• RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    They could all say they are going to disband if Israel doesn’t stop. Why even have the UN if they can’t do anything

    Or better yet expel isreal

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      First of all, that’s also not in his power.

      Secondly, how would disbanding the part of the UN that investigates human rights abuses help Palestinians?

      Edit: Wait, you think the entire UN should be disbanded over this?

      The UN is the only reason we haven’t had a nuclear war yet. Otherwise, countries wouldn’t have a neutral world forum.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s not what the UN is for… it’s not a military force… it’s a round table for nations to work their differences out via words and not nuking each other.

          • Lad@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            People like to criticise the UN but the alternative to having the UN is having no UN. We’d be fucked

            • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              We need something more than the UN that has real power to stop Israel’s terror and genocide. The UN can fuck off and prevent it’s theoretical events elsewhere.

              • kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                The US doesn’t even recognize the authority of the internation war crime tribunal, you really think they (or any other superpower) would accept binding arbitration in matters of international relations?