What is the difference between cellular data being used on my phone and cellular data being used on my notebook? Data is data.

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is one of those ‘innovations’ people mean when they say capitalism drives innovation. Not the hotspot, the pointless extra charge for something your phone can just do on its own.

  • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    How do they know if the source of data is hotspot? I’d imagine there is a way to stop your phone grassing on you.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There’s different internal network configs (APNs), and hotspot uses a different one than regular mobile data. ( or at least it used to). Those can be configured and metered separately from the carrier’s end.

      LineageOS, and maybe some other custom ROMs, wouldn’t do that and would put the hotspot and mobile data on the same APN to get around that.

          • silent_squirrel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can lock the bootloader again after the flashing process is done(because it will add the signing key of the new OS), but unfortunately the NFC Payments in Google Pay still won’t work because Google only allows it on ‘certified’ Android systems (aka only the preinstalled OS)

          • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can in theory still use Google Pay with a Magisk module called Play Integrity Fix and using a fingerprint from a different phone to pass Basic and Device integrity. I’m currently doing it on my Pixel 7 Pro.

            But it has a steep learning curve and is a temporary solution that will disappear in roughly a year once Google sunsets legacy integrity methods and starts requiring Strong integrity, which can’t be faked under known methods. Google is also actively disabling fingerprints that are being spoofed, making the whole thing frustrating and even more temporary even when it works.

            Just let us use our devices, sheesh.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ugh. I was dumb and got a Samsung that was offered to me for cheap on the spot. If I had done any research I would have learned that there’s no alternative OS options. Now I’m stuck with it, because I’m poor, so I just try to avoid using it. I should keep an eye out for something used that’s compatible.

          • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            While it’s not at the same level as Graphene OS, Samsung is pretty well supported by Lineage OS. AFAIK at least in Europe Samsung phones have an unlockable bootloader, but YMMV.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Nah. Nobody’s figured out how to access the ROM on my specific model, unfortunately, and I’m 900% sure Canadian telecom oligopolists will not be cool about unlocking like that.

              In my defense, if it was a laptop it would have been much less foolhardy.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Even on my unlocked, non vendor phone it seems to not recognize hotspot data as different for some reason.

    • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Back when they just began recognizing it, they noted peculiar traffic. Desktop websites, batch downloads normally unavailable to that system. This assumes that you utilized the internal hotspot system and didn’t create a separate one. Now? Not sure whether their system is more robust but it should, theoretically, be possible to obfuscate your traffic using third party hotspot software. No clue where to look for that anymore.

      • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I used to routinely use 100gb of data on my jailbroken sprint iPhone. Did that for almost 3 years. Never heard a peep from them. But this was forever ago.

        • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you used the package I think you did, that’s not unusual. Absolutely will not remember the name but there were numerous tweaks that just flipped the hotspot switch but a couple that allowed you to use a hotspot without directly using the inbuilt function. One was free and broadly used.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That was great, and you didn’t have to pay some extra tethering fee every month either (or something like that, it was so long ago for me).

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you root your phone and install a custom rom, you can get around it and they can’t tell.

      If you’re factory, it sends that hotspot info to them.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah, installing a new OS on a phone isn’t something you do easily like on a PC.

          You have to unlock the bootloader, which requires an unlock code from the manufacturer, then you have to factory reset it, and that’s even if your phone/carrier allows it. Many don’t (which is why it’s so hard for me to replace my phone…grrr).

          So yeah, installing a new OS on your phone is typically going to require quite a bit of effort and some level of commitment as well as a device that’s bootloader unlockable and supported by an alternate OS (each device and model requires a custom build).

          It’s…a whole thing. It really shouldn’t be, but it is :(

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            and that’s even if your phone/carrier allows it.

            This is why you should buy the phone outright yourself then get a SIM only deal, rather than paying for your phone in contract.

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah I do, but SIM unlocked and bootloader unlockable are two different things. Sadly, not every phone (or even the same phones made for different carriers) are allowed to be bootloader unlocked; I have no idea why, but it is and sucks.

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yeah it’s definitely true, even with the same manufacturer it can be hit and miss. You gotta do your research before you buy.

          • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I haven’t done it in a while, but it kinda depends on the phone, some were very easy to flash in the earlier days of Android.

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah, my old Moto Play G4 was a breeze. Wasn’t quite “Press any key to continue” but not much more difficult.

              My OnePlus was a little more work, but that was mostly because of the OP website acting up and refusing to generate my bootloader unlock key. Also had to do things differently since it didn’t have an SD card to hold my install stuff like the Moto Play did.

              • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                I had one where you could literally run an app on the phone, no ADB or anything. Can’t remember what phone it was now but it might’ve actually been a Moto Droid

                • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  One one hand, that sounds extremely convenient. On the other, I shudder thinking what a malicious app could do with that 😆

                  Edit: Unless you’re talking about doing it through TWRP. I had to flash that over fastboot, but once installed to the recovery partition, I could boot into that and install the rest of Lineage and extra packages straight from the SD card. Updating the system was just downloading the new Lineage .zip to the SD card, booting into TWRP, and clicking install.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe, but it’s not worth it just for a few days, which is all I’ll need it for. I just forked over $15 for another 10 gb.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s worth it for more than a few days, custom ROMs ftw.

            Personally my minimum features are:

            • Long press back button to force close and kill an app.
            • Call recording.

            All the other stuff and customisation is just tasty gravy.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            negotiate. i called my last carrier from my new carriers retail store front. they practically begged me to stay and said they’d give me everything i asked for.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    What is the difference between cellular data being used on my phone and cellular data being used on my notebook?

    The difference is the cellular company’s profits amount.

    • Oneobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      They had this restriction in the UK where the networks would prevent hotspots from actually working. You had to buy a special additional package.

      Restriction has now vanished and there are no such limits on usage. Not sure if the Regulator intervened but it was most certainly a cash grab.

      These days they still manage to rip us off by annual contract increases of RPI+3.9%. That applies even during a 2 year contract.

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think this is also an archaic model from before smart phones and the early days of smart phones. In the early days of apps, most attempted to limit data usage because most network providers charged a premium for data and the networks were much slower and smaller.

      While you could tether in these early days, even before smart phones, the computer was capable of much higher data usage than the phone. These limits were put in place to protect a network that wasn’t really built for this level of load.

      Old rules with good purpose turned into a way to charge more money.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve had great success getting around these restrictions.

    CalyxOS + Always on VPN (mullvad)

    The secret sauce is using a Android version that allows you to share your VPN with hotspotting. I believe only calyxos and lineage allow you to do this. Since the VPN client is running on the phone, all the traffic that originates from the phone will look like phone data, with the appropriate time to live, OS fingerprinting, etc.

    This can’t be done on stock Android, because it does not allow the VPN to be shared over tethering. So tethering traffic will not getting capsulated on the VPN client. There’s a security argument for this, but I prefer the user flexibility of allowing all the traffic to get VPNed.

    It’s still possible to do this without VPN sharing on the phone, you can use normal tethering on a unlocked phone, like stock Android. You just have to modify the traffic signature to look like whatever the carrier is looking for. Setting the appropriate time to live, using a VPN, and doing other OS fingerprinting tricks to keep the traffic consistent. It’s much easier to use a ROM that lets you share the VPN

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Great tip.

      Time to live (TTL) or hop limit is a mechanism which limits the lifespan or lifetime of data in a computer or network. TTL may be implemented as a counter or timestamp attached to or embedded in the data. Once the prescribed event count or timespan has elapsed, data is discarded or revalidated. In computer networking, TTL prevents a data packet from circulating indefinitely. In computing applications, TTL is commonly used to improve the performance and manage the caching of data.

      Hmm kinda makes sense

      • Laser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I had a provider before that blocked tethering and hotspot, the solution there was also to increase TTL on the clients connecting to the phone by 1. The phone would lower it by 1 again, making it look like data originated from there.

      • OmanMkII@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s possible to track the number of hops that a device on a network has, since TTL will be 8-bit numbers (and ususally start at 64, 128, etc.) if the TTL of a packet has 64 from the main device, the devices it’s sharing with will be 63 (and so on un the chain for N+1 hops). This may not be exactly how they do it since device fingerprinting would be way simpler, but it is a plausible way of tracking that a device is using a hotspot.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    My ISP’s a dick, but to my knowledge, unlimited has to mean unlimited around here. There where months where we had Problems with our fibre, so I did everything over a hotspot from my phone. Used 100’s of GB’s no one ever complained.

    Get proper consumer protection laws, people.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      unlimited has to mean unlimited around here.

      This is the case in a lot of countries. In Australia, some ISPs got fined a lot of money (something like $300,000 I think?) because they advertised mobile phone plans as “unlimited” when in reality they slowed down the speed once you hit a limit.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          it’s not especially in the US, i’ve seen ISPs essentially break kneecaps forcing the consume to pay for the initial hook up, and then immediately rolling it out to every available house in the subdivision or neighborhood.

