• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How is that a tough choice?

    First, Biden isn’t talking about banning all guns, he wants to regulate assault rifles and institute mandated background checks to stop children from being shot in their own neighborhoods every day.

    Then, his administration includes the first black vice president, 25 appointed black judges, wrote that executive order about protecting minority voting rights since they’re targeted so often.

    On the other side, dumps will say anything to get you to vote for him, and goes back on his promises anytime it’s personally inconvenient, so you can’t trust anything he says on guns or racial Justice.

    Trump has apparently has given zero thought to racial Justice, which shouldn’t be surprising to anyone.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      A hardcore second amendment voter will usually resist any and all measures that restrict firearm possession, often on the basis of slippery slope arguments. Since the basis is rooted in a classic logical fallacy, they can be very difficult to persuade.

      You’re right though, Biden has been fairly moderate on gun control. So was Obama though, and you remember how they reacted to him?

      • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Obama signed legislation which expanded gun rights and allowed concealed carry in national parks.

        Republicans spent his next 2 terms saying Obama will ban access to guns…

        None of this is based in reality.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Why the fuck would a hardcore second amendment voter ever consider supporting Donald “take the guns first” Trump, though‽

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree about gun zealotry, but if those are your two issues:

        1. Biden has said he does not want to restrict most guns, but he does want to protect children.

        Trump instituted gun control measures over his administration, and as with everything else has said he supports gun control and says he doesn’t support gun control depending on which crowd he’s talking to.

        I guess you can consider that a wash.

        1. But racial Justice? Clearly Biden all the way.

        On those two points, biden’s clearly ahead.

        If that guy is still undecided, then he cares significantly more about guns than he cares about racial justice or national leadership.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, I am not that guy for the record. But if you read the article it said he automatically rejects any candidate that advocates for gun control. So, that means Biden is flat out for him, along with pretty much the whole dem party.

          The amusing part to me personally was that such a person would normally just vote gop. But that specific guy cannot, for fairly obvious reasons.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Biden advocates for gun control and restricted gun access.

            Dumps advocates for gun control and restricted gun access.

            I think people just assume dumps is pro second amendment since he switched to the Republicans.

            Ah well.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Trump did more than that; he advocated for simply seizing guns without due process. He’s worse than Biden from a second amendment perspective, not equal!