• Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    O green peppers are 99 cents each but red and yellow are 1.29? That’s so weird all these peppers I’m buying are green.

    Fuck you, I’m the cashier now.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also

      Oh, something didnt scan and you walked out without paying for it?

      Enjoy your broken spine as cops appear in full swat outfit and tackle you to the ground and beat you with clubs because you are shocked and arent immediately calm and compliant.

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Clearly a joke, but they will start a record for you till they can get you for a felony…

        • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Start a felony charge for a loaf of bread?

          give me a break. These companies cut corners every where they go. You think there stocking up on hard drives and algorithms to cut up and record people?

          • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Look up the target method. They can automatically connect your face/payment ID to items you haven’t scanned. They get you after you’ve racked up enough cumulative value that you haven’t paid for to count for a felony.

            So no, they aren’t sticking you with a felony charge for a loaf of bread. They’re sticking you with a felony charge for enough loafs of bread to value a serious theft charge.

            It’s not going to effect you if you only ever stole one loaf of bread. Waiting until you commit enough theft is the cutting corners part you’re talking about.

            • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Facial profiles and items stolen require directories, centralized databases, hard drives, programming, knowing the items. Personal to sift through the data.

              Companies think that’s cheaper than self check out?

              You must not be an engineer.

              • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It doesn’t have to do with what I think. That is what they do. Why don’t you put any amount of effort into verifying what I said instead of insulting me like you think I just made it up?

                You don’t think that loss prevention would be doing that stuff regardless of whether they had employed cashiers at registers or not? Loss prevention has been around since long before self checkout lanes, doing the same things they’re doing now. They already pay those guys. Self checkout is still cheaper if they don’t also have to pay a dozen cashiers.

                Also, you seem to be imagining a whole fbi crime scene setup in every store for a job that’s basically handled per location by 2 guys and a computer.

                A “database” doesn’t have to be (and usually isn’t) centralized across stores. “Hard drives” can be a single multi-terabyte hdd in the age we’re in now. “Programming” is just out of the box software they teach their prevention guys to use. The facial recognition and knowing items part comes built into the self checkout machine.

                You must not be an engineer either, because an engineer would understand that the cheaper option isn’t necessarily lower tech.

                Again, take 10 minutes and learn how to utilize a search engine. It’s not something they want people to know, but it’s also not exactly a secret. Target pioneered the kind of loss prevention techniques big box stores use today.

      • thereisalamp@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        My husband had a nasty cold and the self scan he was using we later found out should have had an out of order sign on it. After missing the fact that it wasn’t dinging for every item because he couldn’t hear well, they pulled him and had him arrested. His total was off by $100 and he should’ve realized it, admittedly, but he just wanted to get home. We were able to get them to drop the charges because the self check out was malfunctioning but he’s still banned from Walmart.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          and getting banned from walmart is more devastating than most people realize, cause in a lot of places walmart has run out the competition, so if you cant go to your walmart due to a mistake on THEIR part, that means you might have to drive an extra hour to some not-walmart place.

          Its complete and utter bullshit.

          I hope that store burns down with the manager that made that decision trapped inside.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah I’m not paid to use your stupid machine properly. I generally avoid self-checkout and never use it if I have a manually entered item. When there are no full service registers or only one, you know I’m going to be extra sloppy with the self-checkout.

      • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I generally avoid self-checkout and never use it if I have a manually entered item.

        At a certain point you’re just denying yourself the savings. Go get that informal employee discount!

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m against what Walmart especially has done by remodelling stores and removing their checkout lanes and replacing them all with self checkout.

        but I have nothing against a store having a couple self checkout lanes.

        Cause they are nice to have if you only bought one or two things, and don’t want to wait behind a full cart… or if you are buying something you are personally embarrassed about and don’t want to have a cashier see.

        Self Checkout should be a very minor option valuable to a select few.

        not the primary means of checking out for everyone.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh for sure, if I gotta guess I’m picking the one that’s best for me every time.

      Self checkout wants my opinion I’ll give it :)

  • Joanie Parker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 months ago

    At Costco it’s great minus the membership checks. Thanks this was a quick process, now let me stop and take my card out so you can see I’m not stealing deals.

    Walmart, fuck you hire more cashier’s why am I waiting 10 minutes to checkout at self checkout when you have 50 closed fucking lanes!

    • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Walmart, fuck you hire more cashier’s why am I waiting 10 minutes to checkout at self checkout when you have 50 closed fucking lanes!

      I straight up said this the last time I was there to one of the managers watching the self checkout after I heard them complaining about the long ass line. Maybe if you actually turned the other 20 lanes on instead of only having 3 the lines would go by quicker, ya dumbasses.

        • Joanie Parker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If they offered a living wage it wouldn’t be a problem. They can afford it, without raising prices.

          • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 months ago

            No no no no no, HOW could they afford that?

            Tell me how they could afford it as a giant multi billion dollar company.

            It’s not even possible to pull out billions to shareholders and CEO’s each year if they did that.

