• Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The irony of their efforts is that it only proved to show that they could easily begin influencing users which is the key argument being used against them.

    I’m still not sure what my feelings on the subject are. I don’t use the app myself, but besides its connection to a company in China and, therefore, the Chinese government, it seems to do the same exact tracking and algorithm manipulating that every other social network does.

    • birthday_attack@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      TikTok has always been on the extreme end of tracking and surveilling its users. For example, research found that the app had the ability to record all keystrokes made by users in the in-app browser (i.e. keylogging). This kind of tracking is way beyond what other social media companies do and borders on malware.That’s one reason why the US, Canada, and others banned the use of TikTok on government devices.

      A former TikTok employee also alleges in a sworn statement that TikTok stores its user data in China, that the CCP has full access to this data, and that the CCP used this data to spy on protestors in Hong Kong.

      So their tracking goes way beyond what other companies do, and China uses that data for expressly political goals rather than simply selling ads to users.

        • birthday_attack@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The paper states that they studied the HTML form element interactions but “not the keystrokes or content.”

          There’s a big difference. Both are more invasive than we would like, but grabbing everything you type while in the app’s browser is much worse than measuring a true or false “did this person submit their comment or did they give up and leave it unsubmitted.”

          Tiktok is getting the content of the text, which could be sensitive info, and it grabs from every site you visit, not just the social platform itself.

          But I think the main issue is using the data for allegedly targeting of protestors and Chinese political opponents, more than the depth of the data collection itself.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Facebook and google track users across the entire web using widgets that other sites choose to embed.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          logging statuses that were typed out, but ultimately not posted.

          That’s common practice across the web. For example in a lot of social networks (not Lemmy) if I were to close this reply box without clicking the “Reply” button, I’d simply be able to open it and my half written reply would be restored.

          It’s not about gathering data on users, it’s about saving users from accidental deletion particularly on touch screens where it’s so easy to accidentally brush the wrong button.

          Also I’d argue anything you intentionally type into a facebook status message box, is something you’re happy to share with facebook and everyone on your social network. There’s no expectation of privacy and we self sensor what we type into that box.

          Logging key strokes is different, there’s no reason to record that anything you record (other than actually typing messages) is likely to be something the user intended to type somewhere else but didn’t realise which browser window had keyboard focus.

          They would be picking up all kinds of things including passwords.

          • heartpatcher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If I were to close this reply box without clicking the “Reply” button, I’d simply be able to open it and my half-written reply would be restored.

            That does not require logging. You can use local storage.

    • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I definitely see issues with how it targets young people so aggressively and can have a huge negative impact on their mental health. China can essentially use it as a tool to lower the mental health of our youth and spread misinformation on purpose. The fact that the version available in China emphasizes educational content and limits usage per day shows that they know exactly what they are doing with the international versions.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ties not just to “a company in China”, but directly to the Chinese government.

      For better or worse, and how other US platforms operate, Tik Tok is controlled by a hostile (to the US) nation state.

      Keep in mind that China also blocks many US company products/platforms for their own reasons, so this is not at all a surprise.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    my teaching thrives on TikTok

    If a teacher mandates students to stream lectures over TikTok, I’m raising a formal complaint. There is at least a dozen better options.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think they’re using “teaching” here in a way neither you nor I would. Because there’s no way they can put any lessons in front of the right students. That’s the algorithms decision. And those signs reek of astroturfing.

      • darthskull@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You know you can follow people on tiktok right? The “following” page only shows peoples videos you follow in the order in which they were uploaded

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I follow mainly therapists and pet behaviorists on TikTok so my take is the teaching thrives through regular user engagement. I can imagine a teacher letting students know they have a page and getting their start that way, too. It has its risks but it’s really helped supplement my education.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    American phones were geolocated and TikTok users were locked out of the platform until they called their members of Congress.

    Holy shit. Is that true?

    They should be banned today if that’s real.

    • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      When contacted about those allegations by the BBC, TikTok provided the statement: “With regards to users being locked out of the app until they called, that is false. All users had two methods for dismissing the notifications.”