          That shit should be illegal. If you do the math on how long it would take to profit from running it yourself it’s only a few years given an ENTIRE neighborhood.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          The maximum ISPs could be fined for misleading/deceptive conduct (including things like this) was $1.1 million at the time, and I don’t think they considered this bad enough to hand out the maximum fine. They bumped the maximum to $10 million at some point afterwards though.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Get proper consumer protection laws, people.

      And if you’re homeless, just buy a house 🫶

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Get proper consumer protection laws, people.

      California is trying its best, but I’m not sure the other US states will get onboard (except New York, and maybe Oregon and Washington state).

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah. I mean, the state I live in right now just passed a bill to forbid officers of the state from using gender neutral, but technically grammatically incorrect language, while the ruling party is campaigning on not being a party of bans, while claiming their rivals are, so things aren’t all that green here either.

        I say take the wins you can get.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 months ago

    Which is bullshit. Who cares if you download something at full speed on your phone or through the hotpot? A bit is a bit, doesn’t matter where it ends up when received by the phone’s modem.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a sneaky way of having a bandwidth cap without having a bandwidth cap. Mobile devices have smaller storage, so you’re less likely to use as much bandwidth compared to a laptop. Also a single device going to use less data than multiple devices sharing a hotspot.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Jokes on them, I have a 512GB micrSD card and I use Termux to archive videos through YT-DLP.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Was just going to say… my phone has 512GB storage and can do direct WiFi file transfer to my computer without a hotspot. All without using the mobile hotspot feature.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can burn through a huge amount of data streaming 4K video on your phone without using any storage. You can also plug a 20TB USB hard drive into your phone, connect to a VPN and torrent away.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      The carrier who’s paying for your traffic. You’re most likely going to use a lot more data on a computer than actually on your phone.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean let’s be real, it’s incredibly complex and amazing technology. Borderline magic. And depending on where you are, yeah consistently using large amounts of bandwidth can and will impact other users.

          So a policy like this makes sense, to a point. It’s when they auto charge you for hitting a “limit” that grinds my gears.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            And I’m sure we can all acknowledge what would happen to prices if there were zero restrictions. A top budget blogger tip would be “stop paying for your expensive broadband service! Plug your phone in and tap “hotspot” in settings to save $50-$100 a month.“

            Normies (grandmas using Facebook, not WFHers/gamers) would be frivolous to pay for two “equivalent” Internet services.

            (Before you think me a corporate lobbyist, know I submitted a complaint to the FCC when Comcast first implemented broadband bandwidth caps in the USA. Saw that BS in Canada.)

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it’s an android phone, enable dev mode, install adb on your laptop, run an sshd under termux on the phone, and you should be able to set up iptables to forward packets from the laptop through the phone. The phone won’t know that it’s being used for tethering. Although I hadn’t seen the stuff about packet TTL before. Maybe it’s as simple as just adjusting that.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      A less complicated method that I used for years:

      • Install SimpleSSHD on your phone
      • If you’re running Windows, install PuTTY on your PC
      • Connect to SimpleSSHD through PuTTY/ssh and set a parameter for dynamic forwarding (CLI option is -D 8888)
      • Set your web browser or application to use SOCKS5 proxy at localhost port 8888

      It doesn’t redirect all traffic (you’d want to avoid system updates, for example) but might be easier than messing with iptables.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It may be easier to just run a VPN on the phone and route the traffic through it? WireGuard runs on Android. I’ve never tried configuring it to forward data through it though, but it should work.

        • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I tried that, the carrier could still differentiate it from local traffic (or at least my speed test results were vastly different).

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s possible they’ve gotten smarter these days.

            I don’t know how ISPs are allowed to do this when it’s a very obvious violation of net neutrality.

            • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              If I recall correctly, they justify it by claiming they need to do deep packet inspection to balance traffic. There’s a fuzzy line between them needing to optimize their network equipment and respecting privacy, and the rulings seem to favor the former.

      • Armageddon@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is what I’ve been using and it works for the most part other than the connection just dropping with too much use, only other thing I’ve used is PairVPN which had the same problem but was 100x worse. Is there something better around nowadays? I have a carrier locked phone and can’t ROM or root

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well that’s because, fuck you pay me those are special data packets.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Att et al keeps throwing around the word ‘unlimited’. I actually had a conversation with Verizon, before I dropped them, and actually used this exact quote to the guy…

    He was like, “princess bride. Nice. But, yeah, I have to read the script.”

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s a really weird and very American problem. Our home broadband either doesn’t exist or is really expensive in any given market, and tends to have clauses, conditions, etc. Like Comcrap limiting people to 1TB/mon (very easy to burn through quickly by just watching some television programs) unless they pay more for “unlimited”. People, as taught by Capitalism, hunt for the best deals. Paying one bill instead of two saves money. Some have light enough home Internet requirements that they don’t need expensive home broadband.

