Privacy advocates got access to Locate X, a phone tracking tool which multiple U.S. agencies have bought access to, and showed me and other journalists exactly what it was capable of. Tracking a phone from one state to another to an abortion clinic. Multiple places of worship. A school. Following a likely juror to a residence. And all of this tracking is possible without a warrant, and instead just a few clicks of a mouse.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    198
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    This should be illegal. There is absolutely no good reason this should be available to anybody. It should also be considered unconstitutional; if one of those dots is a person, whether you directly know who the person is or not, it should violate the right to privacy and the right of illegal search and seizure — no questions asked.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      You are right. And you’re fighting against the credit reporting agencies and google, facebook, apple, and all car manufacturers for privacy rights.

      This is the result of jurists and legislators who don’t understand a single goddamned thing about computers in 2024. For fuck’s sake it’s been thirty goddamned years since this was obviously going to happen. Take a class, you bastards! Those of you who aren’t Heritage Foundation fascists.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s not getting better either: https://futurism.com/the-byte/gen-z-kids-file-systems

        There seems to have been a short window of maybe two decades in the 80s and 90s when computers and the Internet were becoming household staples where almost everyone who grew up in that time period knows what’s up, while everyone who didn’t is way more ignorant. The older folks are lost because they didn’t grow up with computers. The younger kids are lost because they were born into a world of advanced UIs, “plug and play”, and software that heavily obfuscates the nitty gritty details of how it works.

        Being forced to run command line installers, edit config.sys files, set DIP switches correctly for your front side bus speed and messing with IRQ settings for your sound card and such just to play a computer game will definitely teach you a thing or two. My family’s PC came with not only an instruction manual, but an entire language reference for the built in GW-Basic interpreter. Nowadays, you get a laptop with a small pamphlet showing you how to plug it in and turn it on.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’m convinced that a good number of legislators understand the implications of this stuff on a cursory level, but are convinced (read: bribed) to not care on the “condition” that it doesn’t apply to them or their families. They are beholden to their constituents, and their constituents aren’t you and me, as we can’t afford them.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Search and seizure, the Fourth Amendment, only applies to State actors. The only exception is when a private entity is acting as an agent of the government, such as in the case of private prisons.

      Congress needs to pass consumer protection laws aimed at privacy in the digital age. They haven’t updated this sort of thing I believe since 1996. It used to be legal for adult video stores to disclose the tapes people rented, but Congress passed a privacy law forbidding it when some journalists disclosed some of their rentals. The scandal had some cool name. I forgot what.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        The government cannot access the information without a warrant. It does not matter if SPYco lays it all out on a public website. If they needed a warrant to track you before, they need a warrant to check for you on the public website.

        Saying the government is allowed to obliterate the 4th amendment because a private company did the hard part is just asking for government aligned corporations to gather it all up and hand it over whenever the government gives them a dollar.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      The solution is to subscribe to these services. Then create a website that offers real-time tracking information, freely to the public, of the most wealthy and powerful people in the country. Every Congressperson should have their location shown freely available to all in real time. You could call it “wheresmyrep.org” or similar. Literally all of them tracked like animals in real time, freely shown for any and all to see. Let them live in the fish bowl they’ve created for us all.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        We’re kind of seeing that with those private jet trackers. But that’s not changing anything except getting those accounts banned from social media.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          I think those just need to move to have their own independent sites instead of basing their operations on social media. Ultimately what they’re doing is entirely legal, but it’s way too easy for some asshat billionaire to pull some strings to get them pulled from a platform.

      • Spitzspot@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        It is something we can do right now though. Even the youth who can’t vote yet can participate.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’d be surprised if it lasted longer than any other socially progressive trend. A few weeks, tops, with largest proportions falling off in the first week.