      Probably the usual hidden grey button “dismiss” over greyish background, just as Google, Microsoft and some other do.

    • mochisuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      If it were true yeah. In reality they are just shitting themselves because people on TikTok are broadcasting the genocide funded by US tax dollars and literally using American made bombs

        • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Common fucking sense. There’s no technical mechanism they could use to lock you out of the app until they confirmed you made a phone call. How did all these grandpa’s get here?

  • marx2k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Question…

    I don’t use tiktok. I have a Twitter account. Why is tiktok bad while a privately owned social media platform (twitter) that’s partially financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar not bad?

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Twitter / X gets railed on nonstop. Where are you getting the idea that anyone thinks it’s not “bad”?!

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        To me, that’s the only complaint I have about this, that they’re singling out Tiktok.

        But, im not against it because the US has always singled out “the biggest guy” to set a precedent, which then causes all tbe smaller social media platforms to get their shit together. From Microsoft, to Google, to Facebook.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      For example — last year they sent what a spy balloon over the USA in what a lot of experts believe was a test of US defence systems - weapons used to shoot down the balloon had never been used before outside of top secret test facilities. And that balloon was covered in high tech sensors and almost certainly broadcasting data in real time. There’s no plausible explanation for the incident other than to find out how the US would respond.

      Why does China want to know how US defence systems work? A lot of people already think there’s a chance of war between the two super powers. That balloon incident didn’t help things.

      And what went viral on TikTok? Claims that the balloon was a actually flying over Canada and never went near US soil. Claims that it was launched by kids in the USA. Where did those claims originate from? Nobody knows, but it seems pretty coincidental. These claims were spread on other social networks too - but they went viral on TikTok alone.

      That’s not the only incident, it’s just one of the most recent one that involved TikTok. Others have been far more serious especially in busy international waters south of China.

      If Twitter’s financial backing by Saudi Arabia/Qatar is ever a concern, I’m sure the US will act on that as well.

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Spy balloon update

        Later Thursday, Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said that the balloon not only did not transmit data back to China – it never collected any.

        “We’re aware that it had intelligence collection capabilities, but it was our – and it has been our – assessment now that it did not collect while it was transiting the United States,” Ryder said

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s because the next couple balloons were launched by schools in the US and Canada. There was more than one balloon.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I personally don’t really mind TikTok. But the algorithm is a bit too addictive. The short form 30 second content consumption format is slowly eroding our attention span.

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      it’s not. all social media has the same risks but tiktok is obviously the worst because it’s Chinese.

      I guess a video platform with content identical to youtube is bad if it’s Chinese.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Well, it is slightly different. The reason TikTok poses a different type of problem with people’s addiction is the tailoring of the content.

        All social media uses a basic port for people to come on and find others, but mainly create their own space. And even that was addictive and harmful to mental health. Not to mention proved a great way to manipulate people. But it also gave people a route to alter their interactions with the app—to a degree.

        TikTok, on the other hand, tailors everything that happens when you open the app. You don’t get to follow people, change the flavor of content you’re seeing. You open the app, and the algorithm is all that dictates what you’re scrolling through.

        I don’t know where I stand on this. I think all social media should die out. It’s killing discourse, it’s creating hate, it’s misinforming people like never before. It’s radicalizing people and generally making everyone stupider and less able to conceive of, let alone discuss nuance. And without nuance, we are truly fucking doomed. It’s far too easy to manipulate people with regular social media, and TikTok has turned all of those problems into an art form. It’s literally like a perfect little brainwashing machine. I’ve seen people use it on the train. They’re like…zombies.

        On the other, it’s shocking to me to see a representative claim that having their constituents…call their offices and, yknow, participate in the process is portrayed as being “weaponized against America.”

