• wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lmfao Applebee’s isn’t classy at all, it’s like a step above Denny’s. Nobody with money is like ‘you know what I want tonight? some shitty microwaved food in a 90s setting where the service is meh and the cost is 3x what it’s actually worth’. People who think it’s high-class, are not actually high-income. Maybe to the social media influences, not people with real jobs.

    Or has the joint turned itself around massively in the last decade?

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      People who think it’s high-class, are not actually high-income.

      Trump likes his steak well done with ketchup and his bathrooms gold plated.

      Zuckerberg pays hundreds for crappy grey t-shirts.

      The richest man in the world is a twat.

      Wealth, class, and discernment are not synonymous.

      Cunts are still running the world.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Maybe they mean high income in comparison to the world? Like the top 10% of wage earners globally starts at just above $100,000 and that isn’t caviar and cristal money.

    • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Bullshit you can get pancakes at Denny’s. Applebee’s is a step above 711 since someone else microwaves the tv dinner for you.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think people only go to Applebee’s for the cheap drinks.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The hundred millionaire CEO of the corporation I work goes to Applebee’s. Yes really. My boss swears when they went once the guy took out a coupon.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You don’t go to Applebee’s because you want great food or a classy atmosphere. You go there because you know what to expect, no surprises.

      You know the food will be, at least, OK. You go there because the service will be, at least, OK. You already know the prices, at least roughly.

      It’s a safe place to take a first date or take the family kinda place. Nothing will be wildly out of anyone’s expectations, plenty of choices for everyone. We all know what we’re walking into. Bland but “safe”.

      Personally? I’d rather take a bet on a rotten-assed, hole-in-the-wall dive where no one speaks English and the salsa is actually hot. But that’s just me.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Applebees is for boomers. Your 60 year olds are eating there because they want to. Anyone under 40 doesn’t actually want to be there.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        originally, Applebees was for millennial college and high school students going out to for a place to get cheap apetizers and hang out together.

        then the boomers started invading.

        • thrawn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Applebee’s opened before the first millennial was born (most consider millennials to be 1981-1996). With an opening date of 1980, the high school and college students of the time are baby boomers.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            The term “boomer” refers to folks born during the post-WWII baby boom, and while the exact dates vary depending on who you ask, usually that’s ending in 1955-60ish, so really with opening years at the end of the century that would be Gen X who would’ve been the majority of the high school and college kids eating there. Granted the generations are pretty meaningless if you look to closely at the specifics

            • thrawn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Hm, basically every statistical source puts it as exactly 1946-1964. 16 and up is what I assume high school and college students that could eat out alone were at the time— a few 15 and under probably made it, but weren’t the target demographic nor the majority.

              Where are you seeing it end at 55-60? I googled it to double check and can’t find a single source that puts it outside the exact 1946-1964 range. Per Wikipedia:

              A significant degree of consensus exists around the date range of the baby boomer cohort, with the generation considered to cover those born from 1946 to 1964 by various organizations such as the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Pew Research Center, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Gallup, YouGov and Australia’s Social Research Center. The United States Census Bureau defines baby boomers as “individuals born in the United States between mid-1946 and mid-1964”. Landon Jones, in his book Great Expectations: America and the Baby Boom Generation (1980), defined the span of the baby-boom generation as extending from 1946 through 1964.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I was honestly going off of memory, and usually when I try to look up the age ranges it’s looking up the younger “generations” so I suppose I’m incorrect

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            My point being the target demographic were millennials, and there was a point where part of it being cool was that there weren’t boomers or older people going.

            Even if it originally served previous generations that were in that same place we were at the time, they weren’t serving those generations at the time we were there. then, the started coming into that space so we left. maybe it wasn’t entirely conscious, but that’s kinda what happened.