I don’t like it because it’s placing an objective statement on a subjective matter. it’s also apparently run by a single person (which is understandable given what it needs to do) but I just don’t like the vibes that gives off.
I think it’d be a lot better if it just stated objective things (e.g. where their funding comes from, the corporate relationships, country they’re based in)
fellow noun->verb user :)
helix superiority however.
it’s usually ironic lmao
creating jobs for graffiti cleaners to please the ceo of the cleaning company?
wtf does the article mean by 5G wwan chips being necessary for AI?
omfg this is amazing comeng <3
no it’s not?
you can see the axes and op even mentions that it’s a 5% drop
the graph is clearly just fitted to the data
tbh though work at large publications are probably easier to get/pays better/more reliable, so it’s not like journalists that stay at these places necessarily agree with the publications’ stance
wow lemmy users really don’t like being called low iq lmao
what’s the point of a piece of (visual) media if the same thing can be expressed more concisely with words?
orion browser is webkit based but supports firefox/chromium extensions, so it works with ublock
wtf that is so cool
i think a better bot would be one that shows the financial/managerial ties a publisher has in a tree format so people can make the decision themselves about political bias
except when your government pays full price for it and sells it off to a company for a tiny bit of money so they can make money with tolls
i mean they could just really easily host a matrix instance or something
gives off the same ‘solution looking for a problem’ vibes as corporate marketing around ai lmao