            Why don’t anyone ever think about the poor ultra rich?

        • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Whether they have them all open or just 3, they still only have 2 or 3 employees watching over it all. For some reason, they’re all open in the morning when there aren’t any customers, but then in the late afternoon, they turn everything off when the store is flooded with customers. It’s ass backwards.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Probably some power-mad manager saying “employees must get up early to learn discipline”.

            • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Having worked at a grocery store, it has to do with inventory stocking. All the trucks show up in the morning, so you need more people around to do intake and stock the shelves. Sometimes they go help in the front in the downtime. Despite what the antiwork folks say, most managers are not power mad assholes, they’re workers playing their role in the system. The owner class however…

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                …so the truck drivers are also forced to get up early? Don’t let me down I want to be jaded today.

                • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  If you’re genuinely curious, a lot of it has to do with traffic management. I will blindly assume that you live near a large city in north america.

                  Trucks are big and cumbersome, especially semis. They’re fine ok the highway, but on city roads around busy places like grocery stores they’re like one man traffic jams.

                  Your typical American grocery store moves literal tons of product every single day, very little of which is produced locally. They require constant, daily replenishing, and it has to be done without disrupting the flow of shoppers and surrounding traffic.

                  The solution is to start your night at a store or distribution center in a major city. Pick up your trailer of paper products or whatever, make your first stop in town, then hit the highway. Stop at towns and cities along the way, dropping off a pallet or two at each until you reach your final stop in another major city where you swap trailers and take a nap before doing it all again. Many grocery stores employ a small team of (frequently underpaid) workers to process all this at odd hours in the night.

                  Supply chain is 24/7

    • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing I really hate about it is that where I live, they don’t have bags at the self checkout. Cuz you know, someone might steal a fucking plastic bag. 🙄

      • swan_pr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Where I live (Montréal, Canada) plastic bags are banned everywhere. You either bring your own or buy a reusable at the cash. Some places (like grocery stores) also sell paper bags. You get used to it. If you have a car you leave a bunch of reusables in the trunk, if you don’t you just have to remember to bring one with you. The also sell some super thin ones you can carry in your pockets that are sturdy and large enough for a small run at the grocery store.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only thing I’d hate about that, is if they don’t have a recyclable option and you always have to buy the reusable ones. At some point they just become garbage because you forgot them for the last 20 trips, and who needs 100 reusable bags?

          • swan_pr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I agree. I have a drawer full and a bunch in my car. I see a lot of them for sale for a buck at thrift stores, it’s kind of funny and sad.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I have about what, five reusable bags. One is always in the backpack to use both as a basket replacement in case the supermarket doesn’t have any (or they’re all at the exit and none at the entry), or as overflow container for the backpack, one is generally holding onions and yet another potatoes (both hanging), that leaves – yep, one as backup and the awkward small one is stuffed with three dirty dish towels waiting for hot wash to accumulate.

            Do consider cloth bags simply because it’s easy to actually give enough of a fuck about them, just like you give a fuck about a t-shirt. Oh and keeping potatoes and onions in plastic would likely not end well. The only plastic bags I buy are bin liners.

            If you’re shopping with a car the standard over here is to have a fold-up box in your boot.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think you’re misunderstanding me. I’m saying that I’d hate situations where my choice is “carry loose items” or “buy new bags” if I’ve forgotten my already owned bags at home. I don’t dislike reusable bags, I own quite a few actually, but when I forget them I’d rather buy paper bags than be forced to buy yet more reusable bags.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Most grocery stores still offer paper bags and personally I love them to pack everything I want to bring to the recycling bin

              • swan_pr@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes, and also for the compost. I used to store a few as well but they are so thin now, it’s not worth it.

        • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not that I care what they’re made of. Here they’re required to charge 10¢/bag. I would happily take a paper bag. The thing I don’t like is being treated like an extremely petty criminal.

          As an aide though, everything I’ve read supports the conclusion that the bag bans only lead to more waste. IIRC, a generous estimate would mean you need to reuse a bag at least 20x in order to break even on resource usage… Which basically never happens. It’s an excellent example of a feel good solution that sounds good until you run the numbers. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

          That said, I’d be perfectly happy to see us eliminate almost all uses of disposable plastics.

          • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I like the aldi model with no bags—when you forget a bag you look for an empty box. Not ideal for people who walked though.

            • ares35@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              last time we hit aldi, no bags or boxes. we just threw all the stuff into the trunk and dealt with it at home.

          • swan_pr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s different here (at Walmart at least), they leave all their reusable bags at the self checkout where you can just buy them. But there is a lot of staff and the area is like a bullpen, so there is only one exit and there are employees looking at the carts’ contents.

            As for the bags, for sure it’s a contentious topic. And I agree with you. As I mentioned in another reply, I see a lot of the sturdier reusable bags for sale at thrift store, they have to roll them up and put them in a bin they have so many…

          • Pandantic@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            IIRC, a generous estimate would mean you need to reuse a bag at least 20x in order to break even on resource usage… Which basically never happens.

