Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agostoplocklemmy.caimagemessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down122
arrow-up140arrow-down1imagestoplocklemmy.caHellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square112fedilink
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days agoWell it certainly gave us alot to chew on.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days ago alot Do notional creatures count?
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 days agoOf course, they are very important!
minus-squareMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days ago“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic. No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 days ago No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly. So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
minus-squareAurenkin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 days agoI would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
Well it certainly gave us alot to chew on.
Do notional creatures count?
Of course, they are very important!
“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic.
No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
There are exceptions.
Pigs are delicious tho
Maybe for you
I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.