• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Why is it not answered?

    • since they are by definition far beyond our technology, it may not be up to us
    • since they are by definition sentient beings (op said “civilization”), then how are they any different. When we say “human” it’s just that it’s the only sentient being we’re familiar with. Anything applying to a “human” most likely applies to any sentient being. “Seizing the means of production” might be analogous to like Ethiopia seizing from the US. Good luck with that, see the first point
    • statistically those aliens are almost certainly microbes, which have no opinion or rights. It’s all on us whether we preserve them as a unique or beneficial (to us) form of life. They’re no different than a coral reef
    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      since they are by definition far beyond our technology,

      There’s always a scenario like “District 9”, which involves a spaceship full of uneducated workers in a ship whose technology they don’t understand.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Also the simple possibility that it’s us that explores our way out to them, rather than the other way around

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        That makes A great movie plot but it seems awfully far fetched , even in the reality where aliens visit us

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      since they are by definition far beyond our technology

      How so? Aliens aren’t going to suddenly come into existence and have super-human technology in that same instant.

    • AEsheron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Sapient, not sentient. Sci-fi has co-opted the word, but sentient basically means able to feel emotions. There are plenty of sentient species right here at home. Sapient is the word sci-fi usually wants, there are no known sapient species aside from humans. Though some may argue that a couple other animals may qualify, it’s a very fuzzy concept that is hard to identify with a being unable to communicate abstract concepts.

      • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        i would absolutely say there are other sapient species, we just don’t like to think of them as such. Obviously a lot of aquatic mammals come to mind, but I think there’s a very very good case to argue that cephalopods, elephants, some aquatic mammals, and some birds are sapient. Especially by sci-fi rules. I think there’s sufficient evidence to show that elephants, dolphins, and maybe corvids or cephalopods would pass the trial of Commander Data and be considered intelligent and sapient life.