• tearsintherain@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is even more concerning when you look at some of the motivations: “The bill was largely spurred by recent protests on university and college campuses across the country, including North Carolina-based schools, against the war in Gaza.”

    this is about control, fascism. historically student protests are the canary in the coal mine on a number of issues. powers that be are looking to stamp out any dissent going forward.

    • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago
      • Freedom not guaranteed. Subject to availability and restrictions at the time of issuance. Pursuant to obligations according to local regulations, your freedom may be more or less than the freedom implied. All rights reserved to freedom issuers. Freedom may be revoked at any time for any reason subject to local availability. Please visit your freedom office to dispute claims. Disputes may or may not be resolved at the freedom offices discretion, with resolutions including but not limited to the loss of additional freedom.
    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Land of the free

      You misunderstood, see it was “Land or the free”… and then they took all the land.

      img

    • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      In the article it says that immunocompromised people spoke during the public comments on the bill and Republican senators said that the bill would criminalize their wearing masks but they just won’t be prosecuted for it.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        So the law would demand it, but the “trust me bro, I got yo back” defense says to ignore what the law actually says?

        Okay, I think I will.:-P

  • Anise (they/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What about as a political statement? Isn’t that still protected speech? You republicans made masking/not masking a political act, don’t blame me.

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Here’s hoping the language isn’t so ambiguous that hospital workers will have to stop treating infectious people and surgeons aren’t having to consult with legal counsel on whether they can operate.

    In public… meaning public outside and not public areas of the hospital right? Ambulances? Do those count? Etc.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also illegal. Don’t worry though, the KKK is specifically listed as a group that can apply for an exemption. The reason that’s in there is because every version of the bill that explicitly listed the KKK as an organization that can’t apply for an exemption failed. I know this sounds like insane hyperbole and not something that actually happened, but that’s the state of things.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Do viruses control our Congress critters like the brain worms do?

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I reflexively down vote the term “congress critters”. It is basically the same as the “tea party”. It tells everyone how little you understand things.

      Just a stupid term wielded by folks to eventually let the worst amongst us yield control. Them critters gonna get us! It’s not a system of representative democracy where we elect those to represent us! They are critters!

      They’re just a bunch of critters! Not people, not criminal actors, just a bunch a squirrels!