• blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even if it doesnt have much impact on activitypub-fedi, I think this is good news for the fediverse in general. X is loosing more and more relevancy and microblogging is more and more happening on federating services.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m having trouble figuring out how bluesky is part of the fediverse at all.

      From my understanding it doesn’t federate with anything.

      It’s like saying a hamburger is really just a cheeseburger…you just need to add cheese.

        • asudox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Oh great. That bridge even federates with the bitcoin bros’ network (nostr)

            • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Maybe they mean Nostr? If so, describing it as “the bitcoin bros’ network” is a bit misleading, since the “crypto” portion of Nostr is short for “cryptography”, not “cryptocurrency”.

              • r00ty@kbin.life
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                2 months ago

                Ah, so the kind of crypto bro, that instead of a fistbump, does a diffie-hellman key exchange instead?

              • asudox@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Oh yeah, no. I literally mean the majority of the community there. All I see there is blockchain and bitcoin shit.

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I think Nostr might unironically be my favourite platform, simply because it keeps those toxic morons away from the fediverse.

          • I really like the Nostr protocol, though. It’s too bad the network is so inundated by cryptocurrency topics.

            It’s simple, it has a nice extension process (standing on the shoulders of giants), and it’s super easy and lightweight to self-host. It reminds me a lot of the early days of http, when it was more common (as a developer) to telnet to port 80 and just type in a couple of lines of header and get a response.

            Sadly, Nostr’s association with cryptocurrency, and the fact that 90% of the traffic on it is cryptocurrency created posts, has been a severe handicap.

      • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        In theory, bluesky can federate with other apps but it is currently the only one using their protocol, bluesky servers can federate with each other and when a new project using atprotocol appears it will probably be able to federate with that

      • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        But control of the protocol - the definition and development - is still controlled by the for-profit company, right? It hasn’t been handed over to a nonprofit governance committee, has it?

        Federation or not, if Bluesky dominates the protocol, they can decide to stop federating and essentially kill the independent servers. Much like what Signal did. Sure, you can run your own Signal server, but without access to the dominant player’s market, and using a protocol that’s controlled monopolistically, it’s practically useless to do so - which is why almost nobody does it anymore.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Much like what Signal did. Sure, you can run your own Signal server

          Wait what? Are we talking about the chat app?

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can’t run your own server. Never have been able to…

              You can create your own federated chat app or whatever that uses the Signal protocol? You can also fork the Signal chat application? But all Signal messages run through Signal servers.

              • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Seems to be similar here, you can run PDS (personal instances), but they still rely on a central Bluesky server

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Right, the point is there was never a time you could use Signal on another server.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Mastodon.social just went over the 2 million user mark. The switch to fediverse and fediverse adjacent is going pretty quick.

    • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been on Mastodon for over a year and the content simply isn’t there. Several of the people that I follow on Twitter have tried moving or duplicating to Mastodon. They’ve had a fraction of the visibility and engagement from commenters that they would get on Twitter. Invariably after a few months they have essentially given up on it as a primary medium. For me the discoverability is essentially non-existent, which I don’t think is helped by the idea of it being based around instance-local communities, which have no meaning when you’re looking at something like Twitter.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        mastodon had their chance during the first exodus but they refused to listen to what twitter users wanted and shot down things like lists, quote tweets, and privacy controls.

        mastodon is very gatekeeper-y

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe they should stop caring about visibility and engagement and concentrate on participating in, building and y’know enjoying a community?

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can not have one without the other. Influencers look for audiences. If the community has no influencer, it means that the audience is irrelevant or inexistent.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Not a comeback. My point is that no one cares about this space at all. We had for the past two years everything in our favor to dismantle corporate-controlled social media, but the people that are here have ridiculously small ambitions and seem to keep the Fediverse completely irrelevant.

                  How else can I put it? Imagine that you live in corner of the woods of Bumfuck Alabama and you say, “I’m so glad we don’t have McDonalds around here”, like it was some reason to be proud. It’s not, it just means that you live in a place so desolate that not even McDonalds thinks it’s worth it to open a shop there.

