• Yer Ma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Me:Woah I want to see it in action!

    Samsung’s 10 second long video not showing anything useful: 👍

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ad displays, guaranteed. Airports, shopping malls, offices, hotels… all those windows? glass doors? room partitions? wasted ad space.

      Imagine walking down the frozen section of your grocery store… every door, a display… no longer just looking at the products and deciding what to buy, but now endlessly bombarded with bright flashing animations… Imagine the future.

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Reacting to the video, not gonna lie, I kinda dig gamifying life. The street warnings are a nice touch, the “get off” bus feature is nice, making the mall nicer is also welcomed (why spend resources on a nice mall when you can have it virtual?).

        But yeah, ads, loyalty point, buying shit just to “feed” a virtual dog. I am getting both good and bad vibes. But knowing humans and greedy corporations, this wouldn’t end well.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          It all feels bad to me. What feels oppressive to me is the implication that it’s obligatory, not optional. It’s not your choice. In the reality of that video, you can’t function in society and escape the lights, ads, signs, loyalty points, warnings, suggestions, and on and on. It’s like pop up ads on a dodgy website. People who don’t have your best interest in mind have constructed the environment for you.

          • derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I agree with your view, but I’d say it does not feel obligatory, but rather that when not using it, you are at a disadvantage. Like WeChat. Sure, it is not required, but you won’t be able to text your friends, you won’t be able to send money, you won’t be able to pay. But guess what, the platform makes enough money to pay the companies to require it, which makes them more money, which brings more people to the platform - and enshittifycation begins.

            It really is a good video.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Technically, you could live in the modern world without a computer, smartphone or regular access to the internet.

              Realistically, you will be essentially unbanked, have trouble filing job applications or even searching for jobs, be basically unable to check your credit report or freeze your credit or otherwise protect yourself from identity fraud, struggle to file your taxes manually and otherwise have poor access to government services, and have a very difficult time searching for an apartment/home to rent/buy, or filing a mortgage application. If you aren’t a property owner already and/or have a good family support structure, lack of regular internet access makes you more than disadvantaged. I’d say it puts you one bad day away from crippling debt and homelessness.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you don’t mind jail, physical injury, lack of employment, inability to pay for shopping, or, as you mention, online social exclusion, sure many things are not “obligatory”. Almost nothing is “obligatory” in the sense that you can’t physically move your body to do otherwise. “Obligatory” usually means that, if you don’t do the thing, you’ll face unsavory consequences. The person in the video clearly did not like the life they were living.

              Yes, it’s really excellent.

      • SeducingCamel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        My friend sent me a video of exactly that in a store by him. Full displays and you can’t see what’s behind the glass since they aren’t transparent displays, absolutely ridiculous

      • keyA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Imagine walking down the frozen section of your grocery store… every door, a display… no longer just looking at the products and deciding what to buy, but now endlessly bombarded with bright flashing animations

        Walgreens started rolling that out 3 or 4 years ago

  • tory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Looks like it’s always a little bit transparent even when it should be a solid color. And that means it’s not going to stand toe to toe with a regular TV for regular TV stuff. So… It’s hard to imagine a super solid application for this other than maybe decorative pieces in airports or hotel lobbies or something.

    • lledrtx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’ll be used for ads. Really intrusive ads… They could put it anywhere (stadiums, sight seeing places etc) since it is transparent but like once every minute, display an ad.

    • PastyWaterSnake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I could see it being useful for dynamic, informative signs like you said in airports. Having transparency could be actually useful, maybe not just a total gimmick, in some areas I’m sure.

      Or maybe it’s just another useless, overpriced concept piece that we won’t see for another 20 years

  • Fridgeratr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cool but I definitely don’t see the purpose of a transparent screen. I use a screen to see what’s on it, not what’s behind it. I guess it could maybe make some cool signs or billboards

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It drives me insane when science fiction movies and shows use transparent screens and phones, because like… that’s just a worse product for no reason? Why would you want a transparent phone?

      My other pet peeve is holograms that are worse than just like… looking at a screen, or using a projector for a large room of people. Holograms could be cool for certain visualizations, but like… Maybe record a normal video instead of a blurry and pixelated hologram?