    Then the companies get pissed that we’re doing what we are supposed to do, find the best deal for our needs, so they set up false gates to make sure we follow the path they want us to follow. Then they pay off the regulatory agencies to allow terms like “unlimited” mean not unlimited, 3G HSPA+ being known as 4G. 4G being known as LTE, 4GLTE or 5Ge. 5G being known as 5G, 5G+, 5GUW, 5GUC, (even though, with the exception of T-Mobile in many markets, that 5G will actually be non-standalone and anchored to an LTE packet core, not 5G SA) and all the other damn arbitrary marketing buzzwords. All of which really mean nothing because the 5G spec allows a carrier to flip on the 5G availability flag on a phone even if 5G doesn’t exist in your market.

    Most of this, AT&T is the biggest perpetrator of by far. Especially the lying about 5G.

    The rules are all made up, nothing is real. Time for the arbitrary monthly bill increase for no reason! Pay up, chump!

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I still feel like I should be able to sue AT&T for claiming my hotspot is “unlimited,” but after 15 gb it drops to double digit kbps. Seems like that’s a pretty hard limit

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Especially given:

        • Limited to 15GB
        • Then limited to 128kbps

        The 15GB is going to be variable based on the link speed available. If full 5G, that can be erased with 15 speed tests in a few minutes.

        From there, it’s 128kbps * 3600 (to hours) * 24 (to days) * 30 (to month) = 331,776,000 kilobits -> 41.472GB + the original 15GB -> 56.472GB is the limit each month for “unlimited”, roughly. A hard limited number.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          And some douchebag could come in and say “um, actually, it’s always going to be limited because the internet speed isn’t infinite” as if the 3TB my mobile data is capable of downloading at full speed is at all comparable to the 0.05TB I can get after they rate limit me

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep, lack of broadband in this AirBnB I’m staying in is the only reason I was using it as a hotspot in the first place. The speed here is about the speed they’d throttle it at. I kind of had to fork over the $15 or deal with slow internet one way or the other.

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        It always blows my mind going to a rental and the rental has no or lacking Internet. Yes, I’m probably on vacation, but it’s the future and life requires a few megabits. Years back I made it standard procedure to prep some kind of mobile broadband for my destination (buying a month of prepaid for a hotspot or whatever) fully expecting it to just always suck, it’s annoying that this is still a necessary procedure in 2024.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Unfortunately, I didn’t pick it. My mother is paying. And when I asked my mother if she looked to see on the AirBnB ad if this place had high speed internet, she said, “other ads did, but this one didn’t.” Sigh.

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Data is data in the same way water is water and electricity is electricity; nobody should have the power to dictate how you use it. I really wish we’d enshrine genuine net neutrality and shut this kind of nonsense down.

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Except there is not a physical commodity or production at the other end of which they are supplying me a portion of a finite amount. If they “pipe” is big enough to supply what is promised to every end user it is supplied to, the water company or power company can still run out of water or power if one person uses a ridiculous amount. The ISP can’t run out of “data”, they aren’t even supplying it - it comes from a host. The ISP is just responsible for running the cables, or “connecting the pipes”.

      The ISPs loves using the comparison to water or power, because you get charged more for using more of either and that is how they have convinced lawmakers (who are so old and out of touch they have no idea how the internet works) that using more data should cost more. They’ve convinced our lawmakers basically that they have a big “tank full of data” and if I use too much, there wont’ be any for my neighbors.

      The truth is they are selling me something they can’t provide - a 250Gbps “pipe” that can’t actually supply 250Gbps if everyone they sold it to wants to use it at the same time. They sell the same pipe to the whole neighborhood and blame the neighborhood when they try to use what they were told they bought.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 months ago

    you also have unlimited data, unless you hit a data cap, and then you hit a data rate limit, so technically your data is actually limited.

    Can we legislate these fucks to just actual provide the bandwidth they claim to? I.E. a max cap of the max bandwidth * the max amount of time it can be available for in a billing period. Anything else is fraud IMO.

    • Dettweiler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      We had legislation for this stuff. Then Trump put Shit Pai in the FCC chairman spot and proceeded to gut all of the net neutrality and consumer protection regulations.

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You see, this is why we need net neutrality

    EDIT: see, im glad someone else said it already

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Net neutrality really wouldn’t stop this, just make them reword the limit.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Use a VPN. ISP are being disingenuous when they claim a data connection is unlimited at the point of purchase and then slug us with restrictions when we try and use it. If they can detect a tether, the VPN should obscure it.