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Guess it’s not for you then. I’m having a blast. A lot of my friends are now in it and the last year or so have been great.

        And more and more people seem to be moving.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My experience has been better. User engagement is much higher per follower and the discussions don’t devolve. They’re much more useful and/or interesting. KPIs don’t measure everything.

        • ericjmorey@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Many people are most interested in profit as their only KPI and mastodon puts up a lot of hurdles for those people.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe, just maybe, if your followers aren’t willing to give up something vile because it’s giving them a dopamine hit, they’re not adding as much value to your life as you think.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is absolutely nothing “vile” about quote tweets. When used properly, it is used to enrich a discussion. It’s not just because some idiot minority abuses a feature that it should be removed entirely. If well meaning people look at two different systems, and one of them is arbitrarily gutted of useful functionality, guess which one they will choose?

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, at the surface level of tweeting back and forth, there is nothing vile. But the very act of using the platform funds an agent of chaos that is doing very real harm, and to ignore that because it is inconvenient is at the most charitable interpretation a selfish and callous act. There are other means of discourse, and those with input that is valuable will follow you.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I am saying “quote tweets” as a reference to the functionality, not the usage of Twitter itself.

              Mastodon refuses to implement the functionality, but it is supported on others: Soapbox, Akkoma…

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        „The content“ is there. Its just the addiction inducing, never ending dopamine that doesnt flow as freely which is great.

        If you follow the topics that are most prevalent on the fedi (eg freedom, activism, technology, diversity) you will not run out unless you scroll for many hours a day, which is suggests you find yourself a hobby.

        Also, the self fulfilling prophecy of „the fediverse is too small, I go to big platform“ will keep the fediverse small.

        Be the change you want to see.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          freedom, activism, technology, diversity

          Boring, boring, boring, boring. This is all “meta-converaation”, like this exact thread.

          Where are the musicians, the woodworkers, the DIYers, the athletes, the architects, the photographers, the wannabe chefs, the contrarian educators who do not toe the line of Academia?

        • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I feel this and some of the other comments in this thread are missing the point. It’s not about me and my followers. It’s about the news sources and topics that I search for or follow. They simply haven’t moved to Mastodon and where notable individuals that I follow have tried, it simply hasn’t worked out due to lack of interest. I’m not interested in the fediverse as a topic in itself, I’m interested in the topics and events I want to follow. Something happens and I can find and read and watch clips about it on Twitter. Not so Mastodon.

          • ericjmorey@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bluesky is probably going to capture more of that than Mastodon. But threads is similarly struggling to develop it as well and they have very low barrier for new signups for anyone with a Facebook or Instagram account.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            You are missing the point.

            If lucifer was the only one having ice cream and you wanted ice cream, you would have to either go to lucifer or make your own (or ask someone to do it for you).

            This is what the fediverse is about. Regaining control of our media. Your point that it is in any way too lacking to join or invest time into is self defeating as you and many others are needed to get it to that point.

            So I‘m saying either accept that your work is needed to get any non billionaire owned/non corporate platform to work or stop pretending you care about your data.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              You’re both right.

              If there aren’t people building this alternative, in their free time, for free, then it won’t exist. Fair enough. Much credit to them.

              But it looks like @SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world is just an ordinary user with a busy life who wants to consume content in a way that better respects their privacy and autonomy. That is also a fair demand. Not everyone needs to be a producer.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Blue sky leads to the same trap Twitter was. A place that will be purchased by some asshole that shits on everyone for money.

    • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’ll be shocked to know that bluesky is open source then and PDS is well on its way to allowing you to host your own instance.

        • ericjmorey@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Anything that you’re not willing and able to keep financially sustained yet rely upon will likely be used against you by someone with more resources. This is why groups like Fosstodon, Beehaw, and Fedihosting Foundation stand out in these spaces. They are both transparent and financially sustainable. But most of that sustainability relies on unpaid volunteer labor.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good. Competition is good. If they suceed or fail just means we learn and build a better product.

