• eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re probably old, senile and out of touch millionaires who are insulated from any consequences.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The irony of calling “double hater” people who as a general rule don’t like people who spread hate or actively support those who practice hate, is also delicious and kind of says everything one needs to know about the Doublethink style of discourse of the people making up such labels.

      Being truly anti-hate as a principle logically makes one be both against Trump and Biden, one for spreading hate and the other for actively supporting people practicing their hate aginst men, women and children with extreme violence.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m among them. Thought, Harris still wouldn’t have been mu first choice but she’s a hell of a lot better than Biden.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed. I’d rather see Tim Walz for prez.
      So maybe it speeks well for her, that she picked him for VP.

  • eskimofry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Rules for not losing election*:

    1. Don’t insult the intelligence of your voters by calling them double haters.
    2. Don’t insult the intelligence of your voters by pretending that they won’t remember that you supported a genocidal maniac. No, the opposition being worse doesn’t excuse your depravity.
    3. Don’t insult the intelligence of your voters by beating them with the stick of facism. They already understand what’s on the line. Debating online is different from voting.

    *Does not apply to conservatives who worship Trump

    • newnton@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I very much don’t think your average person understands the threat of fascism or what’s on the line, I feel like that belief comes from being in a left leaning echo chamber.

      Obviously anecdotal but the vast majority of people I know are not great about consuming news, are not politically active, and don’t believe this election will have the deep consequences that I do.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your first paragraph doesn’t really make sense as those on the left tend to be the most keenly aware of the dangers of fascism, since

        a) First they came for LGBTQ+ people (which was left out of the poem since it was written by a conservative priest who was fine with persecution of THEM) and then they came for us

        b) it’s always us that end up having to fight fascists alone since the liberals try to negotiate with them (or stay out of it at first and then join them like they did in Italy with Mussolini) and the others on the far right try to become their allies

        Unless you consider Neoliberals left leaning. In which case you’re MORE wrong, but your logic is more consistent.