        It’s like a rock and a hard place. Firstly, TikTok is poisoning the minds of people. It’s like social media on steroids, and social media was already having a profoundly negative effect. On the other, it’s always dicey when taking things away from people “for the good of America.” Like…where was this attitude when instagram and Facebook were weaponized against the American people? Like, didn’t they prove it was used to sway elections here and in the UK? Why the uneven hand? Because they like demonizing foreigners and they protect white rich people weaponizing their wealth.

        So yeah, maybe it’s the right move, but in context, it’s so blatantly favoritism shown to the evil fuckers causing harm for their own ends.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          actually you do get to tailor your experience on tiktok. you can absolutely follow people. you even have the option to have the algorithm that’s tailored to your liked content (fyp) or specifically look at a feed of your followed accounts.

          You said that tiktok tailors every bit of what happens on the app.

          I have some news for you… so does youtube and every other social media platform out there.

          people who don’t use tiktok seem to not really understand that 95% of the content on it is from youtube or shares creator spaces with youtube and other social media. my fyp and follows are mostly artists, musicians, funny people, animal videos and I even get some news as well.

          tiktok is weirdly villanized by those that don’t even use the app.

          I agree with you that social media is bad, but tiktok isn’t really the world ending propaganda machine it’s portrayed to be. I don’t know if I’d consider funny videos and anime edits to be “poisoning the minds of people”.

          • eclipse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            My problem is with the influence that a hostile foreign state actor has with TikTok.

            Google is an independent company; I’m 99% certain their motivation is to make money and I’m confident their algorithms are tailored purely for engagement and profit. Whilst I’m sure they have some back room deals with US intelligence organisations I suspect that it’s a case of providing data vs providing influence (though I would not rule it out).

            TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government. That’s not up for debate; if you have an entity in China it has to work that way. Imagine the damage they could do if they actively decided to increase, for example, messages of reunification with Taiwan in their algorithm by just 1% on a global scale. That frightens me and I’m not convinced it isn’t happening already on specific topics of concern to China’s foreign policy.

            And that’s putting aside the amount of data that the Chinese are getting without even exerting any influence. They can likely discern worldwide sentiment on a range of topics and adjust political posture accordingly.

            I’m not saying Google is perfect. I hate social media in general for the way it’s warping the zeitgeist. But I personally consider TikTok to be a huge threat to the world.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Tik tok spies much more

        I forgot the link but I recall in android it shows it can have a shit ton of permissions

  • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    that is the most hilarious unorganic protest I think I’ve seen. I hope they at least got paid well

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not to be that guy but is there even any vertical video social media that currently provides what TikTok does as an exact competitor?

    Youtube shorts is so horrendous I have it blocked via revanced.

    This seems more like an excuse to get rid of competition than spyware allegations. It’s not like CISA has some big report on TikTok software dump. Everything they do is mirrored by Facebook down to the COPPA violations that congress doesn’t seem to care Zuck is abusing.

      • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is a huge lack of quality content compared to tiktok. And it’s algorithm is horrendous.

        Despite spending months trying to get YouTube to NOT show me far right, conservative, police loving, religious, or bigoted content, I still see it every once in a while. I’ve reported content, downvoted, selected ‘I’m not interested’ and nothing works.

        There was a video from a lawyer about a black woman telling her child it’s ok to take the entire Halloween candy bowl and if legally that’s stealing.

        Almost every other comment was some form of “well what do you expect from those people” or “it’s always the one you expect the most” or just straight up slurs. So many racist ‘jokes’ and I spent an hour just reporting comments.

        Another video of a person driving through protestors blocking the road. Controversial and frustrating, I understand. But almost every comment was “the protestors deserve it” or “I’d drive through them too” and some real sociopathic shit.

        And almost all the ads are horrendous. Literally Joe Rogan brain supplements, trashy weight loss, sketchy ai read ‘science’ on what doctors don’t want to to know. I would rather hear about Raid Shadow Legends.

        I’ve found a couple gems in the mix, actual content creators that are funny or interesting. But almost all of them are also on TikTok too so there’s no reason to torture myself scrolling through a post apocalyptic wasteland. And there are so many quality creators on TikTok that aren’t on YouTube.

