• Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except it would take 3 literal months to download it (stupid home internet with a 1.25TB data cap)

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          And if you go to the store and buy it in person, it’ll be a empty cd case with a serial key to download.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            or with a CD that installs a downloader, that is actually a background service always starting with the OS, and a few other bloatware to not waste CD space

            except that almost nobody has a CD drive anymore. so it must be a pendrive instead that was forced to read-only access

        • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Goodness, do you live in Australia or something? Are there any better options, or can you not afford them? My spoiled and priveleged self has trouble comprehending a data cap on my internet plan.

    • adavis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They already exist. $dayjob bought some 64GB ssds. They were about $7500USD per drive.

      • holycrap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        For 64gb? Did you mean tb or is there something unique about these drives?

          • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So, not that much more expensive, i bet west european countries get near or equal that price, it’s electronics in the US that are cheaper than others (including rich countries). and it’s more that we are poor.

            • zzx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s decently more expensive! $300-700 difference is pretty significant imo. Like I couldn’t swing that I don’t think, pushes it too expensive

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It could also be a difference in how sales tax or whatever is presented. I know in the EU, VAT is included in online pricing, whereas sales tax in the US is not. I don’t know how Brazil runs things, but that could explain a chunk of the difference. The US also likely has higher volume for these kinds of things, so prices will likely be lower in the US than Brazil.

                But yeah, it looks to be about 40-50% more expensive, which is substantial. If you’re looking to spend $600-700 on storage, there’s a good chance you can afford another $300-400, you just don’t want to spend that much.

                • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Brazilian system is the most simple: It is already the final price (not counting shipping, which might be many options), with EVERY tax included. Period. What i see is what i pay. Even Aliexpress shows numbers with all taxes included in the final total price now.

                  The Yankee system is honestly both insane and fraudulent, nothing is ever the price that the webpages or stickers show, i always have to guess it’s somewhere between 10% and 20% more. The european system is also more honest, unless they also have other taxes besides VAT that they don’t show.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    More density means less longevity, less write cycles before the blocks wear out, also decreases the time before Nand leakage can end up corrupting the data. Doesn’t seem like a good thing to me.

    Oh yeah, also more storage space causes complacency with developers who will terribly optimize their games because they don’t have to worry about games not fitting on people’s disks. Think 100GB games is bad it’ll get much worse when they got more free space at their disposal, and worse, the perception that their customers have tons of free space as well.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t disagree with you, but on the other hand, this will be a huge boon for people who do things like sail the high seas and wish to keep what they acquire long term. You’re not constantly rewriting in those cases. You’re just slowly (or perhaps not so slowly) filling up the drive. Eventually, it’s essentially read only.

      Considering how much I spent on 6 TB of regular hard drive storage for this reason a few years ago, I’d be all for affordable 8 TB SSDs.

      • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I recently bought a 5TB hard drive. It’s funny how that sounds like a lot of space until you fill it up and find yourself eyeing another.

        • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are plenty of games that you can’t buy on Gog or Steam even today (like any emulation ISO from console games), and sharing is caring for others that can not afford it.

    • Raxiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thinking about it, it would be nice if when formatting a partition on mlc based drives, you could specify the number of bits per cell used. So an 8tb QLC drive could be formatted as a 2tb SLC for those who want the resilience, without having to commit to it permanently.

      I’m sure there are technical reasons that would be difficult, but everything started out difficult until we figured it out.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      For the first part, as long as it isn’t too bad and it gets detected, and has methods for mitigating damage from losses, that’s fine. If you get a lot more capacity but lose some over time, you still have more capacity.

      For the latter, yeah it does but do they even care now? Personally, I don’t play any games that large really anyway, so it doesn’t effect me. Let them lose you as a customer too if that’s an issue and they surpass how much you’ll put up with.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The first part also applies to cold storage, like if you leave it off for a while and data will degrade without power as electrons leak out. Something that might be a concern for data archival on these drives.

        I don’t think they do care now, I’m not super worried about it but I might be if I wanted to get a PC port of a game that isn’t on PC now, where the old one is well optimized but the new one isn’t. Was the story when I got Okami HD on PC, it’s insane how they went from a game which came on an 8GB disc for PS3 and it’s 34GB on PC, I know they included 4K in the PC one but the fact it’s so much insanely larger makes me think a lot of it was wasted space by not compressing what could be compressed.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Technically the Pro Max already starts at 256 GB (starting with the 15 series iirc). But they simply removed the 128 GB option from the price stack.

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What do you need 256gb for? You don’t seriously store photos and videos on your phone… as the only place?

      • ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        My 100GB music library leaves less space than I’d like on a 128GB phone.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You really listen to that much music that often? I assume that’s compressed as well, because I don’t think there’s a point to high-bitrate media when you’re going to play it through phone speakers or Bluetooth.

