Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 months agoPavlov's conditioninglemmy.worldimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imagePavlov's conditioninglemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareKellamity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up24·10 months agoPavlov’s dog is not notable for showing that dogs could be conditioned (bell = food time) What it did was show that a conditional response (bell = food time) could cause a reflexive response (saliva) Classical conditioning is not the same as associative learning. Pavlov’s dog is not about associating Thing A with Thing B - that didn’t need a russian scientist to prove.
minus-squareFwoggey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-210 months agoI didn’t know that! Also apparently the Barenaked Ladies had it right when they wrote Brian Wilson: It’s a matter of instinct It’s a matter of conditioning and a matter of fact You can call me Pavlov’s Dog Ring a bell and I’ll salivate
Pavlov’s dog is not notable for showing that dogs could be conditioned (bell = food time)
What it did was show that a conditional response (bell = food time) could cause a reflexive response (saliva)
Classical conditioning is not the same as associative learning.
Pavlov’s dog is not about associating Thing A with Thing B - that didn’t need a russian scientist to prove.
I didn’t know that! Also apparently the Barenaked Ladies had it right when they wrote Brian Wilson:
It’s a matter of instinct
It’s a matter of conditioning and a matter of fact
You can call me Pavlov’s Dog
Ring a bell and I’ll salivate