Subtitle: Springfield’s immigrant community was targeted by far-right extremists months before Trump shared racist rumors

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    Fortunately, feelings aren’t protected in the US. Hate speech can only be used to show intent in the commission of an actual crime.

    Should’ve used the “fire in a theater” example with stochastic terrorism from a position of authority.

    Why is it I need make your argument for you? Think about that one for awhile.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Should’ve used the “fire in a theater” example with stochastic terrorism from a position of authority.

      How about the example of someone saying black immigrants are eating dogs in a debate carried by all networks and live on multiple streaming platforms?

    • killingspark@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think I can say that I am living in germany, currently a country not under the government of national fascists, that has a law against so called “Volksverhetzung” which has been introduced quite literally to prevent some speech of the nationalist fascists, to prevent them from spreading their hateful ideology. Maybe you wanna think about that for awhile.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        They already have thought about it - see the part where they’re glad our rights aren’t curtailed just because someone might say some words that hurt your feelings.

        Germany can take their nanny state bullshit and fuck right off.

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          That’s an opinion one can have, but it’s different from calling everyone that might want a more restrictive policy a nationalist fascist

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        16 days ago

        The prolitariat doesn’t need the protection of governance from ideas. That’s how we get Nazis. Study your history.

        • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Nah bruv, as an american, the people are too dumb to not need some sort of protection from hate speech and ideas. A fact checker needs to be a mandatory public service at this point. I feel the same way about the homeless bum who shouts at everyone downtown that their participation in consummerism is destroying everything. If they called for violence, it would be a step too far.

          • hakase@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            If the people are too dumb to be trusted with an unrestricted marketplace of ideas, the they’re too dumb to be allowed to vote for their own government.

            If you believe in democracy, you have to also believe that the majority of people can be trusted with the information necessary to make informed political choices.

            If the people can’t be trusted to act in their best interests in an informed manner, then we might as well just adopt Plato’s philosopher-kings system instead, and make all of the peoples’ decisions for them.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              This is why the GOP has been working hard for decades to destroy public education in the US. They want to make sure that only the rich are educated because the uneducated can be easily tricked into voting against their own interests. Unfortunately it’s working.

              It’s mandatory in a functioning democracy for the public to be educated and well informed or it doesn’t work. Unfortunately it’s highly debatable whether the US still qualifies as educated, and the likes of Fox News and Sinclair are hard at work destroying the informed part.

              All that said the ease with which misinformation spreads these days does need some kind of counter, otherwise we open ourselves up to Soviet style disinformation campaigns where the goal isn’t so much to drive a particular narrative as it is to sow confusion and make people distrust all information. They drown the signal in noise, so everyone just makes decisions based on their gut instead of facts. Social media has given a false equivalence where any random person on Facebook is treated as just as reliable a source of news and information as actual reporters are. This is incredibly dangerous.

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            And, that’s exactly how we got so dumb.

            Check out The Manufacturing of Consent. Or, if lighter reading is your thing, 1984.

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          This isn’t about ideas it is about calling for violence towards people. This isn’t how you get Nazis this is the “you already have Nazis and need to do something about it”

          Also, funnily enough, the proletariat or what’s left of it, are the ones currently flocking to the right-wing extremist party here in Germany.