299792458ms@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-212 days agoSnap out of itlemmy.zipimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1756arrow-down120file-text
arrow-up1736arrow-down1imageSnap out of itlemmy.zip299792458ms@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-212 days agomessage-square133fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTrail@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up77arrow-down4·12 days agoThere is no software that is not in AUR. I use arch, BTW.
minus-squareTrail@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·12 days agoBut yeah, sometimes I just compile from source, if needed.
minus-squareSorryQuick@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 days agoThat’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed.
minus-squareTrail@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoIndeed, but don’t underestimate my laziness.
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·12 days agoMy software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy.
minus-squarefolkrav@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·12 days agoI guess we should have added the word “notable” I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·12 days agoOuch. xD It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code.
minus-squareoldfart@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 days agoThere’s so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys.
minus-squareulterno@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down7·edit-212 days agoGatekeeping the word “software” here? Here’s something not in the AUR. Tested on arch
minus-squarecm0002@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·12 days agoClearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35 Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it’s in the AUR. No exceptions. Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR.
minus-squareulterno@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-212 days agoI don’t intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It’s not worth it. Maybe I’ll make an AppImage at most. I don’t know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there.
minus-squarecm0002@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·12 days agoSorry, I’ve already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I’ll have to report this incident to…the council.
minus-squarelinuxgator@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 days agoSomeone will put the AppImage in AUR
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·12 days agoThis is such a weird gatekeeper take
minus-squarecm0002@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·12 days agoIts a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 days agoi use arch based btw (I love my Manjaro and it’s AUR support) :>
minus-squareInverseParallax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agohttps://youtu.be/V1mOWypIFRM
There is no software that is not in AUR. I use arch, BTW.
But yeah, sometimes I just compile from source, if needed.
That’s exactly what the vast majority of AUR packages do already? You can also apply modifications to the compilation process if needed.
Indeed, but don’t underestimate my laziness.
My software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy.
I guess we should have added the word “notable”
I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;)
I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?
Ouch. xD
It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code.
There’s so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys.
Gatekeeping the word “software” here?
Here’s something not in the AUR. Tested on arch
Clearly we need an Arch version of rule 34 and rule 35
Rule 34a: If linux software exists, it’s in the AUR. No exceptions.
Rule 35a: If linux software is not in the AUR, it will be made available in the AUR.
I don’t intend on pushing that one to the AUR. It’s not worth it.
Maybe I’ll make an AppImage at most.
I don’t know any formal requirements for it being on AUR, but I just feel like this one does not fit there.
Sorry, I’ve already posted the new internet rules and they took immediate effect, I’ll have to report this incident to…the council.
Someone will put the AppImage in AUR
This is such a weird gatekeeper take
Its a joke lol, why are you so serious all the time
i use arch based btw (I love my Manjaro and it’s AUR support) :>
https://youtu.be/V1mOWypIFRM