• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    That graph is so misleading. Makes it look like almost all the users disappeared but the Y axis only covers a small range at the top.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The full range is about 5.5%. So while it is misleading, a 5% drop in a graph that consistent isn’t nothing. Something substantial absolutly changed

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly. Not the over a million that it looks like at a glance.

        The user count isn’t helpful anyway, active users is a much better measure.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I captured the graph with the number after the decrease at the bottom right to try to show the number of lost users, but I see where you come from

      • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you saw why people would criticise it then you’d… edit the post, recapture the graph with an accurate visual representation including the zero on the Y axis?

        • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well…

          • that’s how the website displayed the graph when I took that screenshot, I’m pretty sure you can’t modify the axis
          • I’m not on my computer at the moment, editing is the most I can do right now
          • if you can capture the graph with 0 on the Y axis, please post it below and I’ll update the picture
        • SlothMama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s the only way to demonstrate the fall, of you did it at scale it would’ve even be noticeable.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              There are people here who didn’t even notice the axis and are confused. How do you expect everyone to notice a 5% drop lol.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Or just inform the other adults to consult the axis for clarification.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      no it’s not?

      you can see the axes and op even mentions that it’s a 5% drop

      the graph is clearly just fitted to the data