            I’ve definitely used my reusable bags more than 20 times. Why don’t people use them more than 20 times?

      • raynethackery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        In the before times, when you could still find baggers at checkouts, paper bags were provided. I know the cost was figured in to the prices but it is B.S. that they now charge for them.

    • Romanmir@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Neverminding that we have to scan the cards to even begin scanning the (soon to be our) stuff.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The Costco self checkouts can only do a certain amount of weight per square inch before they shit the bed. Which is bad, because it’s costco. Unloading the entire shelf while you haven’t paid can’t be done, so you have to scan, hit the weight limit, pay, unload, then scan and load the shelf again…and then pay again. Idiotic design that multiplies the wait times considerably, lol.

    • FapFlop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      My Costco has had “self checkout” for about a year now. There’s a Costco employee that waves you over and scans all your items. I really don’t get it.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have no sympathy for companies losing money due to theft at self-checkout, it’s a cost saving measure that’s bitten them in the ass.

    They also suck for alcohol, or anything that doesn’t have a barcode, as mentioned in the story. I never buy either of those products at self checkout.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 months ago

      That said, I really liked the opportunity to not have to socialize with someone

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ha, I once got booted from a Safeway in my early 20’s when I was trying to buy beers and the lady who was supposed to be verifying ID was shooting the shit w her coworker. She clearly saw the thing flashing, but wanted to finish her story. I tried waving at her to no avail. She had a very I’ll get to you in a minute vibe, but she clearly wasn’t talking about work stuff. I had worked at a Lucky previously and they used the same self checkout system system. I knew I just needed to type my bday on their terminal to get it to sell, so I went n did it lol. Hey, self check out amirite? I figured fuck it, I’ll do that part too I guess.

      She finally noticed like right before I paid and took my beers and wouldn’t let me pay. I was like here’s my ID, I’ve been waiting like 5 minutes to show you. Manager showed up told me to leave, and never come back, it was a whole thing. Granted, I was 100% being a young , dumb prick, but I was annoyed with the lady not doing her job, and wasting my time. Having been on the other side of that terminal before, knowing how easy it was to do, I was super annoyed that she wasn’t even acknowledging me trying to get her attention. Fun times lol.

          • fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s probably my inexperience with self-checkout speaking, but I would never enter PII into a corporate terminal for the sake of a six-pack.

            • oldGregg@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Like 70% of the time I buy from a cashier they scan the barcode on my licence.

              Everyone on that hill died years ago, where have you been?

              • fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                In my day it was a sight of your ID alone, and only on the cashier’s discretion. Which is still the norm today at many retailers. I will never use any POS system that requires ID scanning/PII provision as a default.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      Self checkout is useful when you only want a few things. Much faster.

      If you’re getting a full trolley, you’d need a barcode scanner to take round the shop with you. If you don’t have that, it’s faster to go with a manned checkout.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        A grocery store near me has the self-scan as part of the app. It’s pretty good, but honestly it’s not that bad to do a full trip through the self checkout.

        • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Wegmans tried that at first but failed and removed it. No one wants to scan products with their phone while shopping.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Oh dang, I love it. It’s awesome to be able to see what my total cost is as I shop. I definitely buy less when I do it that way, and added bonuses include everything already being bagged the way I like it and not having to talk to people (at least usually). I did it all the time during the pandemic.

            • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The only thing is that I wish I had something other than the phone for the scanning. Using the phone camera to scan isn’t anywhere near as fast/good as using a scanning gun.

              But my guess is that it got removed because too many people were “scanning” and just taking off. It’s pretty easy to fool self check, but enough people will avoid trying because there are people there, cameras, etc. Pretty hard to get that coverage on the whole store.

              • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Maybe, and that’s probably the reason they cite, but honestly I bet the real reason is that people were buying less and so they wanted to make it as difficult as they could without removing the option entirely.

          • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I do. It’s kinda new here in Germany, but I think it’s working pretty well.

          • Clegko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You say that, but Walmart and SamsClub’s Scan and Go is extremely well received because it allows people to scan shit as they put it in their cart and pay on their phone.

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The theft is a feature, not a bug in my eyes!

      Alcohol isn’t so bad where I’m at, I just scan it first to give the worker some time to scan their badge and let me continue

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I honestly only use self check out. I don’t buy a ton in a single shopping trip and I just find it easier to do it myself since I bring my own bulky bags that go on the side of my bike. A lot easier for me in general and sucks some places are getting rid of it.

    • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Interesting! Alcohol doesn’t have a barcode there?

      Here it does. But the self checkout lamp will go to red instantly and a clerk has to come to approve your age.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But the self checkout lamp will go to red instantly and a clerk has to come to approve your age.

        Which negates the benefit of self service.