        This is the reality of social momentum these days. Resistance is no threat because it has extremely brief lifespan before moving onto the next thing to be a part of.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 days ago

          I agree but not because it’s “trends” but because this system forces us to have short attention spans by presenting us with a massive deluge of information about horrible things happening everywhere (many of which are caused either directly or indirectly by that very system) so we have basically no choice but to keep shifting our focus and updating our threat assessments or risk becoming totally overwhelmed and falling behind or burning out.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or - OR, right, everyone can turn off location and WiFi on their phones.

      It’s true the cell ping is always going, but that’s a different thing and definitely not what this tool is using to track people. Odds are good it’s using facebook or some other cancer to perform this evil.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 days ago

        I don’t think cellular location would be excluded from such tracking tbh. I would rather not take my phone with me at all when visiting such a potentially sensitive place, or at the very least use a Faraday cage.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Odds are good it’s using facebook or some other cancer to perform this evil.

        You really need to read the entire article. Turning off your WiFi and deleting Facebook isn’t going to fix this.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          It’s a good start tho

          This sort of surveillance is only possible because of the mobile advertising ecosystem. Location data is sometimes used to build profiles on device users and better target advertisements to them. Much of that advertising relies on a MAID, the unique advertising ID, on a phone. The MAID acts as the digital glue between a device and its associated data.

          But that same underlying system, of Google and Apple linking a unique identifier on the phone to a user’s activity, allows Babel Street and others to build their mass monitoring products. In many cases, a device’s MAID is also displayed inside Babel Street.

          So periodically refresh / replace your ad id as well.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        That won’t work. But if you install the ROM without gapps or closed source software, you don’t have to worry about these issues.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Having just done that for the first time I feel confident in saying anyone who’s still using facebook or Xitter or tiktok or whatever - is not going to do that. I wish they would but that’s an order of magnitude more technical than where they are.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Counterpoint - the only reason I didn’t degoogle earlier was because my phone simply didn’t support Lineage or Divest. Chances are that whatever budget Chinaphone you have would be in the same situation. Now I bought a Pixel specifically with the intent of installing a privacy-preserving OS, but for a while most I could do was ADB-disabling Google services.

            Unlike installing Linux, chances are high that a degoogled OS wouldn’t work on the hardware you already have.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              Oh it took me a solid month of trial and error, scrolling through xda and other forums reading every how-to and watching plenty of vids and I finally got it to work. But it was not even fun. Yes starting with a Pixel is better, but f* teh googlez.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Or - OR, right, everyone can turn off location and WiFi on their phones.

        Right now. But maybe not forever and so regulation to make sure that we canor even better, regs against this tracking. Because it shouldn’t be necessary.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      10 days ago

      I got nothing to hide.

      I’m willing to bet that they have curtains on their bedroom window…

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      “why don’t you take your clothes off, then? You said you ‘have nothing to hide’, didn’t you?”

    • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ve heard this exact same thing from a former colleague that left my company to go work at a place selling “smart” security systems 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    10 days ago

    It drives me nuts how our economic system is making not having a cell phone increasingly difficult. Many necessary things won’t even work on a tablet. The smartphone is the most amazing futuristic device I dreamed about that has evolved into a distopian nightmare.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      It drives me nuts how our economic system is making not having a cell phone increasingly difficult.

      that’s by design. why you do you think the US government allows corporate interests to take such a high position above American citizens? it’s not just only because of corruption, it’s because one hand washes the other.

      The smartphone is the most amazing futuristic device I dreamed about that has evolved into a distopian nightmare.

      like all technology, it can be used in ways that you cannot even imagine.

      instead of blocking advertising data, we should embrace it IMO.

      imagine a world where users shove so much information at these tools that they can’t even tell what’s real or not. camouflage works better when everyone participates.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        instead of blocking advertising data, we should embrace it IMO.

        imagine a world where users shove so much information at these tools that they can’t even tell what’s real or not. camouflage works better when everyone participates.

