The US supreme court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a case which gun and domestic violence prevention groups are warning could be a matter of life and death for thousands of abuse victims and their families.

Tuesday’s hearing on United States v Rahimi is seen as one of the most consequential cases with which the nine justices will grapple this term. At stake is how far the new hard-right supermajority of the court will go in unraveling the US’s already lax gun laws, even as the country reels from a spate of devastating mass shootings.

Also at stake, say experts, are the lives of thousands of Americans, overwhelmingly women, threatened with gun violence at the hands of their current or former intimate partners.

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The hearing will put the spotlight on a federal law that prohibits anyone under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns.

    If there is a domestic violence restraining order, it’s not just that “someone accused them”. Ironic you call the headline terribly biased. If a court has to put in on paper that you’re such a threat to someone that you get a restraining order, it makes sense you lose your guns too.

    Bad guys with guns and good guys with restraining orders… Yeah that makes sense.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      A restraining order is given at request. It’s exactly that someone accused them and there’s no evidence needed.

      Restraining orders are great tools for abusers.