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just scan the alcohol first, scan the rest next. As long as it’s not the only thing you’re getting, it’s almost def faster. Even if it is the only thing you’re getting, the time for someone to do an age check compared to standing behind 2 carts/trollies is nothing. Self check for me almost every time is way, way faster. Exception being if I have a ton of groceries (I can scan as fast as teh employees, but the self check shit has more guardrails that slow shit down) or a ton of produce (employees at a lot of stores are required to memorize the PLU, I am not.)

          • Clegko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The store near me stops the scanning process and makes an attendant come check your shit. Literally sits on a screen saying “AN ATTENDANT WILL BE WITH YOUR SHORTLY, PLEASE WAIT”.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trying to tell the pears and their variants and potatoes and their variants apart is such a pain in the ass without a barcode. Especially since the example pic is usually quite different, and like 10px on a 480p greased up, airgapped touchscreen. I hate self checkout. The only time I use it is when the store is open late at night. Which, I actually do like. Having stores open till 1am or 3am can be extremely handy, especially if you have an office job during the day and do night classes.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I bought beer last time I went through self checkout and of course it called some teenage girl over to check my ID; I’m pushing 60. I just said “No. I’m old enough to be your grandfather.” She was fine with that.

    • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      After a few times I memorized where the bread or fruit (w/o barcode) I usually buy is in the menu and am almost equally fast as an employee would be. So it just took me some time to adjust personally.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Remember kids, if you see someone shoplifting or switching the barcodes at your big-box self-checkout: No you didn’t.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Preach!

      I’m lucky enough to not need to take the risks involved in order to get by, but I’ll be damned if I’m going to fuck over someone that may be unluckier than me. Idgaf what it is, I’m fucking sergeant Schultz.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        The way I see it, you’re doing a public service…

        • You’re creating jobs in loss prevention.

        • You’re helping make the case for retaining more checkout workers.

        • You’re keeping those minimum-wage checkout supervisors safe by not putting them in a position to intervene with desperate people trying to feed themselves.

        • You’re helping the store avoid wage theft by having you play unpaid, untrained, unqualified security guard.

        • You’re helping the needy feed themselves.

        Give yourself a pat on the back, you local hero! 🫡

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      My grandmother snitch on some poor bastard stealing crystal light at walmart. If someones stealing fucking crystal light from walmart theyre clearly in way worse than I am.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I worked at a supermarket in a wealthy area for years - no one stole more than the wealthy old crones from the retirement village next around the corner.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The funny thing is she ain’t wealthy, ffs we live in the same house. She’s just got a really stupid and weirdly conservative and at the same time progressive sense of morality.

    • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      If I cared enough, I’d tell someone because I hate thieves, but I generally prefer to mind my own business. Same philosophy if I saw someone stealing from a small business.

        • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          “These companies don’t pay their employees enough, in my opinion, so I’m ok with people stealing from them.”

          Just say what you mean.

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m not OK with people stealing from them because they don’t pay people enough.

            I’m OK with people stealing from them and they don’t pay their employees enough, and they still steal more in wage theft than is shoplifted from them.

            Why do you feel compelled to play unpaid security guard for a bunch of billionaires? They neither need nor appreciate your help.

            • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              I care about billionaires as much as I care about you and poor people: the sum of zero. My opinion is simply that, my opinion.

              • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                You care enough to intervene, to correct me, and to keep posting to tell me you don’t care.

                OK, my guy.

                • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  This is a public forum. Where debate and conversation takes place. Having a conversation with someone doesn’t mean you care about them. That’s an odd conclusion to reach. Chill out guy. It’s ok when people disagree with you. It’s a good thing. It’s a way of being exposed to new ways of thinking. If you’re looking for an echo chamber, I’m sure reddit is taking new users.

      • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you hate thieves, you should love shoplifters. The real thieves are at the top scheming more ways to fuck the poor.

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            If you’re concerned about theft, this is objectively correct - Walmart steal more through wage theft than shoplifters steal from them.

            Similarly, in terms of harm done, stealing even a flatscreen TV has an imperceptible impact on the Walton family, while stealing wages from an employee that’s so underpaid, their wages need to be supplemented with publicly funded food stamps is crippling.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Especially when these people aren’t shoplifting big-ticket items like TVs. They’re shoplifting things they’re desperate for like food.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Oh - that I just don’t care about. Do you care about the wage theft they’re committing? It’s at a far larger scale than any shoplifting.

        Why are you so concerned with protecting a massive multi-billionaire-owned company plagued with ethical issues? Are those billionaire boots super-tasty or something?

        I am not a smart man.

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    No they aren’t they are gonna lean in even harder what a dumbass story. One time fixed cost will always win over paying people in perpetuity

    • TronCat@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I have trouble believing this. They just remodeled the Walmart near me and I bet there’s 60 self checkout machines. There’s like maybe 3-5 normal checkout lines in between the self checkout.

    • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I saw a grocery store put in the best self checkout lanes I’ve seen, then take them out a couple years later because their customers didn’t like them.

      Things be weird sometimes.

      • Goferking0@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        My favorite is still having them closed when low staffed because they still need a person dedicated to helping them.

