• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Rush, who saw himself as an innovator like “Steve Jobs or Elon Musk,” the complaint says, once told Pogue, “At some point, safety just is pure waste.” Rush thought he had found a lighter way to build subs.”

    This really summarizes the mindset of most second+ generation rich people. Because this guy lived with a lot of inherited money and power all his life, he assumed that everything that comes out of his brain must be the ultimate truth. So much so that without even a single reservation he happily took his son with him to that journey knowing full well that the submarine was probably violating several critical safety requirements that he deemed unnecessary. We are basically being ruled by such people folks.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        you should really consider frequency among non billionaires and among second+ generation billionaires. not that I have data on it but I really do think growing up in such an environment does inflate your sense of self idea worth and therefore such a person is more likely to act in this way (but not claiming at all that they are the only ones)

  • Emmie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This controller kept me in rocket league gold for months. I put it on eBay and some shmuck said they need it in a submarine but are on a budget so max can do is three fiddy. I just wanted to get rid of the thing

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Since the story came out people fixated on “lol he used a shitty gaming controller” but really that is one of the least sketchy design choices in the entire rig. Why reinvent the wheel and make a custom set of controls that are realistically another huge expense and potential failure point, when off the shelf solutions exist for that component?

    The corners that were cut are the ones involving the viewport/nose adhesion to the ships frame, and the structural integrity of the carbon fiber hull itself. They had test data suggesting it was a bad idea to engage in repeated dives with their design, and an even worse idea to operate at the depths they chose. They decided to ignore that.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      That doesn’t explain why they used the wireless version of that Logitech instead of wired to control the thing they were literally inside.

      • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        To be fair, they’re under water and sharks have been known to chew through electrical cables

        • Tricky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I suspect the wired cabling would be to control components inside the sub, not outside. And I say that only because it’s unlikely that wireless signals would penetrate the sub walls.

          • gedhrel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Have you seen pictures of the sub? What makes you think the wiring was all hidden?

            • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It looked worse than cheapest capsule hotel ever built…

              I’m mildly claustrophobic and I would have troubles going in that tube even on mainland.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The same reason you use the wireless version of any controller.

        If you run into issues you can simply plug in any wireless controller.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      From what I can tell the lawsuit (which is against Ocean Gate, not Logitech) is really just calling out the controller as another example of willfully negligent behaviour.

      You’re certainly correct that the actual cause of the failure was the carbon fibre hull. Just a terrible idea on so many levels. Carbon fibre, by its nature, is good under tension, not compression. It was never going to function well as a pressure vessel underwater.

      There were a litany of terrible decisions made by Ocean Gate, such as not tethering the sub, because it was cheaper to launch it from a towed raft, but none of those bad decisions ultimately mattered once that pressure vessel failed. Those people were dead so fast that, to quote Scott Manley, “You go from being biology to being physics.”

      • buttfarts@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can always bring a second controller for redundancy. I would bet money the game controller had zero impact on the failure and I hate all the shade being thrown on this innocent controller.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          In the context of the lawsuit it’s definitely a valid thing to bring up, mostly because it helps you tell the story to the jury. But yeah, in practice it probably didn’t represent much of a hazard on its own (though it almost certainly wasn’t fire rated)

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That game controller has terrible range, zero compatibility with any other device, and randomly adds inputs when the controller is more than 2 feet away from the receiver. It is reasonable to consider if uncontrolled movement contributed to the implosion, or a loss of control at a critical moment preventing return to the surface.

      • buttfarts@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The game controller is not managing life critical functions, that’s called a computer. The game controller plugs into the computer. The great thing about that is that you can bring a second (or even a third) game controller for redundancy.

        It’s just that the engineering choices that caused the failure are difficult to understand or communicate in sentence so the game controller is something any idiot can harp on about and sound smart.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          he game controller is not managing life critical functions

          oh, it doesn’t control ascent and descent, angle of attack, etc? it’s not used to turn or operate the craft, that’s all ‘done by computer’?

          pfft.

          bluetooth and other wireless interface protocols aren’t meant for life critical applications. give me a hardwired input - even a game controller - any day when it comes to life or death shit.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Using commercial off the shelf technology without proper testing and certification is absolutely cutting corners. See: Kaprun disaster.

      What kind of fire rating did those COTS parts throughout the interior of the vessel have? What kind of redundancy existed? Would you use a Logitech controller for a spacecraft? The requirements of deep sea submersibles and spacecraft are quite similar. Would any of the submersible certification agencies approved this? I think not.

      I see the Logitech controller, the carbon fiber hull, and so many other decisions he made as symptoms of the same corner cutting, “move fast and break things” mentality he had.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wasnt the carbon fiber body rated for like, 1/3rd the depth that they dove to?

      It was very NASA O-Ring vibes. “We did it once, so we can do it every time” at least until they cant anymore, and that cant is usually accompanied by regret and poor innocent people being salsafied.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Having tried to use those, my main issue was the 710 is an unreliable 2.4ghz wireless, when bluetooth controllers all worked much better for me. I couldn’t get the 710 to have reliable button presses from more than like 4 feet from my pc, so I ended up just using the 310 wired. Maybe there isn’t enough interference on the sub for that to be an issue.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s going to be no external interference when you’re under water. Sea water makes an excellent em shield

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          True, but that’s hardly an endorsement for their safety. Wireless should never be used for critical life support equipment. It is mind bogglingly stupid they did this.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This particular model of controller is notoriously terrible, unreliable, and prone to contact failure. Anyone reading the amazon reviews would know it wasn’t even a good choice as a player2 little brother controller.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dude, the F710 is legitimately a terrible controller with a tiny range and a manufacture flawed nano receiver. I mean it’s not the steepest corner they cut but you can get a rock solid drone remote with ridiculous range for barely twice the price of an f710.

