The airline's attorneys wrote in an answer to the lawsuit involving the 9-year-old from Austin, “She knew or should have known [the compromised lavatory] contained a visible and illuminated recording device." But now, the airline says its outside legal counsel "made an error in the filing."
Whatever lawyer or lawyers thought “blame the victimized child” was a good defense strategy need to be disbarred.
Sorry, but If my employer asked me to defend a p3do and blame a 9-yo instead, I might just have to take that golden parachute. There are plenty of other high-paying corporate law positions out there.
“Look, Boeing offed a whistle blower. We can’t do worse than that, right?”