• Scratch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    With Joe stepping down and a surge of support for Kamala, is there a point where the Supreme Court has to accept they’re not winning this time and switch to clean house of people who overplayed their hand?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      What? No, definitely not. They’re appointed for life and don’t have to give a shit about anything Kamala could possibly do.

      (Well, short of using the immunity they gave Trump to Seal Team Six them, I guess, but no Democrat is likely to do that and they know it.)

      • doughless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If Democrats are ever lucky enough to get 2/3rds of the Senate (and 51% of the House), at that point the Supreme Court might start to think twice about their decisions.

        Edit: unfortunately unlikely, though

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Grossly unlikely. We’re likely to see the country continue to consolidate most of the population into a few states. We could be seeing a situation in the next few cycles where it’s outright impossible for Democrats to win the senate while blowing out the House and Presidential vote.