      It was a stupid choice that they actively ignored the results. Like i said, ANYONE who uses this controller for more than an hour will directly experience how terrible it is.

  • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve got two F710s and they’re reliable enough. I wouldn’t trust them in pro gaming though.

    If I got in the sub and saw one of these used to steer it, I’d be very concerned. I know they’re not really blaming Logitech; just taking one of these out of the plastic packaging and saying ‘OK, now we’ve got steering and propulsion!’ is not really a safety culture to get behind.

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    They couldn’t have splurged for an Xbox controller at least?

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The vast majority of the cause of the 3 mile island nuclear meltdown was a moisture soaked compressor pump completely unrelated to any of the safety or emergency systems. With complicated failures, the actual fault is not always easy to detect.

      It’s reasonable to think that the controller might have contributed to unexpected descent past safety levels, or prevented them from recovering when warnings appeared.

          • Jasonw911@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You are technically correct, and that is the best kind of correct. I spoke from frustration, having grown up there. What i should have said was that there was no danger to the public, it was fully contained behind multiple redundant safety containments. Its frustrating because i feel like that incident stalled nuclear energy in this country since then.

            • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I wouldn’t say no danger, but the danger was averted. It did even release radioactive material, but not enough to be dangerous.

              It could have gone much worse, but it didn’t.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh yeah, the controller is clearly the one a fault here…

    I mean, they clearly made this for an submersible, one made of carbon fibre specifically.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just taking a guess here but the controller was probably brought up as evidence for how much they were cutting corners and disregarding safety and good sense, not as the cause of the failure

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That controller is known for just forgetting it’s tethered to anything or suddenly veering off for no reason. I know because I have had one for years.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    willfully get in a sub built by an idiot known to have said very weird things about safety

    die

    your „estate” sues the sub company for $50 million

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Honestly. I can’t afford deep sea submarine dive. I can afford a train ticket though. Do I question every train company, every train driver and coductor whether their train is real, fully functional train? No, I simply assume it is, because how else would it be even possible for them to operate it in this day and age?

          And I believe these rich people did the exact same thing, jist with a different machine…

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sure, but you’re talking about routine things, not a maiden voyage of some brand new service. Deep sea voyages just aren’t a thing available for the average person, so I’d hold off and not be the first to try it out until it’s proven. I guess there’s some FOMO there, but there are always kinks to work out with any new service.

            • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, I wouldn’t get in such a death trap ever, but who am I? Imagining I have infinite money and the world is a sandbox for me, would this feel like “just another thing to keep me interested” like space jumps or formula rental or similar adrenaline gigs? Most likely yes. Everyone in my multi-billionaire social bubble would probably do similar things, so… Why not deep dive? I have paid lot of money, what could go wrong.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    At this point filing a multi-million dollar lawsuit against OceanGate will be like trying to extract blood from a stone.

    What tangible assets do OceanGate really have left to pay Nargeolet’s estate? Their CEO (the maverick aerospace engineer who thought he was ‘revolutionizing’ the submarine industry by cutting corners) is dead, their only active submersible imploded, their reputation has been tainted by the fact that they’ve been selling billionaires what is effectively a carbon fiber coffin waiting to implode, and any angel investors have probably pulled out harder than a porn star on the verge of climax.

    Even then, they may not even have a case. IANAL but in an age where every single tech and gaming company has been pushing through class action waivers and forced arbitration clauses in their Terms of Service, I get the feeling that any attempts at suing OceanGate will be thrown out of court by the waivers each passenger had to sign.

    There is a sense of irony in people celebrating this disaster on social media because it means “five less billionaires in the world.” No, this is potentially a massive L for us commoners, because it shows just how much corporate greed can destroy lives. If the rich can be screwed this badly by an unregulated corporation, imagine what corporate giants can do to people who can’t afford lawyers.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is it because everything else on the sub was ordered from aliexpress and pieced together? This was the only part from a legitimate manufacturer?

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I wouldn’t use a wireless controller playing subnautica. This is on the company for using sub par tech. Next time use first party wired!

  • ndupont@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I own 3 of those. They are not for PS or XBox but for mostly for PC gaming. They are not Bluetooth, they come with their dedicated USB nano receiver. I don’t even trust them to win a championship in “F1 race stars”, the arcade F1 game. The wireless is not reliable enough. They eat AA batteries like candy.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Absolutely agreed and I’ve had to replace the shoulder bumpers on mine twice now. ALSO the trigger traverse is RIDICULOUSLY LONG! Like I can fire an actual semi pistol faster and those have a five lb draw.

      But man do they feel nice in the hand. No controller since the ps2 has felt like this to me.

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everyone’s joking here but I’ve owned and used an F710 since 2009 and they are ABSOLUTE CRAP.

    I’m not even joking but their range is like 3 feet in the BEST conditions and their USB controller is proprietary and doesn’t even work with OTHER F710s.

    Anyone who’s used one for more than a few hours knows this.

    Why do I still use mine? Well the hand feel is amazing and the weight is perfect, but everything else is terrible and shouldn’t even be used for gaming.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just get the F310, like me, and you can enjoy that three foot range without batteries.

      Also, WHY DID THE SUB USE THE WIRELESS VERSION WHEN THE WIRED IS CHEAPER AND WIRED?

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think mainly the wireless choice was for aesthetics, they were building experiences for billionaires and those assholes put way to much score in appearance.

        • BigPotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Then at least use something fancy like a flight stick! The F710 makes… anything newer than the Gravis Gamepad look like luxury!