          Personally I just use plain old FM radio in my car, a couple dozen songs on my workout playlist for the gym, and YouTube streams for work.

          • JamesFire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Personally I just use plain old FM radio in my car

            Great if you only want to listen to music half the time.

      • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I don’t get this. I still haven’t used more than ~115GB in years that I’ve been on iPhone. All my photos are in RAW (since supported) and I’ve got a huge lossless (or better) music library.

        Granted I don’t have 100% of everything on my phone all the time, but even my iCloud storage is pretty low.

        • ravhall@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I guess since I have Apple Music I don’t have very much on my phone at any one time.

          Most of my heavy usage are my Virtual Machines. But really, those don’t all have to be on at once. Am I really using windows that often?

          • return2ozma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I use YouTube Music and the only time I download music for offline is if I’m going to fly somewhere.

        • ravhall@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Fuck yeah! I NAS swap with a friend. I have my house NAS which syncs to my other one at his place and he does the same. (4 total)

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A 3.5" cartridge slot with a hard drive reader in it sounds kinda awesome, not gonna lie.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Excellent, I needed more space for cookies, malware and games that suddenly require 500GB of free space. I’ll have that thing full in no time.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Not sure which ones are AAA slop. I play online every Monday with a friend in the UK. Here are some of the games we’ve played:

        Grim Dawn, Diablo 4, Borderlands, Borderlands 2, Borderlands 3, Borderlands the presequel, Tiny Tina’s Wonderland, and currently we’re playing Aliens Elite something.

        But I have played other games with a different group of friends online.

        Man, the formatting sucks. There was a carriage return after every game. Why is it there for the paragraphs and gone for the lists?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Most of those are in the 30-60GB range IIRC. So if you keep 5 installed, you’re looking at 200GB or so.

          What OP is referring to is things like COD that are 300GB or so.

          Why is it there for the paragraphs and gone for the lists?

          You need a blank line between paragraphs, so:

          First paragraph.
          
          Second paragraph.
          

          If you want a list, add a hyphen or asterisk, like so, and you won’t need the blank line:

          - item one
          - item two
          

          Renders as:

          • item one
          • item two
  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m all for it, and it’s just the usual “moores law” trend, I just wonder if we won’t hit a wall where (most!) users just won’t need it?

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      most users already dont use what theyve got. its more about reducing physical size for the masses… these new techs will allow for even smaller storage for thinner, more efficient devices.

      i think only some power users (im a data horader) and commercial interests care about bulk storage

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m slightly surprised that loss of faith in corporations being good stewards of our cultural content - wantonly deleting cherished shows, namely - has not driven a larger move towards personal ownership of media. In a world where anything that fails to be profitable faces destruction, owning your stuff has never been a better idea.

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          People, in general, don’t care. I don’t necessarily mean that in a bad way, more that they just don’t notice until she show they searched for isn’t available and then they shrug it off and move on to another one they can watch. Most people I know don’t want to keep large catalogs around if things they like because they only watch a single movie a few times in their lives. They watch it and then they’re good for years or more. There’s so much content out there that there’s no way they’re going to rewatch things and there’s no way they’re going to miss it because they’re having enough trouble keeping up with all the new stuff. On top of that, the convenience of just turning on the tube and hitting play vs trying to find the disc, and store and organize it is huge. And ripping it and then keeping a large amount of storage locally, online and healthy for the purpose is out of their technical wheel house. (And budget at times)

          Honestly, I’m a big proponent for buying physical media… but I’ve greatly reduced what I rip/buy/keep, just knowing there’s only so much time left on my personal hourglass and I’ve got better things to do than worrying about all that up keep. When I kick the bucket, no one is going to care about it all. Maybe they’ll keep a few interesting ones but they’ll likely just sit on someone else’s shelf. In the mean time, how many times am I really going to watch some of these things?

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      nar. HDDs don’t require power to maintain their state. So that’s an advantage they’ll always have over SSDs, which means there will be use-cases where HDDs are the better choice.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        SSDs can reliably hold charge states for years, and there are storage media that are more reliable than HDD.

        HDD’s would still find a niche, probably, as a balanced option, but said niche will likely get smaller and smaller over many years.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          HDDs will probably always be useful for media storage, where quick access time isn’t required and it isn’t being used constantly. They should die for PCs though.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Exactly. I haven’t used a HDD in my PC for years, yet I bought HDDs for my homelab NAS. Unless SSDs get a lot cheaper, I’ll keep buying HDDs for on-prem bulk storage.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not yet, unless the higher capacity comes at a much lower price. HDDs are fine for the price currently