        Just amazing how much trouble management goes to to make experiences for customers worse

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Exit gates you need a receipt to go through. That shit isn’t even legal, I’ve been waiting for someone pushing that to the SC so they’ll have to dismantle them nationwide.

          Ppft, stores thinking they can hinder my free movement in society? I’ll go violent over that, that’s where I draw the final line, no more of this capitalist surveillance shit, you put barriers in my way I’ll stomp them to pieces.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Kroger here just added two more lanes of self-checkout. We won’t use them. We’re a family of 3. We buy a lot of groceries. Doing it by ourselves would take so much more time.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Our Kroger had two rows of mini self checkouts, 2x3, and adjacent it was a cashier checkout. They removed one of the rows of minis and replaced it and the subsequent with a conveyor self checkout instead, so 3 minis and 2 conveyors.

        Now there are fewer places to check out, and the belted checkout is annoying as all hell to use. If you have 3 items it’s wasteful to use it because you have to walk 5 feet to fetch your bags, and if you have a large cart of groceries you wouldn’t want to self checkout anyway because it’s a hell of a lot easier to have help.

    • Raglesnarf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I keep seeing stories every so often on Facebook about this. I feel like these stories just pop up to bring up engagement on the site. most stores in my area (Florida) have increased self checkout

    • spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I think they saw a couple of examples Of stores taking out the self checkout lanes and ran with them. Although you could say the theft that the self checkout lanes allow is a recurring expense, but that’s probably not nearly as much as the saving that the machines give.

      • Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It isn’t. Or at least it isn’t as big of a problem as they are letting on. https://www.retaildive.com/news/retailers-crime-problem-numbers/699107/

        Shrink has hovered around 1.5% (that’s 1.5% of total sales…) And the NRF has been coy about the fact that 1/3 of that shrink is “administrative” issues - lost product, mis allocated, warehouse issues, broken in transit, etc.

        Additionally, a little less than a third is from employee theft, and a the remaining 36% is external theft.

        But since they lump mistakes and general admin issues in with theft, they get to claim a higher number whenever they complain very loudly so that they can redirect the conversation away from the massive increase in profits they have had, along with the increase in wage theft cases they are losing, as well as trying to cover up the fact they are closing “under performing” stores in poorer neighborhoods (which not limits access to people in those locations, but the store doesn’t care, they dont buy stuff anyway…).

  • gekkonaut@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    unexpected item in the bagging area. place items in the bagging area. unexpected item in the bagging area.

    • Sway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Even worse, here in Canada at the Sobeys owned stores, you can opt to use your own reusable bag (plastic grocery bags are now outlawed) but if you do they prompt an employee to come check your bags. They never actually check, but if there isn’t an attendant around you just have to wait there until they notice and end the prompt. I waited for 10 minutes the other day because the employee went off for a break or something.

      Edit: spelling

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh man I nearly gave my SO an aneurysm because I started scanning items while she set up the reusable bags. Both of us were so over that stupid machine getting made about those bags sitting there!

        • Sway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh same note too! If you dare start doing something before you’ve gotten those bags ok’d, or if you plunk down a bag before it prompts you to do so it’s like you’re committing a felony.

          • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            You gotta time it with a heavy item. Some machines have tolerances for weight (or so it seems). So I always pick my heaviest item and put it down at the same time I put the bag down. Basically bagging it and placing it down at the same time. That “tricks” the machine into not realizing the extra weight is from a bag since the bag should be within the weight tolerance of the heavy item.

            I’ve never had it fail.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You know, around the 5-7 minute mark I’d be dumping my reusable bags and walking out.

        • Sway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I would’ve but I had just spent an hour getting a cart full of groceries and I wasn’t about to go do that again somewhere else. Plus I couldn’t imagine, at the time, they’d be gone that long.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’m thankful pretty much every store here deactivated that sensor shortly after installing self checkouts.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        A Kroger near me recently updated their self checkouts and now they’re way more sensitive, they view any hand movements on its little camera as “you just slipped something into the bag I’m calling the employee over”, and you can’t mute them anymore which is the lost infuriating for me. I have trouble doing things with a lot of noise, and having a loud ass computer yelling about everything it’s doing makes my checkout take easily 3-4x as long. There is no benefit to disabling the mute button, it still screams for employees when something went wrong, and it only frustrates and irritates everyone who can hear it, employees included. I can’t count how many times I’ve heard the employees complain about it too.

        • Geriatrickid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah the Meijer by us is sensitive like this and when it starts inevitably flashing with approval needed an employee comes over, scans their badge and an overhead security camera clip of me scanning the last item displays on screen.

          Which is so awkward to have to stand there with this employee who I’m sure is just as sick of the process as I am.

          I don’t shoplift and I enter all produce honestly, it makes me want to start scanning my avacado as bananas.

