• CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve always found it both weird and ironic that GrapheneOS is only available for Pixel phones when the whole principle of the project is basically “we don’t trust Google”.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      The pixel device is (as far as I’m aware) the only mainstream device that allows you to re-lock the boot loader.

      Otherwise, once a phone is cracked, it remains cracked. I’m not entirely sure what that buys, but that’s why they do it

      • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        They also have an accessible secure element that graphene uses a lot. I’d recommend listening to the podcast interviews with graphene staff

    • throwaway12345678@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This isn’t true at all. Daniel Micay has stated multiple times the goal isn’t to degoogle, it’s to provide a secure and private OS that’s actually usable. They worked tirelessly to integrate GMS compatibility layer and give users the choice to install sandboxed Google play for app compatability.

      GrapheneOS has said countless times that by using Linux and other open source softwares that Google contributes massive amounts of code, you ARE inherently trusting them to not be malicious https://nitter.1d4.us/GrapheneOS/status/1672998518573740033#m

      Google play does what it says and they are very open about what data they collect, which is obviously a lot. GrapheneOS stops much of this collection through sandboxing, where you can deny any permissions you desire.