superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square210fedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up142arrow-down1·2 months agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up37arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·2 months agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)