        • Ibex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Practice your sleight of hand movements. I’ve figured out how to make it look like I’ve just scanned one thing but moved two at both Walmart and Kroger self checkouts without any alarms going off. Helps a lot with my getting my employee discount for having to run a register.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ugh I had a grocery store with great self checkout and then they added the dumb sensor. Became worst experience. I assume it was intentional sabotage to the self checkout experience. Least that is what I would do.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Is this really something people struggle with? I don’t understand this complaint. I haven’t actually heard that alert in decades.

      Edit: thanks to the few of you who have answered. I’m not saying I don’t have any problems with self checkout—the overhead camera always thinks I’m stealing the soft drink or prescription or whatever that I leave in my cart, for instance—but my problem isn’t ever with the scale thing, even though that’s always the joke everyone makes.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yep. My local grocery store had them in 2003, and that was probably the last time I heard that message.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              But you still haven’t answered the question yet. I’m not saying I don’t have any problems with self checkout, but I never have that problem anymore, and haven’t since the Bush administration, even though that’s always the joke people drive into the ground. I have way more trouble with the camera.

      • Jestzer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        The closest grocery store closest to my house is the only self-checkout store around me that still uses scales and they’re awful. There are certain items it doesn’t pick up on and it forces you to bag your groceries after checking out, making everything slower. I avoid that place at all costs, even though it’s the closest to me.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think they all still have scales, but I think most people’s problems must be with poorly-calibrated ones or something. I haven’t had trouble with them in a very long time. What I have trouble with is the camera above assuming I’m stealing and summoning a person every single time.

      • gekkonaut@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        still alive and well at CVS in Manhattan as of last week. using your own bag just instantly locks the machine, even if you want to place it on the floor. I just abandoned it and went to the real checkout.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Interesting. Around here they all have options for if you’re using your own bag. You just hit the button and it tells you to put your bags on the machine, and then you go on with your life. Sad they haven’t rolled that out everywhere.

  • MycoBro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    At my Walmart the employees don’t stop people from stealing food. They told me as much.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe it’s policy at Walmart for the regular staff to not prevent theft at all. Loss prevention handles that. They’ll build a case without pursuing at first, and then being down the hammer.

      • Rukmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I keep hearing this and I wonder about how they do this. I mean how to they keep records of every shoplifter? Do the employees recognize the people every time they come in? How many shoplifters can they keep track of? Are they like “ah yeah it’s shoplifter 687, put this video in his file”? Do they bother with people stealing an occasional item like basic clothing or food? Are they watching a single shoplifter over years, like what if they only steal once in a while and it’s low value? I’m curious about this, I’ve never actually heard from anyone who was watched over a period of time and then prosecuted.

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          I was busted for shoplifting as a teenager and I sort of know how this works. The general employees (cashiers, service staff, etc.) don’t give a fuck if you steal and will actually get in trouble if they try and apprehend you. Almost all large companies operate this way for liability reasons. They aren’t insured enough to cover all of their staff in the event that one of them gets injured or killed trying to stop someone from stealing something. Much less costly to simply budget in a line item expense for incidental theft that’s bound to happen.

          Instead of the employees focusing on shoplifters, they have a loss prevention agent in the back watching cameras. Those cameras all over the place in all the big box retail stores, and they don’t even look like those super obvious dome cameras anymore. Most people who steal and get away with it will eventually come back to the same store to do it again. They take note of your face/features and watch for you to return (also, the large chain stores will share this information with other nearby stores). As soon as you step through the door the next time you come in, cameras are recording your every move. That’s exactly what happened with me and my delinquent friends. We ripped off the same store about 2-3 times and the last time was when the guy actually made his move and apprehended us. He waited for us to actually take something without paying for it and physically stopped us at the door as we were stepping through the threshold. At that point, they confiscate whatever you stole, show you the security footage of you taking the product and walking out with it, call the cops, press charges for petty theft if under $1000, and call your parent/guardian if you are a minor.

          In my case, I got extremely lucky because the cops simply never showed up after hours of waiting for them, and eventually, they couldn’t legally detain us any longer, so they released us to our parents without charges. My Mom was pissed and set me straight when we got home, and I stopped hanging around the dumbass kids who coerced me into doing it in the first place. We were also banned for life from the store, but I’ve actually been back to that same store several times as an actual customer and they didn’t recognize me anymore. Or they just didn’t give a shit.

          If you just steal once, especially if it’s a spur of the moment thing, a very low value item, or a complete accident, it’s really unlikely that loss prevention will care. If they start noticing lots of inventory going missing, they will watch those sections much closer for suspicious activity. There’s always the chance that you could just be randomly singled out by the cameras.

          I’ve heard of some places not bothering to stop food thieves because a person who steals food from a grocery store probably desperately needs it, but I imagine they all have a line that they aren’t willing to let people cross.

          • August27th@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I feel like in the future this is going to get more intense. They will have facial+ear+gait recognition combined with AI so they can detect and combine literally every instance of shoplifting, intentional or not (to say nothing of footage that only coincidentally has the appearance of shoplifting but they retain it as “proof” anyway), over decades of visits to any of their locations, and once you’ve accumulated over $1000 combined in unpaid merchandise, hit you with a felony charge.