        I believe a big part of it is (from what I’ve heard) TikTok has the best creator fund for paying the people who make videos. So without an outright ban, there’s no reason for them to switch. Really, this would be an absolutely huge win for YouTube/Google. And as much as I distrust TikTok, it would be a loss for creators and viewers. At least imo

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      CISA’s director literally just testified to congress about China fucking with shit.

      Also, I see Instagram reels as a competitor.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Florida Congressman Neal Dunn’s office told the BBC it has received more than 900 calls from TikTokers, “many of which were vulnerable school-aged children” and some of whose extreme rhetoric had to be flagged for security reasons.

    Lawmakers have long accused ByteDance of having links to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and have cast the video-sharing app as a potential threat to Americans’ privacy and mental health.

    Carlos Gimenez, who sits alongside Mr Dunn on the House committee behind the bill, said he would not be deterred from voting for it “regardless of TikTok’s targeted campaign against members of Congress”.

    A spokesperson for New York Democrat Ritchie Torres - a joint leader of the legislation - confirmed that his office too has received “seemingly endless calls” though none were of a threatening nature.

    “I am deeply troubled by reports of young people calling Congress, threatening to commit suicide or otherwise harm themselves,” Mr Torres said in a statement to the BBC.

    Mr Johnson, a South Dakota Republican, has been outspoken about the national security threat posed by TikTok and is supportive of the proposed bill, “so it’s certainly possible that our office is targeted because of those things”, his spokesperson added.


    The original article contains 712 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Edit: I’m an idiot and can’t read: I thought this was referring to backfiring on the reps, not TikTok. Original comment remains below:

    The BBC should settle down lol, it didn’t backfire. Some group of aides took 900 calls, probably tallied it up on a few sticky notes, and passed them to a rep who tossed it in a bin.

    1. it unanimously passed committee (!!!)

    2. it’s practically certain to pass the house

    3. it’s practically certain to pass the senate

    4. it’s guaranteed to be signed by biden

    • hoot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sounds like a backfire to me. Did you read the article? The lobbying was from TikTok to prevent the bill from passing, but it sounds like it just made the reps more committed to passing it.

      • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah I completely derped on who this backfired on… That explains my confusion 😂 the rest of my comment remains relevant after the first sentence

  • Eggyhead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I stay largely uninvolved with social media apps outside of this fediverse project, but why is it that bytedance must divest TikTok while meta is free to keep Facebook and Instagram? Aren’t the risks to mental health and security the same?

    • AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Meta isn’t heavily influenced by a government adversarial to that of the US, so the risks to US security are not the same.
      The mental health risk looks pretty similar, though.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I remember two decades ago when the US was screaming about the “great firewall of China” and how they should open up their internet to companies like Google. What made the US change their mind since then?

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          They didn’t? The CCP happily allows the export of potentially nefarious internet products, but they still don’t allow the uncensored internet in.

          • aufheben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think in the US we’re basically going to end up doing, while not the exact same thing, something similar. Probably in the name of combating “disinformation.”

  • Clot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    How dumb you can be protesting for a chinese spyware which is destroying IQ of children, americans.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      BLEEP BLOOP you sound programed. The government doesn’t like that there’s a media source that they can’t control.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t get why China has anything to do with it. Isn’t it out of Singapore?

    • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      The parent company of TikTok is ByteDance which is a company based in China. But TikTok as a company isn’t based in China.

      From its Wiki:

      Its parent company, Beijing-based ByteDance, is owned by founders and Chinese investors (20%), other global investors (60%), and employees (20%). TikTok Ltd owns four entities that are based respectively in the United States, Australia (which also runs the New Zealand business), United Kingdom (also owns subsidiaries in the European Union), and Singapore (owns operations in Southeast Asia and India).

      TikTok says that since 2020, the US based CEO is responsible for making important decisions. However, multiple reports claim that there is little functional separation between TikTok and its Beijing-based executives and software developers. TikTok has been noted for downplaying its connection with ByteDance and for eschewing questions about its relationship with the Chinese government.