        There’s an ad blocker that does exactly this. Called Ad Nauseam. Chrome blocked it from their store super fast, then blocked it from being installed in Chrome from 3rd party sites, then blocked known versions of it from being manually installed in developer mode. I used to run it set to a low percentage - if I “clicked” every ad they’d know to throw my data out, but if I click say 3% of them…

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Run a headless browser that does random searches at random times across different social media and search engines and have it click random ads.

        • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          This was part of the fictional operating system in the book Little Brother. I think it inspired similar features in a particular real life Linux build too

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          does it though? if everyone is sharing their advertising data under the covers no amount of ML could correct it.

          think of it like a tor network for advertisement tracking.

          you’re going to Walmart, I’m going to Target. but according to our phones, I’m at Walmart and you’re at Target. now scale it up to thousands or even millions of users sharing their advertising trackers.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It is only dystopian because we have not taken back the power to control our devices. We of course need some serious privacy laws to allow this to happen. Right now is the defining moment for the 21st century. Will we take control of our technology or be enslaved by it?

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 days ago

    Start tracking politician phones. Oh look who paid a visit to the lobbyist house this week! That shit will get shut down real quick.

    • actually@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      The leaks that 2% of the population got very excited about for a while, but try not to think much about? The leaks judged by many on the reputation of an obscure man living in Russia? Those leaks?

      I trust my government and not things only nerds understand. Also they sound weird and made up and very scary ( said most of the people)

      • isaaclw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Maybe, I think people still “know” its going on, but they forget by the allure of our smart phones, so this is a good reminder.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    As people get ready to vote here in the US, one issue I haven’t even heard brought up is the lack of privacy regulations in the US. Do most people not care if the person they’re voting for is fine with every corporation selling and sharing personal data?

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Our electoral system results in a choice between two candidates, and both are fine with it.

      • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        And more over the electorate is calcified along party lines where the outcomes for either side is perceived as being stark and dire. I suspect this means concerns like these might get stifled even if it is held by both parties.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I was just traveling in the UK and I had this discussion more than once having to explain why our options are always terrible and ignoring issues voters want addressed.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Privacy regulations are to the left of the Overton window. The idea that corporations don’t have some divinely ordained ownership of our personal data is unthinkably radical.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s such a non-problem to my family members that if I even suggest it is a problem, I get ignored.

      No one cares. It’s either nothing anyone values or they figured they never had any privacy to begin with.

    • IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      improving the healthcare system is not even a topic of discussion this time around let alone something most people would see as abstract

    • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You don’t hear about it because the two major parties both oppose them and have nothing to argue about

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Omg there’s soo many critically important issues that never even get brought up.

      Like shutting down the nuclear arsenal, defunding the military and police, establishing a carbon tax, making carbon extraction illegal, establishing UBI. All of these basic policies never even get discussed on mainstream media and it drives me crazy.

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    a device that constantly connects to antennas all over the place, is used to track your location.

    who would have thought?

    if you dont wanna get tracked - dont bring your phone.

    • wrekone@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 days ago

      If you don’t want to be tracked illegally, don’t bring your phone.

      If you don’t want any to be tracked legally, write/call/tweet/visit your representatives.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Also just write your Supreme Court and ask them how this isn’t a flagrant violation of the intent of the fourth amendment. Seriously the founding fathers would be asking what the fuck about this. They weren’t good people but they would’ve been privacy nuts.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          if you’re talking about the supreme court, as in the SCOTUS, they’re long past pretending they give the slightest fuck about the bill of rights.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or we could get rights protecting us from this. Especially considering that that’s a reasonable interpretation of the fourth amendment and the ninth amendment.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Wouldn’t just keeping your phone in a metal box prevent it from communicating with anything? Keep your phone in a metal box and only take it out when you need it. Only take it out in a location that isn’t sensitive. Or hell, just make a little sleeve out of aluminum foil. Literally just wrapping your phone in aluminum foil should prevent it from connecting to anything. A tinfoil hat won’t serve as an effective Faraday cage for your brain, but fully wrapping your phone in aluminum foil should do the job. Even better, as it’s a phone, such a foil sleeve should be quite testable. Build it, put your phone in it, and try texting and calling it. If surrounded fully by a conductive material, the phone should be completely incapable of sending or receiving signals.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          You sure it’s still not phoning home? How do you know “off” is really “off” anymore with a modern phone? It’s not like an old flip phone that you can just pop the battery out. Sure it sounds paranoid, but we’re literally talking about something that used to be the realm of crackpots and cranks - “the government is tracking all of us 24/7!” Well, it seems that’s actually literally the case now.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Yes. When your phone is off, it is off.