            Or they just ban you after the first incident straight up, and electronically recognize you and kick you out for the rest of your life afterward.

            And you would have no affordable recourse because they have all the footage and lawyer money to oppose fighting it.

        • Joeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          They have your face and whatever else information you give them when you check out. It’s all covered in cameras. Doesn’t take much. I’m sure they don’t get everything and they have false positives. But if you become such a problem for them yeah.

          I don’t have any real experience with this but I think it’s actually hard to catch the accidental thefts and such who they are losing so much money and starting to rethink these things.

      • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Target will wait for you to steal serval “inflated value mind you full profit plus…” thousand dollars of stuff before pursuing you legally. It’s easier when it’s large sums.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly, can you blame them?

      Electronics, luxury items, other “nice to haves” maybe. But who wants to be the reason someone goes hungry?

      Not to mention, they are getting paid dogshit wages.

        • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Can confirm. Used to work for a big retailer and one day caught someone stealing (not food) and confronted them. I was a pretty solid employee who had been there for years but my manager had to fight hard to stop me from being fired; it was a really close call.

          • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah it’s been 20+ years since I worked retail but we weren’t allowed to confront anyone, especially inside the store. We had to wait until they left the store for a manager to approach them and we had to be 100% sure they stole something in the first place.

            The worst I ever saw happen to someone is they gave it back when confronted outside the store, it was a $5 can of automotive spray paint.

            I was never quite sure if this was all legal reasons or because of the blowback against the brand if someone was wrong and it made headlines.

            • evranch@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              When I was a youth, we used to go to Safeway and get donuts or “Mojo’s” (wedge fries) at the bakery, then munch them while walking through the store so that they were gone by the time we got to the till to buy our cans of pop.

              One of those unforgettable moments from those years was when we were finally called out by a security guy, something very casual like “you boys are gonna pay for those donuts up front, right?” and Chris who was “that guy” in our crew, bounced his donut off the mall cop’s head and ran like his life depended on it

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        For this reason, I think it’s pretty shitty they put condoms in alarm boxes. If there’s something I’m okay with stealing from a Wal-Mart, it’s food and condoms.

        Don’t think I could convict anyone stealing safety glasses either.

  • smackjack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Walmarts’s self checkout is the only one in my area that doesn’t frustrate the hell out of me. I’ve stopped going to certain other stores simply because I don’t like their self checkout systems.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Walmart wants to do some sort of AI surveillance shit at their self-checkouts, I noped the fuck out of that and go to their clerks now.

      • smackjack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I stopped taking my phone out at WalMart after I learned that their security cameras are so good that they can zoom in on your phone and read your text messages.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Weird. I generally don’t mind self-checkout but Walmart’s showing you a video of yourself so you can check yourself out while you’re checking out yourself kinda creeps me out. And I don’t even use the self checkout to steal.

  • spectradawn77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t get it. Sam’s and BJs both have scanning apps on the phone. Most amazing tech ever! Costco… HURRY UP! Also, Sam’s and Bjs don’t check my card because I WOULDNT BE ABLE TO BUY ANYTHING WITHOUT THE CARD ANYWAYS… Costco!!

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is a dumb bit of ceremony, but the door checker just glances at the card. You could roll in with a paper print out and be fine until the registers.

      Still, enough people do stupidly wait until they are in the door threshold and then block the path while digging around, so they should get rid of it.

    • smolyeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s so that you can’t share your card with friends. You specifically have to live at the same place and have proof when you add them to the account

  • digger@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    As long as shrink stays below what they save by removing cashiers they will stay. It may be location specific removals at high shrink stores.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    The only reason for Costco to do this would be theft prevention or to make sure members are the only ones using their cards.

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          and then they sign the receipt at self check and on the way out. My guess is that this is still not accurate enough for them compared to traditional scanning. That said, it’s batshit if they if they don’t replace it with some express lines. Obviously most people in costco are there for a cart full of shit, but I (and judging by self check lines) often go in with a specific thing or 3 in mind.

          • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            and how long does it take you to find that thing or three?

            lol kinda joking but kinda not. Every time I went in there for something, it had mysteriously moved halfway across the store and employees didn’t seem to know where…

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Our Costco has started doing this since the pandemic. They didn’t really do it much before. The crackdown is coming at a time where the price of everything is rising and they want more people to buy the membership instead of mooching off others who have.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Literally the opposite is happening. Look at any busy store: self checkout can handle like 10 people, compared to registers which are significantly less at any given time. Registers account for much less business, and corporations are going to try and get by the minimal amount of employees as possible to function. Handling physical cash also adds more complexity with tills having to be deposited, audited, and withdrawn daily.

