What would I care. For me confirmation of news happens with common sense story by story. A story can go though several modes of media before it gets to you. In fact, the whiners seem to dislike the owner of Twitter. I could give two shits because I know that a story can start in Twitter and end up on this very sub.
Let’s test a mastodon link instead!
https://mastodon.social/@KraftTea/112922529525115222
Or or, and hear me out (actual campaign presence): https://truthsocial.com/@KamalaHQ/posts/112917651295728303
Now why would truth social be OK with you guys and Twitter is not?
Kamala is meeting people where they’re at. Even if it’s a cesspool swamp worse than Twitter.
WTF are you talking about.
The truth social link points to a post by the Harris waltz campaign.
The argument isn’t the presenter but the medium in which it is presented.
Hell, at least Truth Social is clearly right wing; X is still pretending to be Twitter, wearing the blue bird like a skin suit.
“Put the lotion in the basket Elon…”
What would I care. For me confirmation of news happens with common sense story by story. A story can go though several modes of media before it gets to you. In fact, the whiners seem to dislike the owner of Twitter. I could give two shits because I know that a story can start in Twitter and end up on this very sub.
Meh, post any. Let them whine!
Let’s watch
Eu Clare. https://x.com/jake__traylor/status/1821238502589071585?s=19
Motown https://x.com/da_wessel/status/1821313969505645023?s=19
deleted by creator
First time I’ve ever clicked a truth social link
I found that I can either accept their cookies, or get more information about why I can only accept them, which concluded my brief visit.
Same here. I haven’t felt filthy visiting a website in a long time
Me too! (I actually found it on mastodon)
I wish I knew how to use that site but it’s kinda complicated to me