Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agoShould this be in unethical life pro tipslemmy.worldimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imageShould this be in unethical life pro tipslemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down4·9 months agoIt is completely ethical to remove the funding power from those who would cause others to suffer. Just sayin, you have options.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up51·9 months agoYeah, but you’re not really conning the higher-ups, you’re conning the grannies who are going to church and giving away their social security money. And they really don’t deserve to be conned even if it would be easy to con them.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down7·9 months agoThey’re going to be conned. Might as well be by someone who can help them with that money.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down4·9 months agoArgumentum ad pessimism, actually
minus-squareAremel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 months agoCan you explain what that means, and what the other guy said please?
It is completely ethical to remove the funding power from those who would cause others to suffer.
Just sayin, you have options.
Yeah, but you’re not really conning the higher-ups, you’re conning the grannies who are going to church and giving away their social security money. And they really don’t deserve to be conned even if it would be easy to con them.
They’re going to be conned. Might as well be by someone who can help them with that money.
Argumentum ad lgnorantiam
Argumentum ad pessimism, actually
Can you explain what that means, and what the other guy said please?