            If you’re paranoid you can buy a faraday bag.

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 days ago

              The iPhone remote locator function still works when the phone is powered off. It doesn’t work when the battery is completely dead, but it does work when the phone is supposedly “powered off.” This is irrefutable proof that iPhones at least retain some of their functions even when you’ve “turned them off.”

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                This is where paranoia comes into play. That’s Apple’s information. Not anyone else’s. If you believe Apple is selling it to this company and ignoring the phone setting that enables it then use the faraday bag.

                But this company is not getting that information directly. It gets your information from cell tower pings at best, and social media scraping at worst.

    • MattMatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Meanwhile when I turn off Bluetooth on my iPhone it says “for the next y hours” and there’s no option to turn it off permanently.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      There has to be some way that we could have created the architecture to do everything a phone does without letting a user be triangulated easily.

      I know there is no incentive to do that, but it amazes me how far ahead the security of the web is compared to phone tech.

      Like maybe if phones could authenticate without broadcasting a unique identifier. And maybe they could open a vpn style encrypted tunnel and perform their auth over that tunnel.

      Idk, I know nothing about phones, but it has to be possible.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 days ago

      burner goes from your house, to abortion clinic, to your office, back to your house

      Hmm, must be someone else, I don’t recognize this number

      -The Government

        • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          You really think you came up with an airtight solution to device tracking that nobody in the industry has considered on a whim?

            • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 days ago

              That was possible over a decade ago.

              Link Link Link Link

              Also to be clear, you suggested that you bring a burner phone and set up call forwarding. That implies a phone that’s on. If you’re carrying a burner phone that’s off, I do have a novel solution, just don’t bring it

              • midnightblue@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                No that’s not easily possible on every phone. It’s a specifically crafted FakeOff malware, used by the NSA for targeted attacks. This is not something that just randomly gets deployed on every phone, it’s only used against individual targets. Use GrapheneOS to harden your Android device as much as possible, to defend against such malware getting installed in the first place.

                You really think the NSA will get involved to track someone who wants to get an abortion?

                That was possible over a decade ago.

                You know what also existed over a decade ago? Faraday bags. This concept of physics isn’t new.

                Just stop spreading fear and misinformation.

                • Zink@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  You really think the NSA will get involved to track someone who wants to get an abortion?

                  Probably not, unless it’s an exceptional case where they are already interested for another reason.

                  But if, say, county sheriffs across the country also got access, I would be surprised if I didn’t hear about women’s and doctors’ lives being ruined by them.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                Hm. I said without power. Not switched off.

                Judging by the upvotes you’re far from the only one who forgot about simply removing the battery.

                I suggested no power but not for the entire trip. Put the battery in when you’re sufficiently far from your house so as not to be associated with it. Remove it again when you’re sufficiently close to your house.

                Use your imagination. It helps.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                Keep reading the thread. I’ve already addressed this.

                Really getting confused as to how people read “no power” and think “phone off” instead of “no power”.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Then how you gonna take a selfie in the bed?

      Seriously tho, people need phones for everything, including their calendar and map and communication with their partner.

      Not bringing a phone isn’t an option

      • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        I can assure you that people don’t need instant access to calendars and maps. Smart phones are a convenience, not a necessity.

