Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agoCan I have a rule?files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1171arrow-down1imageCan I have a rule?files.catbox.moeRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresircac@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·18 days agoThere is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
minus-squareQuentinQuiver@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoOnly science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
minus-squareQuentinQuiver@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoThe “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true. Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.
There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.