• Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      At the very least, I think Eurovision next month will get even more awkward than it was already set out to be.

        • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Good question. Some say boycott the whole show or just Israel’s song, I suppose you can boo if you’re on location or be loud in the chat on the official livestream, generally use the buzz on social media. Generally, they will be aware that people will want to register their disgust and will probably prepare themselves for that.

          I’d say generally, participate normally in Eurovision discussion and then make noise or boycott when it’s Israel’s turn. The media that love to report on the event, as it has a reach bigger than the Superbowl, will pick it up when it’s enough noise.

          Also watch out if some of the artists will say or do something. Iceland is always very itchy and gives no fucks.

          • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            you make some good points. It’s scandalous that Israel be allowed to participate to be honest. genocide does seem to go against some of the spirit of the show.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Pirate a stream of it or dont watch. Try to avoid creating buzz, no matter how small, on social media about the event as this helps them too. No ones gonna ask about how many negative comments they got when they brag about views and engagement numbers to their corporate funders when looking to sell ad space.

          • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would imagine the negative comments matter. some people might not understand the situation. there might be a lot of protest on the night and it might help contextualise it for some people.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Why risk a genocide-lover when you can have somebody who is guaranteed to be a genocide-lover?!

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          So far the score is 1-0 to Biden on supporting genocide.

          I hate the fucking Cheeto, but damned if that score doesn’t speak loudly

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            In a Fox News segment on Tuesday morning, former President Donald Trump appeared to suggest that he is supportive of the genocidal extermination of Palestinians living in Gaza.

            […]

            Kilmeade then asked Trump: “Are you on-board with the way the [Israel Defense Force] is taking the fight to Gaza?”

            […]

            Trump’s response seemed to suggest that he supported the genocide of people living in Gaza. “You’ve got to finish the problem,” he said.

            In additional comments regarding Israel’s attacks, Trump appeared unwilling to differentiate between the governing body of Hamas and the Palestinian population more generally. He went on to claim that, were he still president, the October 7 attack never would have happened, and that Hamas only attacked Israel because of Biden’s purported weakness.

            “They wouldn’t have done it to me, I guarantee you that,” Trump added.

            Trump literally thinks and says he’d be doing genocide better right now if he were still president.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    “unintentional harm to the members of WCK.”

    Pheeew! They were only harmed, not murdered.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      And it was totally unintentional. No way any one meant to hit them with those precision weapons.