        (Source - lived through the 80’s. Still alive to tell the tale)

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          “And fuck all the other people who are addicted to smarphones. They don’t matter” /s

          • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            No, they don’t. Because if they’re weak enough to allow themselves to become addicted to a device, that’s their problem to solve. Not even else’s.

            Smartphones are a convince, a tool. Nothing more. If one can’t live without one- there’s a problem needing to be addressed.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              if they’re weak enough to allow themselves to become addicted to a device

              That’s not how addiction works.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        Mapquest is still around, so that solves one problem. The rest can be alleviated by communicating in person with your partner and aligning on a plan to not get tracked (like partner driving you and leaving their phone at home).

        In the absence of that help, friends or family you trust. A cab? The clinic probably has a phone to hail a cab.

        Disclaimer: I’m just providing work arounds, I’m not saying they’re ideal.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Believe it or not, digital cameras exist as standalone devices.

        You can also buy an rf blocking bag for your phone.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yes, you can. But thats the last thing on the mind of someone who is struggling to terminate a pregnancy in the US in 2024. We need something better.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not bringing a phone definitely is an option.

        But I suggested a burner with forwarding so that handles comms to partner.

        If you can’t function without your main device for special circumstances such as this, I guess you just can’t be helped.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Thank you for this, I had to scroll down so far to find a subscription-wall free link. Makes me wonder if anyone actually checked the article…

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    this combined with the whole “your pager/phone is now a bomb” texture that the IDF decided to add into the mix should make for interesting times.

    soon you will be the drone.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      That required special assembly. It was not a hack blowing up commercial batteries. That’s not a possible thing. They gave Hezbollah pagers and radios with explosives built in.

  • Waldowal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    Some additional info based on their published material (screenshot below). The software gets its data from “publicly available sources” which includes tracking information from many different online advertisers, public social media posts, etc. As we know, the advertising data can sometimes have your personal info attached - sometimes not. Babel Street claims to anonymize the data, but let’s assume there is a $$ amount at which they won’t.

    So, theoretically, if you can successfully avoid ad trackers, and you don’t post on social media platforms except where you want to be “seen”, you can avoid this tracking (granted that seems quite impossible these days).

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    🤯imagine how much they spent only to to terrorise women

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      I didn’t read the article, but wouldn’t the site see the phone as soon as it’s taken out of the bag? Unless the plan is to leave the phone in the bag the whole time, at which point it seems easier to just leave it behind.

      • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Pretty much. Can’t see the rest of the article, but most likely it’s just tower data, which only gives a general location. But as soon as you pull your phone out and get messages you would be traceable. Kind of defeats the purpose of having a phone

        • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’ll admit I didn’t open the article, as far as I’m aware the best way to sidestep silly requirements like warrants is to just purchase data intended for advertising. Databrokers really have an amazing wealth of info ready to be tapped into, all you gotta do is pay.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or just hit airplane mode / power off. Or just leave the phone at home, the procedure takes only 5-10 minutes.

      People are way to attached to their phones. The world will not collapse in that hour, it is a survivable event, or so I hear from reputable sources.

      • mx_smith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Can you really trust airplane mode to ensure there is nothing going out. I agree people should just leave them at home, but these bags are like putting tape over your laptop camera. Just an extra peace of mind when going to the Dr.

        • laverabe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          I probably wouldn’t trust airplane mode, but I do believe power off is safe. There is no transmit capability in off correct?

          But yeah, leaving phone at home is best knowing tracking sites like these exist.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            It has been know for at least a decade, I think, that the GSM chip could still contact cell towers while the phone was powered off. I’m sure its successor hasn’t lost that capability.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        airplane mode is on record not trustworthy.

        it will not communicate outward, but it will scan for WiFi and BT APs, then report home once you’re back online.

        even turning your phone off won’t help.

        you need to remove the battery to be sure.

        when I commit my “crimes” against “society” I just leave my phone at home.

        “where were you on x night?” - at home

        “what were you doing?” - jerking off to the thought of your intelligence guys listening to me beating off

        “…”