• kn33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      For that particular booster, sure. For boosters in general, not really.

      • EasternLettuce@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not necessarily, the launch tower is something like a half billion dollar piece of infrastructure and if it had been damaged or leveled it would have been an enormous setback in terms of money and time, as the second tower is nowhere near ready

        • deltapi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think you’ve got too many zeros on your price estimate, no? The tower is huge, but there’s no way it costs five hundred million dollars.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The landing pad wasn’t really at risk. If they had hit it it would have been relatively low speed, by the time it was at the catch attempt it was at like 30 km/h or something. Hitting a big steel object at that speed would have probably done more damage to the booster than anything else

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It wasn’t the first starship launch but it was the first where they tried to land onto the chopsticks. Last time I believe they simulated the same thing but landed in the ocean instead. They did get just one try with this particular rocket since if it was unsuccesfull the rocket would now be in a million pieces.