• TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unlikely. There’s kind of only two hard-and-fast rules for nuclear war:

    • Never strike first.
    • Never strike a non-nuclear enemy.
    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Russia were to strike Ukraine with a nuclear bomb, first and foremost that puts every nation on a knife’s edge globally… someone else with an itchy trigger finger could launch against Russia in the confusing hours afterwards. Next up, the PRC and India would likely abandoned Russia as waves of condemnation would flood the global media. Finally, the whole goal of the war is to take Ukraine, not to make it uninhabitable… why nuke what you want to own?

      • SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nukes don’t have to leave behind radiation and make an area uninhabitable anymore. Those were the “Dirty” fission bombs. Fusion bombs are considered more clean.

        • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, more clean but not completely… this is not to mention the amount of damage caused by the bomb. Striking Kiev or another city would effectively decimate Ukraine’s infrastructure and economy for decades. If the goal of the war is to subjugate, you don’t want to be in the hook for all those repairs. A nuke on any of Ukraine’s cities would make that dam break last year look like nothing.