  • Mwas alt (prob)@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    i dont like bluesky bcs its missing alot of features compared to mastodon and twitter also when you host bluesky the server you hosted you cant view bsky.social so thats why i use mastodon alongside

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It would be interesting to know more about the additional users. The banning of Shitter in Brazil is very much tied to internal politics and AFAIK it might be the Brazilian equivalent to MAGA that is currently mass-migrating to Bluesky.

    If so, this might be a bad thing for them, as they probably don’t want to get perceived as the Brazilian truth.social.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      it might be the Brazilian equivalent to MAGA that is currently mass-migrating to Bluesky.

      actually, the opposite. The MAGA types are doing whatever they can to continue sucking on Elon’s balls. It’s journos and normies who are moving to Bluesky.

    • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would assume that since this whole thing is more or less a result of left-ish policy, and the opponent in the scenario is the far-right platform formerly known as Twitter, lead by the aspiring far-right icon Musk, the right-wingers would more likely opt to complain, cry several rivers and eventually turn to alternatives catered specifically for them (not even sure which ones are still alive after former tweetyplace took the crown) instead.

      Haven’t done a vibe check on bluesky, but I assume it almost has to be more tolerant and potentially more progressive-ish than the old nazibirdhouse. If you lean towards the far right, why choose that, if alternatives exist?

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Bluesky is explicitly promoting their system as “choose your own censorship” kind of deal, which in the way it is framed could look very attractive to right-wingers looking for an alternative platform. While this is technically also true for the Fediverse, it isn’t promoted as such, and rather has a reputation for the opposite, as most fedi server admins are center-left leaning.

        Bluesky might be also more left-leaning right now as obviously there is little reason for right-wingers elsewhere to switch away from Shitter to another (mostly) centralised platform, but given the overall low user numbers this could switch very quickly.

        I guess we will have to see how this develops over time and get some answers from Brazilians that have a deeper understanding of the current social dynamics there.

        Due to the language divide it might end up as two distinct social spheres, like Fedi’s Japanese bubble, but that’s a best case scenario for Bluesky I guess.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even though I still don’t understand those platforms, I had a look at the site. It seems like 80+ percent of the content is from Brazil or at least in Portugese.

      If you enable and check nsfw content it is also 80+ percent dicks and furry content. One of the dick posts was a self declared “15y” which I promptly reported (a day later the posts & profile seem to be gone, presumably banned, which is good). You can mute hash tags of your choice, but then 90+ percent of the feed will be muted posts or those that did not get caught because they did not use hash tags. Muted users still show up in those feeds too, you have to properly block them to hide them but that is also incredibly tedious when it is basically all that there is.

      A lot of posts also seem to just be weird spam, using the same odd list of hash tags that I can’t make sense of (but maybe that’s just weird local online trends there). I tried looking for various topics but could only find fringe posts & accounts, worse than even here. But that again might just come down to the fact that the majority of users seem to be from Brazil, so the English content is simply lacking on all fronts. You can specify languages in your profile, but I did not notice to what purpose when it still shows you all the non English stuff.

      Aside from all that I once again couldn’t figure out what to do, just like on Twitter back then or on Mastodon. I suppose those platforms and their hype will remain a mystery to me. But I can’t help but wonder how people from Twitter who think about switching will react to this experience though…

    • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Brazilian MAGA = Most Bolsonaro supporters. Of course, there are some decent people who aren’t 100% fanatic, but most of them would be the equivalent to those hat-wearers.

  • figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I have mastodon, how and when can I follow Blue sky users? I read something about an adapter server or something, but I don’t know what that means in a practical sense.

  • XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there an easy to understand explanation to the differences of the AT Protocol and ActivityPub?

    • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      iirc, atprotocol was made to bring some features of mainstream social media to the fediverse that activitypub maintainer have said they won’t be adding. They explain other reasons in their faq

      • ericjmorey@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many of the functions provided by a Mastodon service is split into separate services in the AT Protocol. This means there are instances that just handle an end users data, instances that just handle indexing and streaming out the amalgamated end user data being streamed to the “relay”, there are instances that are just filtering the stream from the indexing relay. so basically the backend is modular with the AT Protocol rather than monolithic as is assumed by the ActivityPub protocol where separation is assumed to be only between the frontend and backend of the service.