• eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Among the bill’s cosponsors is House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who recently told Politico, “I think it’s common sense that you can’t have the president sitting in the Oval Office worried about whether some lawyer or some local DA somewhere is going to go after him.”

    How is this common sense? Politicians are in urgent need of more fear of the law and voters.

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just common sense that there are two classes of people in the world. Those the law protects but does not bind, and those the law binds but does not protect.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you imagine if this was normalized for the president, and then over time became acceptable for other people?

      “You can’t have congress people worried about whether some lawyer will go after them.”

      “You can’t have CEO’s worried about whether the DA will go after them.”

      “You can’t expect your boss to worry about whether you will go after them.”

      “You can’t expect your pastor to worry about whether the faithless will go after them.”

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      In other words, “Let’s strip out one of the checks and balances built in to the country in order to ensure we get the very dictator king the founders sought to prevent.”

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re so out of touch with the rest of the world, they think they should be immune from prosecution.

      And yet they don’t seem to realize that most people think prison is the best place for all of them. Nobody gives a fuck about their well-being or their “worries.”

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ok but Biden still isn’t in Gaza to act as human shield which means I’m gonna vote for Trump, twice!

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Counter offer: Pass a law barring people facing felony charges from running for President.

    If it would keep you from owning a gun:

    ATF form 4473, line 21c and d:

    "c. Are you under indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could imprison you for more than one year, or are you a current member of the military who has been charged with violation(s) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whose charge(s) have been referred to a general court-martial?

    d. Have you ever been convicted in any court, including a military court, of a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could have imprisoned you for more than one year, even if you received a shorter sentence including probation?"

    Why should you be allowed the button? 🤔

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Super easy for those in power to keep their rivals from being able to run for office. Currently the president and afraid you’ll be unseated by the opposing party’s candidate? Just start an investigation on them! Boom, no more rivals.

        • ignirtoq@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Totally agree. These systems are critically important for our society. They need to be considered with care, and we need to be mindful of the complexities that come with any changes to them.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The real solution is you need a populace that is civically engaged and capable of enough critical thought to not fall for the right-wing fearmongering propaganda Fox, OAN, Newsmax, Murdoch, et al. spew out.

            • localme@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Bingo. A properly funded and functional public education system, that teaches real critical thinking and let’s include media literacy while we’re at it.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wouldn’t it take more than an investigation? A grand jury would need to sign off on the indictments.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    He wants a “too big to fail” law for politicians. Its so stupid and short sighted, but its an obvious result of a narcissist under pressure.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “I’d like to be able to commit unlimited acts that violate state laws, please.”

    What the literal fuck.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Republicans: “We see no problems with this whatsoever.”

      Remember: they aren’t arguing Trump didn’t break the law, they’re arguing that the Democrats are wrong to prosecute him for it.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        they’re arguing that the Democrats are wrong to prosecute him for it.

        Also worth saying that Democrats aren’t prosecuting him. This has been a recurring piece of disinformation spread by Republicans since the first official charge against Trump.

        He broke the law. The justice system is prosecuting him. Not Biden, not Democrats, but the judicial branch of the government.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So it sounds like they’re wording this that it would cover ‘former presidents’ so in theory Biden would also be protected. The GOP wouldn’t be able to go after him for their made up charges. Are they willing to protect Trump and not go after Biden? Probably, if it ensures Trump will be president again.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can they also pass a law forcing both Stormy Daniels and Hilary to suck him dry?

    Ofcourse once that written in the books, all we gotta do is go find a vampire and get him to bite Hilary and Stormy. Then my master evil plan would probably work.

    But whatever, sure, another trial? Yeah I’m sure we’ll get him this time! What did he do now? Run a red light? That’s 20 shots to the head if you’re a poor Mexican or black. But not previous Trump. He gets yet another trial. That’s what rich assholes get.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      fascists gonna fash. while you’re right about racial double standards, they go beyond that for the god emperor.

      they were just crying about an fbi raid supposedly being an assassination attempt, after his lawyers literally arguing that a president should be able to assassinate their opposition without repercussions.

      as long as the president is orange, i guess.

      • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        as long as the president is orange, i guess.

        Could we use this? Start a fake meme trend of ‘orange is the new black’ as if trump is trying to equate himself to minorities, and piss off both the WASP republicans and mock the idea of him even considering the similarities?