• Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 days ago

    I honestly don’t understand why people are downvoting the media bias bot. From what I’ve seen, it is pretty accurate. Is it that people see the comment count go up and expect a human comment to interact with, only to be disappointed and then downvote the bot?

    If so, I’d suggest Lemmy/Mbin to not could comments made by bot accounts towards the total comment count.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      MBFC equates respectable outlets like The Guardian and literal nazi rag Breitbart

      It’s propaganda masquerading as impartiality

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I honestly don’t understand

      Could have just stopped there tbh.

      From what I’ve seen, it is pretty accurate

      It’s not. It’s the hobby of a right wing Zionist masquerading as a neutral and authorative arbiter of facts and bias.

      For example, it rates The Guardian, Fox News and Breitbart as equally factual.

      Is it that people see the comment count go up and expect a human comment to interact with, only to be disappointed and then downvote the bot?

      That too, yes. Personally I have it blocked and get annoyed by there being no comments in stead.

      If so, I’d suggest Lemmy/Mbin to not could comments made by bot accounts towards the total comment count.

      Or just get rid of the biased and counterfactual bias and fact checker.

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 days ago

      The Bot is wildly inaccurate as other people have pointed out. Even having the idea of potentially one person verifying the veracity of all news media is plainly ludicrous.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t like it because it’s placing an objective statement on a subjective matter. it’s also apparently run by a single person (which is understandable given what it needs to do) but I just don’t like the vibes that gives off.

      I think it’d be a lot better if it just stated objective things (e.g. where their funding comes from, the corporate relationships, country they’re based in)

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      For me I liked it at first but ended up blocking it after it started doing “more stories like” which revealed that it was clearly there to turn a profit.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 days ago

    I like how everyone hates this Bot! I don’t really care about this Bot itself, but it’s funny how no one likes the Bot and yet they still trying to make it work somehow :P

  • RedC@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    The internet is full of enough bots without making a bot for every dumbass thing on the fediverse, but I guess we really are reddit 2.0