    • Anaphylactic_Gock@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just wish more stores took a hybrid approach. Like fuck, regular checkout and self checkout don’t have to be mutually exclusive. But all the stores around me with self-checkout never staff more than 1 MAAAAAYBE 2 regular cashiers.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      what is actually happening is far worse then either of the scenarios. Bigger retail establishments such as Walmart is doing away with the brick and mortar stores in general in favor of online only warehouses. No walk in and grab 2 or 3 items, gotta buy it online if you want the item. They were just boasting about it on the Wire (Walmart’s Associate Page not the news site) a few weeks back.

  • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    yeeeeah. They’ll have to hire people to work the checkout lanes in that case… which means paying enough to compete with other employers who offer more. Case in point, here it’s like 12/hr here to work in a grocery, vs 16/hr at Amazon. But even if they do this, people will still shoplift. Self checkout didn’t create the problem, it rather treats everyone like a suspect.

    The grocery I go to never has more than one staffed checkout lane at any time, typically a very long line of people too old, too stubborn, or with too many items to do it themselves. During the day it’s 8 or 16 self-checkout lanes (minus broke ones), and they close in the evening, so everyone is forced to use the slow staffed checkout.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am on a fierce crusade against scanning your receipt to be “granted” exit through the gates. I’m not playing their stupid fucking game, I force the gates open every time as a matter of principle.

      Lol, stores think they have a right to hold me in the store against my will unless I dance their little dance? Suuuure, now watch me leave.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        if you pay a membership (costco, sams, etc), they are allowed to stop you at the door and ‘check’ your receipt.

        other stores, just say ‘no thanks’ and keep walking, or have visible earbuds in and be jammin’ out the door.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I fundamentally hate self-checkouts because they were an attempt to eliminate an essential job in the company. I refuse to use them. Frustrares my wife and stepdaughter, but it is my little way to give the corporations the middle finger and force them to have to employ people.

      • Jako301@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t get what the issue is with eliminating unnecessary jobs. It doesn’t create any extra work for the customer (you have to place all items on the conveyer and put them back into the cart either way), it isn’t offloading any extra work to the other employees and it saves anyone involved a fuckton of time.

        • mao@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Technological advancements have the unfortunately intended side effect of corporations having less people they gotta pay to, because machines are quite the competitor sometimes. While I think OP is being a bit pedantic here, efficiency in and of itself is not inherently good – the question should be who’s extracting the profit. If the increased efficiency translates into less working hours… hell yeah. If it translates into record megacorp profits, then… I see no need in eliminating these unnecessary jobs for now – the worker gets their bread and that’s what I care about

          • Adalast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            This. They may be unnecessary for the company, but they are necessary for society to maintain function and for the economy as a whole to continue smoothly function. Consider an analogy for the economy to a food chain, you have to have the bottom rungs of the food chain that are plentiful and prosperous to continue to maintain the larger predators. If you start taking out the bottom rungs, it may take a while, but the apex eventually starves. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. The more money the poor make, the better the economy will function.

      • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fair! My mom always refused to use them.

        I didnt for the longest time, until the day my friend went through self c/o and took about two minutes, while I took 15 min in the slow lane. Which honestly was less about the employees and more about shoppers who cant figure out how to pay for the two carts worth groceries they got…

  • trackindakraken@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Several times, but not recently, Walmart self-checkout machines would reset after I scanned the first item, I dunno why. But I figured I did my part by scanning it, so I didn’t re-scan it, even though I knew it had reset. I could just play dumb, which isn’t hard for me, if anyone asked. No one ever asked, but they upgraded the software, and it stopped doing that.

    The employees seem a bit happier as attendants than cashiers, so I guess that’s a good thing. I don’t know how many lost their jobs to the machines, though.

    I’ll admit that I’m happier with self-checkout, because I almost never need to wait in line anymore.

    • Beefalo@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not sure how many lost their jobs to the machines at all. At a glance there appear to be about 4 attendants per self-checkout area, which is at least a dozen self-checkout machines at our local Walmart, so they all stay busy enough what with telling the machine I’m old enough to buy beer and such.

      Minus the self-checkout machines I could imagine 2 of the 4 clerks running the usual “not enough cashiers” play that stores got famous for, with the other 2 being sent to the back for whatever duties. Possibly they aren’t hired at all.

      If my questionable observations are accurate, then that means that maybe Walmart is getting more throughput, with everyone ringing themselves up, but maybe they aren’t spending a bunch less on labor.

      I can’t see anybody going back on the self-check machines, though. Not after all that money spent, and the decade that retailers have spent waiting for customers to learn how to do the job themselves, especially the older folks. That was a bitter change to buy, so it’s wishful thinking that we’re going right back to human checkout only.

      Hell, Aldi just installed a couple self checkout machines here. They were the one holding out, too, since an Aldi cashier zooms the groceries through so fast it’s tough to justify. Oh, and they’re trying to have that one person, with shoppers in front of them, also be the attendant for the self-check machines. I double scanned something by accident and the clerk had to stop their own line to help me by pushing a button from way over there and then back to scanning they went.

      Come on, Aldi.