does not specify how the factors are balanced in relation to each other.
While this is technically true, we wouldn’t be such a strain on the ecosystem if we didn’t consume so much per person.
I’m not burning down the amazon so I can make more money on palm oil.
There is such a thing as “supply and demand” , but consumerist culture originates from the top, not the bottom.
Isn’t that exactly what is said? The growth of people x consumption is finite and there needs to be a system change to represent that. It does not specify how the factors are balanced in relation to each other.