• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wow, I read the article, that law is some b*******. Those trucks are definitely safer than half of US vehicles on the road, and obviously much more practical

    • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      While this policy is bullshit, I’d firmly disagree that kei cars are safer than half of vehicles in the US.

      • They’re all right hand drive, which makes it harder to see other traffic and pedestrians. Their headlights are also aimed to illuminate the left shoulder in Japan. In the US, those headlights will blind oncoming drivers.
      • In order to be imported into the US, these kei cars are all 25 years old at least. Crash safety has improved a lot in that time. The slab fronts of these cars provide no crumple zone for occupants. Like many modern pickup trucks, a pedestrian will be crushed, rather than scooped onto the hood and windshield of a shorter car like a sedan.
      • Because of their age, many of these vehicles might not have ABS or airbags. Additionally, their age also will make them more likely to have a technical problem, which will be harder to solve since they’re JDM only vehicles.
      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So what’re ya gonna do, ban my 25-year-old US-market car next? 'Cause aside from the RHD headlight thing (which is a non-issue you can fix in 5 minutes with a screwdriver), they have all the same alleged problems.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I understand where you’re coming from, but

        • American vehicles are so tall and poorly designed they are traffic hazards just by existing. The danger of a less “robust” chassis on American roads comes from the outside threat of poor manufacturing and disproportionate inefficiencies of American auto manufacturing.

        • The build, visibility and reduced weight of kei trucks makes them safer than American vehicles.

        • American headlights are obscenely bright and kei truck headlights are not going to outshine bubbas ford firebeams any time soon.

        • 25 year old cars are generally easier and cheaper to work on because they were made to swap accessible, standard parts out easily. Not that these trucks quit easily in the first place. The American auto model looking down its nose at Japanese auto reliability is absurd.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “The build, visibility and reduced weight of kei trucks makes them safer than American vehicles.”

          Not for the occupant when in a collision with a vehicle made for the American market and not for pedestrians who, as mentioned before, are getting hit by what is basically a wall coming at them and it just so happens that said wall is a foot above the ground which changes the dynamic because the pedestrian will tend to end up under the vehicle.

          “25 year old cars are generally easier and cheaper to work on because they were made to swap accessible, standard parts out easily.”

          You’re talking about 25 years old vehicles never sold in North America to begin with, parts aren’t available at your local parts store unless you find an equivalent by looking on the web and then you’re relying on people having tried to come up with a solution before you.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Which market a vehicle is made for doesn’t affect its physical properties by location, the truck isn’t going to shape shift stateside because it’s from a different country.

            • A slimmer vehicle with better visibility and reduced weight has an easier time detecting threats or victims and brakes more effectively. It is a safer vehicle on the road.

            • Any threat of driving a kei truck is a result of irresponsible American auto manufacturing, the same way bulky American vehicles disproportionately threaten pedestrians and sedans.

            • Lot of incorrect assumptions on your part here; luckily, your misjudgments are irrelevant and we can address the salient fact that there are any number of reliable import shops for old-schoolers and countless websites where you can order these parts easily.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Which market a vehicle is made for doesn’t affect its physical properties

              At affects the physical properties of the vehicles around it as they weren’t built with the same standards in mind.

              brakes more effectively

              Wrong, brakes are proportional as well and it also vastly depends on contact patch, by your logic a motorcycle would outbrake a car, it doesn’t. A Bugatti Veyron weights 2200kg and goes 100 to 0 in 31.4 meters, a Toyota Corolla GR does the same in 34 meters even if it weights 285kg less.

              A kei car without airbags and no crumple zone at all isn’t safer than a regular car from the same era, let alone a modern car. A cab over wheel is more dangerous to pedestrians than anything else because it tends to draw them under the car. Modern cars are built with pedestrian safety regulations in mind, Kei cars weren’t.

              Lots of incorrect assumptions on your part here, but it’s always the same with people who don’t actually know anything about cars except that they just want to see them off the road.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                No it doesn’t. Haha, why are you- whatever, it’s funny.

                Anecdotes are fun and similarly irrelevant to general auto standards.

                And no, for regulatory, logical, and statistical sake, a cab over wheel in a properly manufactured vehicle is not more dangerous than a poorly manufactured American truck or SUV you literally cannot see the pedestrians in front of.

                I do appreciate your desperation in parroting my exact wording at the end here to try to pretend you aren’t playing make-believe with your anecdotes and errors, but throwing a nonsense tantrum and fabricating straw-men to rail against isn’t helping your argument.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Anecdotes? I gave you numbers. Hell, need a more drastic example? Toyota Yaris, 100kph to 0, 32m and it weights… 1090kg! That’s half the weight of a Veyron yet it takes a longer distance to slow it down! Hell, you love Kei trucks so much, they do a freaking stoppie if you apply the brakes too hard!

                  https://youtu.be/M2wUvkrmYFU

                  Safe as fuck, right?

                  How is a truck with a tall grill unsafe but a truck with a flat nose safe for pedestrians during an impact? It’s the same kind of impact, one where the passenger isn’t thrown on the hood!

          • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            A lot of the kei trucks and cars have a Suzuki F6A or K6A engine that was also used in some artic cat snowmobile. That kind of commonality makes it easy enough to find parts. Worst case scenario it is a 2 weeks wait time to get the part delivered from Japan. You know what took me more than 2 weeks to get some parts? A 2015 VW golf.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              That covers your Suzuki Alto Works’ engine but how much trouble was it to figure out where to get brakes for it?

              😬

              • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Easy enough that I could get the car to pass the provincial inspection roughly a month after I got it. How long did it took you to get that Audi S2 road legal?

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Call the dealer, order part VS spend hours figuring out what to order from where and hope that it’s actually legit…

                  Never had an S2 but it wasn’t for a lack of parts that I didn’t get my S4 road legal

                  🖕

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This article is even less informative than the same conversation last week.

    To sum up, even a small car can have a dangerous design prohibited in the USA.

    Plus, and this is sort of a big one not mentioned in this article, these folks were exploiting a loophole for antique vehicles to get around regulations.

    We’ve had enough time now jalopnik.com should have discovered new information such as why they don’t meet federal safety standards.