• Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    ~ 1/3 military kills is definitely not “indiscriminately killing”. These numbers change everything.

    It’s not a mass murder anymore. Oct7 was a justified targeted retaliation.

    • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      67% civilian casualties is a universally abhorrent figure, and shows a complete disregard for the value of innocent human lives.

      Also, mass murder is generally defined as the killing of 3 or more persons at a time. Not exactly a high bar.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        67% civilian casualties is a universally abhorrent figure

        Is it? I mean civilians getting killed is bad no matter the number, and I’m not denying Hamas soldiers committed war crimes, but for example in Iraq the US coalition’s percentage was 77%.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        My man you better not start reading about American civilian casualty figures. And ESPECIALLY not about israel ones.

        Also most israeli civilians are IDF reservists so they are in fact uncounted soldiers. The IDF just called up 300.000 “innocent civilians” to commit genocide in Gaza? lmao.

        The best number is how little children were killed in compared to the total amount of people.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Justified retaliation, and an operation meant to get concessions out of Israel for Gazans. That’s why they took the hostages.